Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Boy Scouts of America v. Dalegreen2 sentences2021The Supreme Court began its analysis by determining whether the petitioner was protected by the First Amendment’s expressive associational right, which only extends to groups that “engage in some form of expression, whether it be public or private.” Id. at 648 . 2021The petitioner, a private, nonprofit organization engaged in “helping to instill values in young people and, in other ways, to prepare them to make ethical choices over their lifetime in achieving their full potential.” Id. at 666, 649 (quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Shay v. Aldrich
green
1 sentence2025Id. at 660 (citing MCL 600.2925d(a)). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Morgan v. Taylor
green
1 sentence2024The Supreme Court began its analysis by explaining its prior decision in Morgan v Taylor, 434 Mich 180 ; 451 NW2d 2 The court denied summary disposition of the intentional misrepresentation claim. -3- 852 (1990), in which the Court explained the “last treatment rule” in the context of optometry. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Turner v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n
green
1 sentence2024The Supreme Court began its analysis by concluding “that the property damage arose out of the use of a motor vehicle as a motor vehicle” because “the destruction of the building arose out of the use of the truck as a motor vehicle.” Id. at 32 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Levy v. Martin
green
1 sentence2024Levy, 463 Mich at 483 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Jones v. Flowers
green
1 sentence2019The Supreme Court began its analysis by noting that due process does not require actual notice, only “ ‘notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.’ ” Id. at 226 , quoting Mullane v Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co, 339 US 306, 314 ; 70 S Ct 652 ; 94 L Ed 865 (1950). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield
green
1 sentence2019Id. at 612- 613. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
green
2 sentences2019The Supreme Court began its analysis by noting that due process does not require actual notice, only “ ‘notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.’ ” Id. at 226 , quoting Mullane v Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co, 339 US 306, 314 ; 70 S Ct 652 ; 94 L Ed 865 (1950). 2019The Supreme Court began its analysis by noting that due process does not require actual notice, only “ ‘notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.’ ” Id. at 226 , quoting Mullane v Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co, 339 US 306, 314 ; 70 S Ct 652 ; 94 L Ed 865 (1950). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Patrick v. Young Men's Christian Ass'n
green
2 sentences2014The Supreme Court began its analysis by examining the plat: “If the plat was valid, and conveyed an absolute fee to the religious society, it is manifestly the end of the plaintiffs’ claim, because Richardson then parted with his entire title.” Id. at 189 . 2014The Court continued, “If it was valid, but did not convey the fee, the plaintiffs must show that they own the reversionary interest.” Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Elezovic v. Ford Motor Co.
green
2 sentences2007The Supreme Court noted that "the statute expressly defines an `employer' as a `person,' which is defined under MCL 37.2103(g) to include a corporation, and also states that an `employer' includes an `agent of that person.' MCL 37.2201(a)." Id. at 419-420 , 697 N.W.2d 851 . 2007The Supreme Court noted that “the statute expressly defines an ‘employer’ as a ‘person,’ which is defined under MCL 37.2103(g) to include a corporation, and also states that an ‘employer’ includes an ‘agent of that person.’ MCL 37.2201(a).” Id. at 419-420 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Alabama v. White
green
1 sentence1993White, supra at 328 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Adams v. Williams
green
2 sentences1993The Supreme Court began its analysis by recalling its decision in Adams v Williams, supra. In Adams , the majority concluded that the information provided by a known informant, though unverified, carried with it sufficient indicia of reliability to justify an investigative stop and weapons search. 1993The Supreme Court began its analysis by recalling its decision in Adams v Williams, supra . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.