Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1892–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gunder v. Tibbitsgreen1 sentence1901See, Gunder v. Tibbits, 153 Ind. 591 , and cases cited; Whitney v. State, 154 Ind. 573 ; Shenkenberger v. State, 154 Ind. 630 ; Siple v. State, 154 Ind. 647 ; Rinkenberger v. Meyer, 155 Ind. 152 ; Wilson v. Carrico, 155 Ind. 570 ; Mark v. North, 155 Ind. 575 ; State, ex rel., v. Cox, 155 Ind. 593 ; Miller v. Coulter, 156 Ind. 290 . | 1 | 1 |
Conn v. Board of Commissionersgreen1 sentence1900“It is a well affirmed principle that where a power is conferred by a statute, everything necessary to carry out the purpose of the power conferred and make it effectual and complete will be implied.” Conn v. Board, etc., 151 Ind. 517, 525; Sutherland’s Stat. Con. §§310 and 311. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Daniel v. State
green
2 sentences2009The court affirmed the waiver to adult court based on "the viciousness of appellant's attack, the lack of any justification for it, the seriousness of its results, and the relatively mature age, 17, of the juvenile involved." Id. at 368 . 2009The court affirmed the waiver to adult court based on "the viciousness of appellant's attack, the lack of any justification for it, the seriousness of its results, and the relatively mature age, 17, of the juvenile involved." Id. at 368 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Matter of Tacy
neutral
1 sentence1994This court affirmed the waiver order in Matter of Tacy (1981), Ind.App., 427 N.E.2d 919 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Trinity Universal Insurance v. Town of Speedway
neutral
2 sentences1978In Gooch v. Hiatt (1976), 166 Ind. App 521, 337 N.E.2d 585 , this court affirmed the rule stated in Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. Town of Speedway (1965), 137 Ind. App. 510 , 210 N.E.2d 95 , that the opinion of an expert witness that is based in part on hearsay customarily relied upon by such experts is properly admissible. 1978In Gooch v. Hiatt (1976), 166 Ind. App 521, 337 N.E.2d 585 , this court affirmed the rule stated in Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. Town of Speedway (1965), 137 Ind. App. 510 , 210 N.E.2d 95 , that the opinion of an expert witness that is based in part on hearsay customarily relied upon by such experts is properly admissible. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Gooch v. Hiatt
green
1 sentence1978In Gooch v. Hiatt (1976), 166 Ind. App 521, 337 N.E.2d 585 , this court affirmed the rule stated in Trinity Universal Insurance Co. v. Town of Speedway (1965), 137 Ind. App. 510 , 210 N.E.2d 95 , that the opinion of an expert witness that is based in part on hearsay customarily relied upon by such experts is properly admissible. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Whitney v. State
green
1 sentence1901See, Gunder v. Tibbits, 153 Ind. 591 , and cases cited; Whitney v. State, 154 Ind. 573 ; Shenkenberger v. State, 154 Ind. 630 ; Siple v. State, 154 Ind. 647 ; Rinkenberger v. Meyer, 155 Ind. 152 ; Wilson v. Carrico, 155 Ind. 570 ; Mark v. North, 155 Ind. 575 ; State, ex rel., v. Cox, 155 Ind. 593 ; Miller v. Coulter, 156 Ind. 290 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Shenkenberger v. State
green
1 sentence1901See, Gunder v. Tibbits, 153 Ind. 591 , and cases cited; Whitney v. State, 154 Ind. 573 ; Shenkenberger v. State, 154 Ind. 630 ; Siple v. State, 154 Ind. 647 ; Rinkenberger v. Meyer, 155 Ind. 152 ; Wilson v. Carrico, 155 Ind. 570 ; Mark v. North, 155 Ind. 575 ; State, ex rel., v. Cox, 155 Ind. 593 ; Miller v. Coulter, 156 Ind. 290 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Siple v. State
green
1 sentence1901See, Gunder v. Tibbits, 153 Ind. 591 , and cases cited; Whitney v. State, 154 Ind. 573 ; Shenkenberger v. State, 154 Ind. 630 ; Siple v. State, 154 Ind. 647 ; Rinkenberger v. Meyer, 155 Ind. 152 ; Wilson v. Carrico, 155 Ind. 570 ; Mark v. North, 155 Ind. 575 ; State, ex rel., v. Cox, 155 Ind. 593 ; Miller v. Coulter, 156 Ind. 290 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Rinkenberger v. Meyer
green
1 sentence1901See, Gunder v. Tibbits, 153 Ind. 591 , and cases cited; Whitney v. State, 154 Ind. 573 ; Shenkenberger v. State, 154 Ind. 630 ; Siple v. State, 154 Ind. 647 ; Rinkenberger v. Meyer, 155 Ind. 152 ; Wilson v. Carrico, 155 Ind. 570 ; Mark v. North, 155 Ind. 575 ; State, ex rel., v. Cox, 155 Ind. 593 ; Miller v. Coulter, 156 Ind. 290 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Mark v. North
