9 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Maassgreen2 sentences2005See State v. Maass, 275 Kan. 328, 330 , 64 P.3d 382 (2003). 2005See State v. Maass, 275 Kan. 328, 330 , 64 P.3d 382 (2003). | 1 | 1 |
Lindsey v. Miami County National Bankgreen2 sentences2004See Lindsey v. Miami County National Bank, 267 Kan. 685, 689-90 , 984 P.2d 719 (1999). 2004See Lindsey v. Miami County National Bank, 267 Kan. 685, 689-90 , 984 P.2d 719 (1999). | 1 | 1 |
Babe Houser Motor Co. v. Tetreaultgreen2 sentences2002See Babe Houser Motor Co. v. Tetreault, 270 Kan. 502, 506 , 14 P.3d 1149 (2000). 2002See Babe Houser Motor Co. v. Tetreault, 270 Kan. 502, 506 , 14 P.3d 1149 (2000). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Sanders v. United States
green
2 sentences1971Ed. 2d 148 , 83 S. Ct. 1068 .) We might add that irrespective of the fact that this was appellant’s third motion, the ground urged was so insubstantial in nature that the motion could be summarily denied by the sentencing court without the necessity of the appointment of counsel, the presence of petitioner, and a plenary hearing. 1966(Sanders v. United States, 373 U. S. 1 , 10 L. | 2 | 1966–1971 |
Chappell v. State
neutral
2 sentences1967(See Smith v. State, 196 Kan. 438 , 411 P. 2d 663 ; Chappell v. State, 197 Kan. 407 , 416 P. 2d 786 ; Davis v. State, 197 Kan. 576 , 419 P. 2d 832 ; and cases therein cited.) The petitioner urges, nonetheless, that the trial court was obliged to hold a plenary hearing on his motion for the purpose of deter *297 mining whether his confession was legally obtained and properly admitted in evidence at his trial. 1967(See Smith v. State, 196 Kan. 438 , 411 P. 2d 663 ; Chappell v. State, 197 Kan. 407 , 416 P. 2d 786 ; Davis v. State, 197 Kan. 576 , 419 P. 2d 832 ; and cases therein cited.) The petitioner urges, nonetheless, that the trial court was obliged to hold a plenary hearing on his motion for the purpose of deter *297 mining whether his confession was legally obtained and properly admitted in evidence at his trial. | 2 | 1967–1967 |
Rodgers v. State
neutral
1 sentence2009If it shall appear at a pretrial conference or upon any other proceeding before the court that the petitioner’s statements are uncorroborated then such uncorroborated statements of the petitioner could very well be found insubstantial and insufficient to justify the production of the prisoner at a full plenary hearing.” 197 Kan. at 625 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
King v. State
green
2 sentences1970(Baier v. State, 197 Kan. 602 , 419 P. 2d 865 ; King v. State, 200 Kan. 461 , 436 P. 2d 855 .) The judgment denying relief on petitioner’s motion is affirmed. 1970(Baier v. State, 197 Kan. 602 , 419 P. 2d 865 ; King v. State, 200 Kan. 461 , 436 P. 2d 855 .) The judgment denying relief on petitioner’s motion is affirmed. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Baier v. State
green
2 sentences1970(Baier v. State, 197 Kan. 602 , 419 P. 2d 865 ; King v. State, 200 Kan. 461 , 436 P. 2d 855 .) The judgment denying relief on petitioner’s motion is affirmed. 1970(Baier v. State, 197 Kan. 602 , 419 P. 2d 865 ; King v. State, 200 Kan. 461 , 436 P. 2d 855 .) The judgment denying relief on petitioner’s motion is affirmed. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Smith v. State
neutral
2 sentences1967(See Smith v. State, 196 Kan. 438 , 411 P. 2d 663 ; Chappell v. State, 197 Kan. 407 , 416 P. 2d 786 ; Davis v. State, 197 Kan. 576 , 419 P. 2d 832 ; and cases therein cited.) The petitioner urges, nonetheless, that the trial court was obliged to hold a plenary hearing on his motion for the purpose of deter *297 mining whether his confession was legally obtained and properly admitted in evidence at his trial. 1967(See Smith v. State, 196 Kan. 438 , 411 P. 2d 663 ; Chappell v. State, 197 Kan. 407 , 416 P. 2d 786 ; Davis v. State, 197 Kan. 576 , 419 P. 2d 832 ; and cases therein cited.) The petitioner urges, nonetheless, that the trial court was obliged to hold a plenary hearing on his motion for the purpose of deter *297 mining whether his confession was legally obtained and properly admitted in evidence at his trial. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Escobedo v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1967It is suggested that the guidelines formulated by the federal Supreme Court in Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U. S. 478 , 12 L. 1967It is suggested that the guidelines formulated by the federal Supreme Court in Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 U. S. 478 , 12 L. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Davis v. State
neutral
2 sentences1967(See Smith v. State, 196 Kan. 438 , 411 P. 2d 663 ; Chappell v. State, 197 Kan. 407 , 416 P. 2d 786 ; Davis v. State, 197 Kan. 576 , 419 P. 2d 832 ; and cases therein cited.) The petitioner urges, nonetheless, that the trial court was obliged to hold a plenary hearing on his motion for the purpose of deter *297 mining whether his confession was legally obtained and properly admitted in evidence at his trial. 1967(See Smith v. State, 196 Kan. 438 , 411 P. 2d 663 ; Chappell v. State, 197 Kan. 407 , 416 P. 2d 786 ; Davis v. State, 197 Kan. 576 , 419 P. 2d 832 ; and cases therein cited.) The petitioner urges, nonetheless, that the trial court was obliged to hold a plenary hearing on his motion for the purpose of deter *297 mining whether his confession was legally obtained and properly admitted in evidence at his trial. | 1 | 1967–1967 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.