Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People Ex Rel. Natgreen1 sentence2026People in Interest of N.A.T., 134 P.3d 535, 537 (Colo. App. 2006). | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Leasecomm Corp.green1 sentence2006Co., 925 F.Supp. 1491, 1493 (D.Colo.1996) (same); Ex parte Leasecomm Corp., 879 So.2d 1156, 1158-59 (Ala. 2003) (same); Golden Palm Hospitality, Inc. v. Stearns Bank, 874 So.2d 1231, 1235-36 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2004) (same). | 1 | 1 |
Golden Palm Hospitality, Inc. v. STEARNS BANK NATL. ASS'Ngreen1 sentence2006Co., 925 F.Supp. 1491, 1493 (D.Colo.1996) (same); Ex parte Leasecomm Corp., 879 So.2d 1156, 1158-59 (Ala. 2003) (same); Golden Palm Hospitality, Inc. v. Stearns Bank, 874 So.2d 1231, 1235-36 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2004) (same). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 751587green1 sentence2006Rather, it means that an arbitration or forum-selection clause in a contract is not enforceable if the inclusion of that clause in the contract was the product of fraud or coercion." (citation omitted)); see also Richards v. Lloyd's of London, 135 F.3d 1289 , 1296-97 (9th Cir.1998) (same); REO Sales, Inc. v. Prudential Ins. | 1 | 1 |
REO Sales, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of Americagreen1 sentence2006Co., 925 F.Supp. 1491, 1493 (D.Colo.1996) (same); Ex parte Leasecomm Corp., 879 So.2d 1156, 1158-59 (Ala. 2003) (same); Golden Palm Hospitality, Inc. v. Stearns Bank, 874 So.2d 1231, 1235-36 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.2004) (same). | 1 | 1 |
Ifc Credit Corporation v. Aliano Brothers General Contractors, Inc.green1 sentence2006Contractors, Inc., supra, 437 F.3d at 610 (potential defendants would not agree to the inclusion of such a clause in their contracts if they thought it would put them at a disadvantage should the parties have a dispute that resulted in litigation, unless they were compensated for assuming that risk). | 1 | 1 |
Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District v. Board of County Commissionersgreen1 sentence1996Compare Vidler, 197 Colo, at 417, 594 P.2d at 568 (“To recognize conditional decrees grounded on no interest beyond a desire to obtain water for sale would—as a practical matter—discourage those who have need and use for the water from developing it.”) with Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy Dist. v. Board of County Comm’rs of Arapahoe County, 841 P.2d 1061, 1065 (Colo.1992) (requirement of diligence prevents “ ‘the accumulation of conditional water rights without diligent efforts to complete the projects to the detriment of those needing and seeking to make immediate beneficial use of the | 1 | 1 |
Colorado River Water Conservation District v. Vidler Tunnel Water Co.green1 sentence1996Compare Vidler, 197 Colo, at 417, 594 P.2d at 568 (“To recognize conditional decrees grounded on no interest beyond a desire to obtain water for sale would—as a practical matter—discourage those who have need and use for the water from developing it.”) with Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy Dist. v. Board of County Comm’rs of Arapahoe County, 841 P.2d 1061, 1065 (Colo.1992) (requirement of diligence prevents “ ‘the accumulation of conditional water rights without diligent efforts to complete the projects to the detriment of those needing and seeking to make immediate beneficial use of the | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Montoya
green
1 sentence2018Accordingly, the instruction did not contain “abstract legal principles unrelated to the issues in controversy.” Montoya, 928 P.2d at 784 . ¶ 92 Thus, we conclude that the inclusion of this instruction, even if superfluous, could not have confused the jury, especially because it was very brief and contained a correct statement of the law. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
City of Thornton v. Bijou Irrigation Co.
green
1 sentence2011As we continued, "the inclusion of this requirement is consistent with the purpose underlying both the anti-speculation doctrine and the diligence requirements, ie.], preserving unappropriated water for users with legitimate, documentable needs." Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
People v. McCauley
green
2 sentences1977If the statute is constitutionally firm without the element of knowledge, it is certainly valid to include the necessity to prove knowledge or circumstances which should reasonably lead one to know that the victim is a peace officer and this inclusion serves as a beneficial inurement to anyone charged under the statute." Likewise, in People v. McCauley, supra , we approved a "reasonableness" standard in an affirmative defense, noting that "this case involves an attack upon a provision which was not constitutionally required and which provided a `beneficial inurement to anyone charged under the 1977If the statute is constitutionally firm without the element of knowledge, it is certainly valid to include the necessity to prove knowledge or circumstances which should reasonably lead one to know that the victim is a peace officer and this inclusion serves as a beneficial inurement to anyone charged under the statute." Likewise, in People v. McCauley, supra , we approved a "reasonableness" standard in an affirmative defense, noting that "this case involves an attack upon a provision which was not constitutionally required and which provided a `beneficial inurement to anyone charged under the | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Thomas C. Bogus, Trustee in the Matter of Jacob Rosenblum, Bankrupt v. The American National Bank of Cheyenne, Wyoming
green
1 sentence1976In Bogus v. American National Bank, 401 F.2d 458 (10th Cir.), a bank took a security interest in bar supplies, equipment and a liquor license. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
People v. Del Toro
green
2 sentences1972McEwen v. United States, 390 F.2d 47 (9th Cir. *250 1968); People v. Del Toro, 155 Colo. 487 , 395 P.2d 357 . 1972McEwen v. United States, 390 F.2d 47 (9th Cir. *250 1968); People v. Del Toro, 155 Colo. 487 , 395 P.2d 357 . | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Lillian Jo McEwen AKA Lillian Jo Ramus, AKA Lillian Jo Paeper v. United States
green
1 sentence1972McEwen v. United States, 390 F.2d 47 (9th Cir. *250 1968); People v. Del Toro, 155 Colo. 487 , 395 P.2d 357 . | 1 | 1972–1972 |
O'BRIEN v. Wallace
green
2 sentences1971O'Brien v. Wallace, 145 Colo. 291 , 359 P.2d 1029 . 1971O'Brien v. Wallace, 145 Colo. 291 , 359 P.2d 1029 . | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.