making waiver in Michigan

9 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1922–1992 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

Case	Followed	Cited
Robert R. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Companygreen · 1908 · cited in 2 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1940–1988 2 sentences 1988In Prentis v Atlantic Coast Line Co, 211 US 210, 226-227 ; 29 S Ct 67 ; 53 L Ed 150 (1908), the Supreme Court stated: The establishment of a rate is the making of a rule for the future, and therefore is an act legislative, not judicial, in kind, as seems to be fully recognized by the supreme court of appeals . . . and especially by its learned president in his pointed remarks .... . . . 1940“The establishment of a rate is the making of a rule for the future, and therefore is an act legislative, not judicial, in kind.” Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co., 211 U. S. 210, 226 (29 Sup. Ct. 67).	1	2
Flagg v. Peoplegreen mich · 1879 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., Flagg v People, 40 Mich 706 (1879); People v Stewart, 75 Mich 21 ; 42 NW 662 (1889); People v Dudgeon, 229 Mich 26 ; 201 NW 355 (1924); People v Hamilton, 359 Mich 410 ; 102 NW2d 738 (1960). 1992See, e.g., Flagg v People, 40 Mich 706 (1879); People v Stewart, 75 Mich 21 ; 42 NW 662 (1889); People v Dudgeon, 229 Mich 26 ; 201 NW 355 (1924); People v Hamilton, 359 Mich 410 ; 102 *167 NW2d 738 (1960).	1	1
Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.green scotus · 1916 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1961–1961 2 sentences 1961Co. v. Blish Milling Co., 241 US 190, 193 ( 36 S Ct 541 , 60 L ed 948), held that a telegram identifying the shipment and stating “We will make claim against railroad for entire contents of car at invoice price,” was in substance the making of a claim within the meaning of the stipulation, the object of which was to secure reasonable notice. 1961Co. v. Blish Milling Co., 241 US 190, 193 ( 36 S Ct 541 , 60 L ed 948), held that a telegram identifying the shipment and stating “We will make claim against railroad for entire contents of car at invoice price,” was in substance the making of a claim within the meaning of the stipulation, the object of which was to secure reasonable notice.	1	1
Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Woodgreen mich · 1898 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1954–1954 1 sentence 1954We think the rule recognized in Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Wood, 115 Mich 444, 448, 449 , is applicable in the case at bar.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (13)

