9 New Jersey opinions name it 1 courts 2010–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sickles v. Cabot Corp.green2 sentences2010The reviewing court is assessing only the legal sufficiency of the claim, Sickles v. Cabot Corp., 379 N.J.Super. 100, 106 , 877 A.2d 267 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 185 N.J. 297 , 884 A.2d 1267 (2005), so “[a]t this preliminary stage of the litigation the Court is not concerned with the ability of plaintiffs to prove the allegation contained in the complaint.” Printing Mart, supra, 116 N.J. at 746 , 563 A.2d 31 . 2010The reviewing court is assessing only the legal sufficiency of the claim, Sickles v. Cabot Corp., 379 N.J.Super. 100, 106 , 877 A.2d 267 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 185 N.J. 297 , 884 A.2d 1267 (2005), so “[a]t this preliminary stage of the litigation the Court is not concerned with the ability of plaintiffs to prove the allegation contained in the complaint.” Printing Mart, supra, 116 N.J. at 746 , 563 A.2d 31 . | 7 | 8 |
Frederick v. Smithgreen1 sentence2021"A complaint should be dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 4:6- 2(e) only if 'the factual allegations are palpably insufficient to support a claim upon which relief can be granted.'" Frederick v. Smith, 416 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Thomas
green
1 sentence2010The reviewing court is assessing only the legal sufficiency of the claim, Sickles v. Cabot Corp., 379 N.J.Super. 100, 106 , 877 A.2d 267 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 185 N.J. 297 , 884 A.2d 1267 (2005), so “[a]t this preliminary stage of the litigation the Court is not concerned with the ability of plaintiffs to prove the allegation contained in the complaint.” Printing Mart, supra, 116 N.J. at 746 , 563 A.2d 31 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.
green
2 sentences2010The reviewing court is assessing only the legal sufficiency of the claim, Sickles v. Cabot Corp., 379 N.J.Super. 100, 106 , 877 A.2d 267 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 185 N.J. 297 , 884 A.2d 1267 (2005), so “[a]t this preliminary stage of the litigation the Court is not concerned with the ability of plaintiffs to prove the allegation contained in the complaint.” Printing Mart, supra, 116 N.J. at 746 , 563 A.2d 31 . 2010The reviewing court is assessing only the legal sufficiency of the claim, Sickles v. Cabot Corp., 379 N.J.Super. 100, 106 , 877 A.2d 267 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 185 N.J. 297 , 884 A.2d 1267 (2005), so “[a]t this preliminary stage of the litigation the Court is not concerned with the ability of plaintiffs to prove the allegation contained in the complaint.” Printing Mart, supra, 116 N.J. at 746 , 563 A.2d 31 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.