Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Virgin Islands opinions name it 2 courts 2013–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virgin Islands courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rivera-Moreno v. Government of the Virgin Islandsgreen2 sentences2024See Rivera–Moreno v. Gov't of the V.I., 61 V.I. 279, 314 (V.I. 2014) (“[w]hen . . . this Court applies a plenary standard of review to the underlying Superior Keating-Smith v. Mustafa 2024 VI 12 S. Ct. Civ. 2017Rivera-Moreno, 61 V.I. at 314 (“When, on appeal, this Court applies a plenary standard of review to the underlying Superior Court decision, it can, ‘in the interests of judicial economy, exercise [its] discretion’ to overlook the Superior Court’s procedural error and analyze the legal issue for the first time on appeal.”) (quoting Browne v. Gore, 57 V.I. 445 , 453 n.5 (V.I. 2012)). | 4 | 4 |
KEATING-SMITH v. MUSTAFAgreen1 sentence2024See Rivera–Moreno v. Gov't of the V.I., 61 V.I. 279, 314 (V.I. 2014) (“[w]hen . . . this Court applies a plenary standard of review to the underlying Superior Keating-Smith v. Mustafa 2024 VI 12 S. Ct. Civ. | 1 | 1 |
Feddersen v. Feddersengreen1 sentence2017Accord Feddersen v. Feddersen, 41 V.I. 230, 236 (D.V.I. | 1 | 1 |
Browne v. Goregreen1 sentence2016“Instead, questions of law are reviewed under a plenary standard,” id., which means the Appellate Division “must provide sufficient analysis to demonstrate that it has truly performed a full review of the record.” Browne v. Gore, 54 V.I. 195, 202-03 (Super. | 1 | 1 |
Bradford v. Cramergreen1 sentence2016Bradford v. Cramer, 54 V.I. 669, 671 (V.I. 2011) (citing St. | 1 | 1 |
Walters v. Parrottgreen1 sentence2016We review findings of fact under a clearly erroneous standard, Walters v. Parrott, 58 V.I. 391, 411 (V.I. 2013), and we review the application of law to those facts under a plenary standard. | 1 | 1 |
Estate of Ludington v. Jabergreen1 sentence2013Carty v. People, 56 V.I. 345, 354 (V.I. 2012); Estate of Ludington v. Jaber, 54 V.I. 678, 681 (V.I. 2011). | 1 | 1 |
Carty v. Peoplegreen1 sentence2013Carty v. People, 56 V.I. 345, 354 (V.I. 2012); Estate of Ludington v. Jaber, 54 V.I. 678, 681 (V.I. 2011). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virgin Islands. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Browne v. Gore
green
2 sentences2017Rivera-Moreno, 61 V.I. at 314 (“When, on appeal, this Court applies a plenary standard of review to the underlying Superior Court decision, it can, ‘in the interests of judicial economy, exercise [its] discretion’ to overlook the Superior Court’s procedural error and analyze the legal issue for the first time on appeal.”) (quoting Browne v. Gore, 57 V.I. 445 , 453 n.5 (V.I. 2012)). 2016Ct. App. Div. 2011), rev’d on other grounds, 57 V.I. 445 (V.I. 2012). | 3 | 2014–2017 |
United Corp. v. Tutu Park Ltd.
green
1 sentence2014Browne, 57 V.I. at 453 n.5 (citing United Corp. v. Tutu Park Ltd., 55 V.I. 702 , 708 n.3 (V.I. 2011)). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.