Case	Cited	Years
People v. Dudgeon neutral mich · 1924 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., Flagg v People, 40 Mich 706 (1879); People v Stewart, 75 Mich 21 ; 42 NW 662 (1889); People v Dudgeon, 229 Mich 26 ; 201 NW 355 (1924); People v Hamilton, 359 Mich 410 ; 102 NW2d 738 (1960). 1992See, e.g., Flagg v People, 40 Mich 706 (1879); People v Stewart, 75 Mich 21 ; 42 NW 662 (1889); People v Dudgeon, 229 Mich 26 ; 201 NW 355 (1924); People v Hamilton, 359 Mich 410 ; 102 NW2d 738 (1960).	1	1992–1992
People v. Stewart green mich · 1889 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., Flagg v People, 40 Mich 706 (1879); People v Stewart, 75 Mich 21 ; 42 NW 662 (1889); People v Dudgeon, 229 Mich 26 ; 201 NW 355 (1924); People v Hamilton, 359 Mich 410 ; 102 NW2d 738 (1960). 1992See, e.g., Flagg v People, 40 Mich 706 (1879); People v Stewart, 75 Mich 21 ; 42 NW 662 (1889); People v Dudgeon, 229 Mich 26 ; 201 NW 355 (1924); People v Hamilton, 359 Mich 410 ; 102 NW2d 738 (1960).	1	1992–1992
People v. Hamilton green mich · 1960 2 sentences 1992See, e.g., Flagg v People, 40 Mich 706 (1879); People v Stewart, 75 Mich 21 ; 42 NW 662 (1889); People v Dudgeon, 229 Mich 26 ; 201 NW 355 (1924); People v Hamilton, 359 Mich 410 ; 102 NW2d 738 (1960). 1992See, e.g., Flagg v People, 40 Mich 706 (1879); People v Stewart, 75 Mich 21 ; 42 NW 662 (1889); People v Dudgeon, 229 Mich 26 ; 201 NW 355 (1924); People v Hamilton, 359 Mich 410 ; 102 NW2d 738 (1960).	1	1992–1992
Garfield v. United States Ex Rel. Allison green scotus · 1908 1 sentence 1988In Prentis v Atlantic Coast Line Co, 211 US 210, 226-227 ; 29 S Ct 67 ; 53 L Ed 150 (1908), the Supreme Court stated: The establishment of a rate is the making of a rule for the future, and therefore is an act legislative, not judicial, in kind, as seems to be fully recognized by the supreme court of appeals . . . and especially by its learned president in his pointed remarks .... . . .	1	1988–1988
People v. Reagan green mich · 1975 2 sentences 1982People v Reagan, 395 Mich 306, 314 ; 235 NW2d 581 (1975). 1982People v Reagan, 395 Mich 306, 314 ; 235 NW2d 581 (1975).	1	1982–1982
Allen v. Board of State Auditors green mich · 1899 1 sentence 1962We think that it sufficiently apprised the carrier of the character of the claim, for while it stated that the claim was for the entire contents of the car ‘at invoice price’ this did not constitute such a variance from the claim for the value of the flour as to be misleading; and it is plain that no prejudice resulted.” In addition to the foregoing see Allen v. Board of State Auditors, 122 Mich 324 (47 LRA 117, 80 Am St Rep 573), and Dawlen Corp. v. New York Central R.	1	1962–1962
Snyder v. King green mich · 1917 1 sentence 1961This Court in Snyder v. King, 199 Mich 345 (1 ALR. 893), with reference to a contention plaintiff: shipper could not recover because he did not file a verified claim within 5 days as required under a uniform contract provision, stated (pp 355-357): “In our opinion the only serious question here involved is whether there was a substantial compliance with the 5-day requirement.	1	1961–1961
Moss v. Warns green wis · 1944 2 sentences 1952In support of the contention, decisions from other States are cited, of which Moss v. Warns, 245 Wis 587 ( 15 NW2d 786 , 156 ALR 598 ), is typical. 1952In support of the contention, decisions from other States are cited, of which Moss v. Warns, 245 Wis 587 ( 15 NW2d 786 , 156 ALR 598 ), is typical.	1	1952–1952
Campbell v. Quackenbush green mich · 1876 1 sentence 1922The general rule is well settled in this State that where one comes into lawful possession of personal property demand for its surrender is a prerequisite to an action in replevin. 2 Abbott’s Mich. Practice (2d Ed.), p. 1581; 1 Stevens’ Mich. Practice, p. 257; Campbell v. Quackenbush, 33 Mich. 287 ; Adams v. Wood, 51 Mich. 411 ; Wiggins v. Snow, 89 Mich. 477 ; Anderson v. Pendl, 153 Mich. 693 ; Detroit Safe Co. v. Myer, 192 Mich. 215 ; Stuber-Stone & Co. v. Ault, 215 Mich. 355 .	1	1922–1922
Adams v. Wood green mich · 1883 1 sentence 1922The general rule is well settled in this State that where one comes into lawful possession of personal property demand for its surrender is a prerequisite to an action in replevin. 2 Abbott’s Mich. Practice (2d Ed.), p. 1581; 1 Stevens’ Mich. Practice, p. 257; Campbell v. Quackenbush, 33 Mich. 287 ; Adams v. Wood, 51 Mich. 411 ; Wiggins v. Snow, 89 Mich. 477 ; Anderson v. Pendl, 153 Mich. 693 ; Detroit Safe Co. v. Myer, 192 Mich. 215 ; Stuber-Stone & Co. v. Ault, 215 Mich. 355 .	1	1922–1922
Anderson v. Pendl neutral mich · 1908 1 sentence 1922The general rule is well settled in this State that where one comes into lawful possession of personal property demand for its surrender is a prerequisite to an action in replevin. 2 Abbott’s Mich. Practice (2d Ed.), p. 1581; 1 Stevens’ Mich. Practice, p. 257; Campbell v. Quackenbush, 33 Mich. 287 ; Adams v. Wood, 51 Mich. 411 ; Wiggins v. Snow, 89 Mich. 477 ; Anderson v. Pendl, 153 Mich. 693 ; Detroit Safe Co. v. Myer, 192 Mich. 215 ; Stuber-Stone & Co. v. Ault, 215 Mich. 355 .	1	1922–1922
Detroit Safe Co. v. Myer neutral mich · 1916 1 sentence 1922The general rule is well settled in this State that where one comes into lawful possession of personal property demand for its surrender is a prerequisite to an action in replevin. 2 Abbott’s Mich. Practice (2d Ed.), p. 1581; 1 Stevens’ Mich. Practice, p. 257; Campbell v. Quackenbush, 33 Mich. 287 ; Adams v. Wood, 51 Mich. 411 ; Wiggins v. Snow, 89 Mich. 477 ; Anderson v. Pendl, 153 Mich. 693 ; Detroit Safe Co. v. Myer, 192 Mich. 215 ; Stuber-Stone & Co. v. Ault, 215 Mich. 355 .	1	1922–1922
Stuber-Stone & Co. v. Ault neutral mich · 1921 1 sentence 1922The general rule is well settled in this State that where one comes into lawful possession of personal property demand for its surrender is a prerequisite to an action in replevin. 2 Abbott’s Mich. Practice (2d Ed.), p. 1581; 1 Stevens’ Mich. Practice, p. 257; Campbell v. Quackenbush, 33 Mich. 287 ; Adams v. Wood, 51 Mich. 411 ; Wiggins v. Snow, 89 Mich. 477 ; Anderson v. Pendl, 153 Mich. 693 ; Detroit Safe Co. v. Myer, 192 Mich. 215 ; Stuber-Stone & Co. v. Ault, 215 Mich. 355 .	1	1922–1922

Where else courts name it

CA 39 (1922–2025) IL 33 (1899–2024) TX 18 (1888–2019) MA 17 (1921–2025) LA 16 (1907–2022) PA 14 (1912–2012) NY 13 (1926–2012) WI 13 (1921–2024) NJ 11 (1969–2016) NE 10 (1908–2022) MI 9 (1922–1992) KY 9 (1928–2025) GA 8 (1895–2010) IN 7 (1948–2019) AZ 7 (1910–2015) AL 7 (1875–1997) MD 6 (1913–1997) OR 6 (1972–2026) OK 5 (1925–1952) MO 5 (1937–2021) KS 5 (1920–2001) CO 5 (1910–2001) DC 5 (1972–1995) AR 4 (1929–2013) OH 4 (1991–2026) VA 4 (1897–1975) WA 4 (1909–1932) NC 4 (1881–2003) ID 4 (1938–2011) MS 4 (1979–1994) VT 3 (1911–1954) MT 3 (1921–1997) NH 3 (1914–1980) IA 3 (1975–2022) AK 2 (1977–1984) WY 2 (1928–1954) SD 2 (1958–1978) HI 2 (1912–1982) FL 2 (1987–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check