Atkins hearing in Louisiana

9 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 2003–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Williamsred la · 2002 · cited in 5 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2003–2018 2 sentences 2018State v. Williams , 01-1650, pp. 22-24 (La. 11/1/02), 831 So.2d 835 , 853-54. 4 At the Atkins hearing, the experts were split on whether Robertson met the criteria for intellectual disability. 2018State v. Williams , 01-1650, pp. 22-24 (La. 11/1/02), 831 So.2d 835 , 853-54. 4 At the Atkins hearing, the experts were split on whether Robertson met the criteria for intellectual disability.	2	5
State v. Dunngreen la · 2008 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010Id. 2010Id.	1	1
Morejon v. United Statesgreen scotus · 2005 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 1 sentence 2008See State v. Manning, XXXX-XXXX p. 74 (La. 10/19/04), 885 So.2d 1044, 1107 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 967 , 125 S.Ct. 1745 , 161 L.Ed.2d 612 (2005)(evidence in the record insufficient to warrant remand for consideration of Atkins claim).	1	1
Manning v. Louisianagreen scotus · 2005 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 1 sentence 2008See State v. Manning, XXXX-XXXX p. 74 (La. 10/19/04), 885 So.2d 1044, 1107 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 967 , 125 S.Ct. 1745 , 161 L.Ed.2d 612 (2005)(evidence in the record insufficient to warrant remand for consideration of Atkins claim).	1	1
State v. Manninggreen la · 2004 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008 1 sentence 2008See State v. Manning, XXXX-XXXX p. 74 (La. 10/19/04), 885 So.2d 1044, 1107 , cert. denied, 544 U.S. 967 , 125 S.Ct. 1745 , 161 L.Ed.2d 612 (2005)(evidence in the record insufficient to warrant remand for consideration of Atkins claim).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (40)

