9 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Perez v. Stategreen1 sentence2017See Perez v. State, 866 N.E.2d 817, 819 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007) (enforcing a defendant's waiver of direct appeal provision in his plea agreement that also contained a waiver of post-conviction relief), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
Creech v. Stategreen1 sentence2017The habitual offender allegation listed three prior convictions, and the habitual substance offender allegation contained six prior substance convictions.. 5 .In Creech v. State, 887 N.E.2d 73, 75 (Ind. 2008), our Indiana Supreme Court explained that "[p]rovisions in a plea agreement that attempt to waive the right to post-conviction relief are void and unenforceable.” Despite the fact that the waiver of post-conviction relief is unenforceable, the inclusion of that waiver does not invalidate the waiver of the right to direct appeal. | 1 | 1 |
Gross v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Gross v. State, 261 Ind. 489, 491-92 , 306 N.E.2d 371, 372-73 (Ind. 1974). [12] Here, the record shows that Williams failed to object to the inclusion of the instruction. 2015Gross v. State, 261 Ind. 489, 491-92 , 306 N.E.2d 371, 372-73 (Ind. 1974). [12] Here, the record shows that Williams failed to object to the inclusion of the instruction. | 1 | 1 |
McLinden v. Cocogreen1 sentence2006"When the court finds a contract to be clear in its terms and the intentions of the parties apparent, the court will require the parties to perform consistently with the bargain they made." McLinden v. Coco, 765 N.E.2d 606, 612 (Ind.Ct.App. 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Wray v. Stategreen1 sentence2002Wray v. State, 751 N.E.2d 679, 683 (Ind.Ct.App.2001). | 1 | 1 |
Indiana Education Employment Relations Board v. Benton Community School Corp.green2 sentences1994See Indiana Education Employment Relations Board v. Benton Community School Corp. (1977), 266 Ind. 491 , 365 N.E.2d 752 , reh'g denied. 1994See Indiana Education Employment Relations Board v. Benton Community School Corp. (1977), 266 Ind. 491 , 365 N.E.2d 752 , reh'g denied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Thompson v. Medical Licensing Board
green
2 sentences1986Upon rehearing, a unanimous court reiterated that state procedural requirements are not automatically rendered inapplicable merely by the inclusion of a claim based upou federal law. 398 N.E.2d 679, 680-681 . . 1986Upon rehearing, a unanimous court reiterated that state procedural requirements are not automatically rendered inapplicable merely by the inclusion of a claim based upon federal law. 398 N.E.2d 679, 680-681 . [4] Electric Utilities also urge reconsideration of our original decision alleging our "misstatement," of I.C. 8-1-3-7, as the statute upon which they relied; whereas they rely upon I.C. 8-1-3-1. | 2 | 1986–1986 |
Christapher Batchelor v. State of Indiana
green
1 sentence2020And we discern no prejudice to Bline’s “substantial rights” from the inclusion of instruction number 9.2 Batchelor, 119 N.E.3d at 554 ; see also Ind. Trial Rule 61. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Kline v. Kline
green
2 sentences2002Because Wallace has not shown reversible error on the question of omission of the tendered battery instruction and, as such, there can be no vicarious liability for IPS on that charge, we need not address the question of whether it was error to fail to give the respondeat superior instruction. [6] The instruction read to the jury on incurred risk tracked instruction number 5.43 of the Indiana Pattern Jury Instructions. [7] In Kline v. Kline, 158 Ind. 602 , 64 N.E. 9 (1902), there was no touching, and the court was considering the matter of an "assault" as an attempted battery rather than a bat 2002Because Wallace has not shown reversible error on the question of omission of the tendered battery instruction and, as such, there can be no vicarious liability for IPS on that charge, we need not address the question of whether it was error to fail to give the respondeat superior instruction. [6] The instruction read to the jury on incurred risk tracked instruction number 5.43 of the Indiana Pattern Jury Instructions. [7] In Kline v. Kline, 158 Ind. 602 , 64 N.E. 9 (1902), there was no touching, and the court was considering the matter of an "assault" as an attempted battery rather than a bat | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.