Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dill v. State, Dept. of Transp. & Dev.green1 sentence2008See Aucoin, 97-1967 at p. 7, 712 So.2d at 66 and Dill, 545 So.2d at 996 (while failure to adhere to AASHTO standards may not itself attach liability, whether DOTD has conformed to those standards is a relevant factor in determining the ultimate issue of whether the roadway is unreasonably dangerous). [24] In fact, our supreme court has upheld greater allocations of fault in cases involving drivers operating vehicles while more impaired than the evidence suggests that Rodney was at the time of the accident. | 1 | 1 |
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Smithgreen1 sentence1994Co. v. Smith, 609 So.2d at 817 [wherein this court stated we found in Cole v. Celotex Corp., 599 So. at 1064-65, evidence of a clear expression of legislative intent to apply the comparative negligence law only prospectively through the legislature's inclusion of the clause: `"[t]he provisions of this act shall not apply to claims arising from events that occurred prior to the time this act becomes effective."']. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cole v. Celotex Corp.
green
2 sentences2008Section 2 of the Act states that its provisions "shall be applicable to all claims existing or actions pending on its effective date and all claims arising or actions filed on and after its effective date."); Cole v. Celotex Corp., 599 So.2d at 1064-65 , (evidence of a clear expression of legislative intent to apply the comparative negligence law only prospectively through the legislature's inclusion of the clause: "`[t]he provisions of this act shall not apply to claims arising from events that occurred prior to the time this act becomes effective.'"). 1992There, we found that the legislature’s inclusion of a clause providing that “ ‘[t]he provisions of this act shall not apply to claims arising from events that occurred prior to the time this act becomes effective,’ ” was a clear legislative expression of an intent that the comparative negligence law be applied prospectively only. 599 So.2d at 1064-65 . | 3 | 1992–2008 |
Barber v. Barber
green
1 sentence2017Nevertheless, in accordance with this Court’s de novo review, we find that the inclusion of the waiver of interim spousal support in the agreement, which is against Louisiana’s public policy, does not affect the validity of the prenuptial agreement. 14 Although not directly on point, Barber, 38 So.3d 1046 , lends guidance on this issue. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Hill v. Lundin & Associates, Inc.
green
2 sentences2015Hill v. Lundin and Associates, 260 La. 542 , 256 So.2d 620, 623 . . 2015Hill v. Lundin and Associates, 260 La. 542 , 256 So.2d 620, 623 . . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc.
green
1 sentence2014Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571 (La.04/01/11), 61 So.3d 507 ; Adams, supra. The trial court gave detailed reasons on the record in support of its decision to include an instruction to the jury on the statutory cap applicable to suits against the state and its political subdivisions and agencies. 9 On the l^final day of court, the trial court observed the following regarding the inclusion of an instruction regarding the statutory cap in its charge to the jury: The defense has vigorously opposed the jury being advised of the cap even though initially I believe it was a motion in limine or a propos | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Wooley v. Lucksinger
green
1 sentence2014Wooley v. Lucksinger, 09-0571 (La.04/01/11), 61 So.3d 507 ; Adams, supra. The trial court gave detailed reasons on the record in support of its decision to include an instruction to the jury on the statutory cap applicable to suits against the state and its political subdivisions and agencies. 9 On the l^final day of court, the trial court observed the following regarding the inclusion of an instruction regarding the statutory cap in its charge to the jury: The defense has vigorously opposed the jury being advised of the cap even though initially I believe it was a motion in limine or a propos | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.
green
2 sentences2006Scherk v. Alberto-Culver *836 Co., 417 U.S. 506 , 519 n. 14, 94 S.Ct. 2449 , 2457 n. 14, 41 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974). 2006Scherk v. Alberto-Culver *836 Co., 417 U.S. 506 , 519 n. 14, 94 S.Ct. 2449 , 2457 n. 14, 41 L.Ed.2d 270 (1974). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Rowell
green
1 sentence1988While no single factor is necessarily determinative of reasonableness, the inclusion of safeguards against unbridled discretion in field officers weighs most heavily in tilting the balancing test in favor of reasonableness. [5] In State v. Rowell, 517 So.2d 799 (1988), this court did not hold that blood tests for alcohol content can never be conducted under proper procedures, but rather held that the regulations then in effect were insufficient to insure the reliability of the test results which could otherwise be used in court to conclusively establish drunkenness. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Succession of Martin
green
1 sentence1982Effect of inclusion of claim in petition or in tableau of distribution The inclusion of the claim of a creditor of the succession in the succession representative's petition for authority to pay debts or in his tableau of distribution creates a prima facie presumption of the validity of the claim; and the burden of proving the invalidity thereof shall be upon the person opposing it." *1232 See also Succession of Martin, 335 So.2d 494 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1976), writ denied, 337 So.2d 516 (La.1976). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
State v. Johnson
neutral
1 sentence1982Effect of inclusion of claim in petition or in tableau of distribution The inclusion of the claim of a creditor of the succession in the succession representative's petition for authority to pay debts or in his tableau of distribution creates a prima facie presumption of the validity of the claim; and the burden of proving the invalidity thereof shall be upon the person opposing it." *1232 See also Succession of Martin, 335 So.2d 494 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1976), writ denied, 337 So.2d 516 (La.1976). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.