Case	Cited	Years
Miller v. Cain neutral la · 2008 2 sentences 2010To the extent that the procedure approved in Miller v. Cain, 08-0716 (La.4/16/08), 979 So.2d 1271 , in which the district court exercised its discretion to bifurcate the Atkins claim from post-conviction claims, is inconsistent with this order, it is superceded. 2010To the extent that the procedure approved in Miller v. Cain, 08-0716 (La.4/16/08), 979 So.2d 1271 , in which the district court exercised its discretion to bifurcate the Atkins claim from post-conviction claims, is inconsistent with this order, it is superceded.	2	2010–2010
Atkins v. Virginia green scotus · 2002 2 sentences 2018We have reviewed Robertson's claim and find no reason to disturb the district court's ruling. 3 In Atkins v. Virginia , 536 U.S. 304 , 122 S.Ct. 2242 , 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), the Supreme Court held that the execution of mentally retarded persons (now referred to as intellectually disabled) constitutes excessive punishment, and therefore violates the Eighth Amendment. 2018We have reviewed Robertson's claim and find no reason to disturb the district court's ruling. 3 In Atkins v. Virginia , 536 U.S. 304 , 122 S.Ct. 2242 , 153 L.Ed.2d 335 (2002), the Supreme Court held that the execution of mentally retarded persons (now referred to as intellectually disabled) constitutes excessive punishment, and therefore violates the Eighth Amendment.	1	2018–2018
Brumfield v. Cain green lamd · 2012 2 sentences 2018Brumfield v. Cain , 854 F.Supp.2d 366 , 404 (M.D. 2018Brumfield v. Cain , 854 F.Supp.2d 366 , 404 (M.D.	1	2018–2018
State v. Bell green la · 2010 2 sentences 2017The district court also granted the defense’s Motion to Determine Defendant’s I.Q. but declined to resolve the Atkins claim pre-trial, because the parties did not agree to leave this determination up to the court pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. 905.5.1, which states, "The jury shall try the issue of mental retardation of a capital defendant during the capital sentencing hearing unless the state and the defendant agree that the issue is to be tried by the judge.” Bell , 09-0199, p. 2, 53 So.3d at 439-40 . . 2017The district court also granted the defense’s Motion to Determine Defendant’s I.Q. but declined to resolve the Atkins claim pre-trial, because the parties did not agree to leave this determination up to the court pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. 905.5.1, which states, "The jury shall try the issue of mental retardation of a capital defendant during the capital sentencing hearing unless the state and the defendant agree that the issue is to be tried by the judge.” Bell , 09-0199, p. 2, 53 So.3d at 439-40 . .	1	2017–2017
Whitaker v. Alabama green scotus · 1999 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
Wiggins v. Squires green scotus · 1999 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
Harvey v. Department of Justice green scotus · 1999	1	2008–2008
Dunlap v. PECO Energy Co. green scotus · 1999 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
Binstock v. New Jersey Division of Motor Vehicles green scotus · 1999 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
State v. Davis green la · 1994 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
Roper v. Simmons green scotus · 2005 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
State v. Tyler green la · 1998 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
State v. Ford green la · 1986 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
State v. Deal green la · 2001 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
State v. Hampton green la · 1999	1	2008–2008
State v. Edwards green la · 1999	1	2008–2008
State v. Felde green la · 1982	1	2008–2008
State v. Wilson neutral la · 2005	1	2008–2008
Berrios Quinones v. New York green scotus · 1999	1	2008–2008
Votta v. Gnazzo green scotus · 1999 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
Potts v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice green scotus · 1999	1	2008–2008
Scarbrough v. G A B Robins green scotus · 1999	1	2008–2008
Coulibaly v. Immigration & Naturalization Service green scotus · 1999 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
Lenoir v. Kerley green scotus · 1999 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
Deal v. Louisiana neutral scotus · 2002 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
Kipp v. California green scotus · 2002 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
Harrower v. United States green scotus · 2002	1	2008–2008
Smedley v. Pierce green scotus · 2002	1	2008–2008
Miller v. Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District green scotus · 2002 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
State v. Irish green la · 2002 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
State v. Draughn green la · 2007	1	2008–2008
State v. Code green la · 1993	1	2008–2008
State v. Cooks green la · 1998 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
In re Broadway green scotus · 1983 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
Cotner v. Gardner green scotus · 1983	1	2008–2008
Keller v. McDaniel green scotus · 1983	1	2008–2008
Mann v. Oklahoma green scotus · 1994 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
Beasley v. United States green scotus · 1994 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
Brifis v. United States green scotus · 1994 2 sentences 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William 2008Here, we likewise find no objection and no prejudice. [230] State v. Holmes, 2006 -2988, appeal presently pending in this Court; State v. Coleman, XXXX-XXXX (same); State v. Campbell, XXXX-XXXX (present case); State v. Draughn, XXXX-XXXX (La.1/17/07), 950 So.2d 583 ; State v. Wilson, XXXX-XXXX (La.3/30/05), 899 So.2d 551 (death sentence vacated in light of Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 , 125 S.Ct. 1183 , 161 L.Ed.2d 1 (2005) because Wilson was a minor at the time of the offenses; resentenced to life imprisonment without benefit of parole, probation or suspension of sentence); State v. William	1	2008–2008
State Ex Rel. Edwards v. Cain neutral la · 2003	1	2003–2003

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:149.1 (3) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:567 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 43 (1988–2024) PA 39 (2004–2021) OH 33 (2004–2026) MS 30 (1990–2026) AL 23 (2000–2026) FL 12 (1989–2025) LA 9 (2003–2018) CA 9 (1976–2025) OK 6 (1991–2020) TN 5 (2006–2016) KY 5 (2005–2026) VA 4 (2000–2019) AR 4 (2004–2020) NY 4 (1992–2019) IN 3 (2014–2020) NJ 3 (2004–2006) UT 3 (2012–2020) AZ 3 (2006–2017) ID 3 (2013–2021) IL 2 (2012–2021) MI 2 (1977–2016) MD 2 (2011–2012) WV 2 (1982–2004) OR 2 (2015–2020) MO 2 (2021–2021)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check

Your account

Appearance