Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1907–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Anderson v. Ichinosegreen2 sentences2022In Anderson v. Ichinose, 98-2157 (La. 9/8/99), 760 So. 2d 302 , the court stated: With the development of a more complex society, it became more reasonable, particularly with respect to the activities of professionals, to insure against the making of claims, rather than the happening of occurrences, and “claims made” insurance developed to meet a need for professionals to insure against the making of the claim as the insured event, rather than having to struggle with traditional concepts and difficulties inherent in determining whether the “event” insured against was the commission of an act, 2018In Anderson v. Ichinose, 98-2157, pp. 5-6 (La. 9/8/99), 760 So.2d 302 , 305, the court quoted a "seminal statement" on the subject of claims-made versus occurrence policies from Sol Kroll, The Professional Liability Policy "Claims Made," 13 Forum 842, 843 (1978), as follows: With the development of a more complex society, it became more reasonable, particularly with respect to the activities of professionals, to insure against the making of claims, rather than the happening of occurrences, and "claims made" insurance developed to meet a need for professionals to insure against the making of a | 1 | 8 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Regions Bank v. Kountz
green
1 sentence2018Further, in Regions Bank v. Kountz, 05-1106, p. 6 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/31/06), 931 So.2d 506 , 511 (citation omitted), this court stated as follows in differentiating claims-made policies: Pure claims-made policies shift to the insured only the risk of claims incurred but not made, whereas claims-made-and-reported policies shift the risks both of claims incurred but not made and of claims made but not reported. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Maryland
green
2 sentences2016In Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Maryland, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 1327 , 182 L.Ed.2d 296 (2012), the United States Supreme Court expressed that, “A foundational premise of the federal system is that States, as sovereigns, are immune from suits for damages, unless they elect to waive that defense,” J^The Louisiana Supreme Court dealt with sovereign immunity in the context of an FMLA claim in Holliday v. Board of Supervisors of LSU Agricultural and Mechanical College, 2014-0585 (La.10/15/14), 149 So.3d 227 . 2016In Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Maryland, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 1327 , 182 L.Ed.2d 296 (2012), the United States Supreme Court expressed that, “A foundational premise of the federal system is that States, as sovereigns, are immune from suits for damages, unless they elect to waive that defense,” J^The Louisiana Supreme Court dealt with sovereign immunity in the context of an FMLA claim in Holliday v. Board of Supervisors of LSU Agricultural and Mechanical College, 2014-0585 (La.10/15/14), 149 So.3d 227 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Cynthia Holliday v. Board of Supervisors of Lsu Agricultural and Mechanical College, Etc.
green
1 sentence2016In Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Maryland, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 1327 , 182 L.Ed.2d 296 (2012), the United States Supreme Court expressed that, “A foundational premise of the federal system is that States, as sovereigns, are immune from suits for damages, unless they elect to waive that defense,” J^The Louisiana Supreme Court dealt with sovereign immunity in the context of an FMLA claim in Holliday v. Board of Supervisors of LSU Agricultural and Mechanical College, 2014-0585 (La.10/15/14), 149 So.3d 227 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Hood v. Cotter
green
1 sentence2011Hood v. Cotter, 2008-0215 (La.12/2/08), 5 So.3d 819 , quoting Sol Kroll, “The Professional Liability Policy ‘Claims Made,’ ” 13 Forum 842, 843 (1978); Guthrie v. Louisiana Medical Mut. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Burns v. CLD, INC.
neutral
1 sentence2006Burns v. CLD, Inc., 38,998 (La.App.2d Cir.10/27/04), 886 So.2d 607 , writ denied, 2004-2906 (La.2/18/05), 896 So.2d 31 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Burns v. CLD, INC.
green
1 sentence2006Burns v. CLD, Inc., 38,998 (La.App.2d Cir.10/27/04), 886 So.2d 607 , writ denied, 2004-2906 (La.2/18/05), 896 So.2d 31 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Garfield v. United States Ex Rel. Allison
green
1 sentence2003Prentiss[Prentis] v. Atlantic Coast Line Co., 211 U.S. 210 , 29 S.Ct. 67 [, 53 L.Ed. 150 ] (1908). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Robert R. Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Company
green
1 sentence2003Prentiss[Prentis] v. Atlantic Coast Line Co., 211 U.S. 210 , 29 S.Ct. 67 [, 53 L.Ed. 150 ] (1908). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Scott v. Corkern
green
2 sentences1981Sheffield v. Norris, 235 La. 667 , 105 So.2d 260 ; Scott v. Corkern, 231 La. 368 , 91 So.2d 569 and other cases cited by plaintiffs indicate that "[i]t is essential to the validity of an assignment of a right or claim to a third person that the transferor deliver a title to the transferee." Accordingly, without the specific written assignment which Maryland tried to obtain in December of 1974, Maryland had no rights to the contract funds on October 1, 1975, and was well aware of the need for Lambert's signature on some sort of "assignment of accounts receivable." During the trial, Maryland's P 1981Sheffield v. Norris, 235 La. 667 , 105 So.2d 260 ; Scott v. Corkern, 231 La. 368 , 91 So.2d 569 and other cases cited by plaintiffs indicate that "[i]t is essential to the validity of an assignment of a right or claim to a third person that the transferor deliver a title to the transferee." Accordingly, without the specific written assignment which Maryland tried to obtain in December of 1974, Maryland had no rights to the contract funds on October 1, 1975, and was well aware of the need for Lambert's signature on some sort of "assignment of accounts receivable." During the trial, Maryland's P | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Sheffield v. Norris
green
2 sentences1981Sheffield v. Norris, 235 La. 667 , 105 So.2d 260 ; Scott v. Corkern, 231 La. 368 , 91 So.2d 569 and other cases cited by plaintiffs indicate that "[i]t is essential to the validity of an assignment of a right or claim to a third person that the transferor deliver a title to the transferee." Accordingly, without the specific written assignment which Maryland tried to obtain in December of 1974, Maryland had no rights to the contract funds on October 1, 1975, and was well aware of the need for Lambert's signature on some sort of "assignment of accounts receivable." During the trial, Maryland's P 1981Sheffield v. Norris, 235 La. 667 , 105 So.2d 260 ; Scott v. Corkern, 231 La. 368 , 91 So.2d 569 and other cases cited by plaintiffs indicate that "[i]t is essential to the validity of an assignment of a right or claim to a third person that the transferor deliver a title to the transferee." Accordingly, without the specific written assignment which Maryland tried to obtain in December of 1974, Maryland had no rights to the contract funds on October 1, 1975, and was well aware of the need for Lambert's signature on some sort of "assignment of accounts receivable." During the trial, Maryland's P | 1 | 1981–1981 |
In Re Stelly's Estate
green
1 sentence1963We reiterate our observation "In re Stelly's Estate", La.App., 185 So. 637 , page 640, as follows: "The surviving spouse does not acquire the usufruct of the interest of the deceased spouse by inheritance, and for that reason she owes no inheritance tax on the value of that usufruct. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Moon v. State
green
2 sentences1926In Moon v. State, 22 Ariz. 418 , 198 P. 288 , 16 A. L. 1926In Moon v. State, 22 Ariz. 418 , 198 P. 288 , 16 A. L. | 1 | 1926–1926 |
Reynolds v. Boland
green
1 sentence1907Judge 52 A. 19 -21 the Court said: “This Court has decided that a judgment of the Court making the rule absolute, as was made in this case, is not required to be signed (Fox vs. | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.