green
1 sentence1901See, Gunder v. Tibbits, 153 Ind. 591 , and cases cited; Whitney v. State, 154 Ind. 573 ; Shenkenberger v. State, 154 Ind. 630 ; Siple v. State, 154 Ind. 647 ; Rinkenberger v. Meyer, 155 Ind. 152 ; Wilson v. Carrico, 155 Ind. 570 ; Mark v. North, 155 Ind. 575 ; State, ex rel., v. Cox, 155 Ind. 593 ; Miller v. Coulter, 156 Ind. 290 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
State ex rel. Repp v. Cox
green
1 sentence1901See, Gunder v. Tibbits, 153 Ind. 591 , and cases cited; Whitney v. State, 154 Ind. 573 ; Shenkenberger v. State, 154 Ind. 630 ; Siple v. State, 154 Ind. 647 ; Rinkenberger v. Meyer, 155 Ind. 152 ; Wilson v. Carrico, 155 Ind. 570 ; Mark v. North, 155 Ind. 575 ; State, ex rel., v. Cox, 155 Ind. 593 ; Miller v. Coulter, 156 Ind. 290 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Miller v. Coulter
green
1 sentence1901See, Gunder v. Tibbits, 153 Ind. 591 , and cases cited; Whitney v. State, 154 Ind. 573 ; Shenkenberger v. State, 154 Ind. 630 ; Siple v. State, 154 Ind. 647 ; Rinkenberger v. Meyer, 155 Ind. 152 ; Wilson v. Carrico, 155 Ind. 570 ; Mark v. North, 155 Ind. 575 ; State, ex rel., v. Cox, 155 Ind. 593 ; Miller v. Coulter, 156 Ind. 290 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Wilson v. Carrico
green
1 sentence1901See, Gunder v. Tibbits, 153 Ind. 591 , and cases cited; Whitney v. State, 154 Ind. 573 ; Shenkenberger v. State, 154 Ind. 630 ; Siple v. State, 154 Ind. 647 ; Rinkenberger v. Meyer, 155 Ind. 152 ; Wilson v. Carrico, 155 Ind. 570 ; Mark v. North, 155 Ind. 575 ; State, ex rel., v. Cox, 155 Ind. 593 ; Miller v. Coulter, 156 Ind. 290 . | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Makepeace v. Bronnenberg
green
1 sentence1899Makepeace v. Bronnenberg, 146 Ind. 243 ; Louisville, etc., R. | 1 | 1899–1899 |
Yandes v. Lefavour
green
1 sentence1898Yandes v. Lefavour, 2 Blackf. 371 ; Kirk v. Hiatt, 2 Ind. 322 . | 1 | 1898–1898 |
Kirk v. Hiatt
neutral
1 sentence1898Yandes v. Lefavour, 2 Blackf. 371 ; Kirk v. Hiatt, 2 Ind. 322 . | 1 | 1898–1898 |
Faught v. Faught
green
1 sentence1897Freeman on Co-Tenancy, section 530; Isbell v. Stewart, 125 Ind. 112 ; Habig v. Dodge, supra; Freeman on Judgments, section 304; Black on Judgments, supra. In fact, it is an essential element or principle underlying the doctrine of former adjudication that the judgment in the former action settles all material issues involved between the parties to that action, and all matters which might have been properly litigated and determined within the issues made or tendered by the pleadings in the case, and to this extent the judgment is not subject to a collateral attack. 1 Van Fleet’s Former Adjudica | 1 | 1897–1897 |
Isbell v. Stewart
green
1 sentence1897Freeman on Co-Tenancy, section 530; Isbell v. Stewart, 125 Ind. 112 ; Habig v. Dodge, supra; Freeman on Judgments, section 304; Black on Judgments, supra. In fact, it is an essential element or principle underlying the doctrine of former adjudication that the judgment in the former action settles all material issues involved between the parties to that action, and all matters which might have been properly litigated and determined within the issues made or tendered by the pleadings in the case, and to this extent the judgment is not subject to a collateral attack. 1 Van Fleet’s Former Adjudica | 1 | 1897–1897 |
Habig v. Dodge
green
1 sentence1897Freeman on Co-Tenancy, section 530; Isbell v. Stewart, 125 Ind. 112 ; Habig v. Dodge, supra; Freeman on Judgments, section 304; Black on Judgments, supra. In fact, it is an essential element or principle underlying the doctrine of former adjudication that the judgment in the former action settles all material issues involved between the parties to that action, and all matters which might have been properly litigated and determined within the issues made or tendered by the pleadings in the case, and to this extent the judgment is not subject to a collateral attack. 1 Van Fleet’s Former Adjudica | 1 | 1897–1897 |
Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. Pearcy
neutral
1 sentence1892Co. v. Pearcy, 128 Ind. 197 , as well as in several cases there cited and reviewed, this is affirmed as a rule of pleading in such cases. | 1 | 1892–1892 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.