9 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Crawford v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2017See Crawford, 541 U.S. at 51-52 . 2005In subsequent discussion the Court expressly noted that although White v. Illinois, 502 U.S. 346 , 112 S.Ct. 736 , 116 L.Ed.2d 848 (1992), rejected the notion that only testimonial statements implicate the Confrontation Clause, Crawford's analysis "casts doubt on that holding." Id. at 61, 124 S.Ct. 1354 . | 1 | 5 |
United States v. Monteirogreen1 sentence2008See U.S. v. Beydoun, 469 F.3d 102, 108 (5th Cir.2006) (“[t]here is no Crawford violation when hearsay testimony is used at sentencing, rather than at trial.”); U.S. v. Monteiro, 417 F.3d 208, 215 (1st Cir.2005); U.S. v. Martinez, 413 F.3d 239, 242 (2nd Cir.2005). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Beydoungreen1 sentence2008See U.S. v. Beydoun, 469 F.3d 102, 108 (5th Cir.2006) (“[t]here is no Crawford violation when hearsay testimony is used at sentencing, rather than at trial.”); U.S. v. Monteiro, 417 F.3d 208, 215 (1st Cir.2005); U.S. v. Martinez, 413 F.3d 239, 242 (2nd Cir.2005). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. David Martinezgreen1 sentence2008See U.S. v. Beydoun, 469 F.3d 102, 108 (5th Cir.2006) (“[t]here is no Crawford violation when hearsay testimony is used at sentencing, rather than at trial.”); U.S. v. Monteiro, 417 F.3d 208, 215 (1st Cir.2005); U.S. v. Martinez, 413 F.3d 239, 242 (2nd Cir.2005). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Murphy v. State
green
2 sentences2016The trial judge is ultimately in the best position to consider the sincerity of the parties’ arguments regarding the three-part test, as well as the overall costs associated with the proposed depositions, and potential alternatives that may better promote pre-trial efficiency of the case. 6 But without the benefit- of knowing the trial court’s rationale, our appellate courts are forced to -presume that- “exculpatory or mitigating evidence would have surfaced *361 from the depositions. ■'sought.” 'Murphy, 265 Ind. at 121 , 352 N.E.2d at 483 . 2016The trial judge is ultimately in the best position to consider the sincerity of the parties’ arguments regarding the three-part test, as well as the overall costs associated with the proposed depositions, and potential alternatives that may better promote pre-trial efficiency of the case. 6 But without the benefit- of knowing the trial court’s rationale, our appellate courts are forced to -presume that- “exculpatory or mitigating evidence would have surfaced *361 from the depositions. ■'sought.” 'Murphy, 265 Ind. at 121 , 352 N.E.2d at 483 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Howard v. State
green
2 sentences2012First, the Court described the deposition in Howard as “a vigorous and lengthy examination” that “lasted approximately two hours and resulted in ninety-two typewritten pages[.]” Id. at 469 . 2012First, the Court described the deposition in Howard as “a vigorous and lengthy examination” that “lasted approximately two hours and resulted in ninety-two typewritten pages[.]” Id. at 469 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
White v. Illinois
green
2 sentences2005In subsequent discussion the Court expressly noted that although White v. Illinois, 502 U.S. 346 , 112 S.Ct. 736 , 116 L.Ed.2d 848 (1992), rejected the notion that only testimonial statements implicate the Confrontation Clause, Crawford's analysis "casts doubt on that holding." Id. at 61, 124 S.Ct. 1354 . 2005In subsequent discussion the Court expressly noted that although White v. Illinois, 502 U.S. 346 , 112 S.Ct. 736 , 116 L.Ed.2d 848 (1992), rejected the notion that only testimonial statements implicate the Confrontation Clause, Crawford's analysis "casts doubt on that holding." Id. at 61, 124 S.Ct. 1354 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Hammon v. State
green
2 sentences2005Id. 2005Id. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.