Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
15 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re Disciplinary Action Against Rambowgreen2 sentences2024When reviewing the dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim, we “review the legal sufficiency of the claim de novo to determine whether the complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.” Graphic Commc’ns Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund “A” v. CVS Caremark Corp., 850 N.W.2d 682, 692 (Minn. 2014). 2016“When a case is dismissed . . . for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted, [an appellate court] review[s] the legal sufficiency of the claim de novo to determine whether the complaint sets forth a legally sufficient claim for relief.” Graphic Commc’ns Local 1B Health & Welfare Fund A v. CVC Caremark Corp., 850 N.W.2d 682, 692 (Minn. 2014). 6 Appellant challenges the district court’s dismissal of counts I, III, IV, V, and VI of his second amended complaint, arguing that the district court erred by concluding that (1) these claims were barred by the statute of limitations and | 7 | 7 |
Bahr v. CAPELLA UNIVERSITYgreen2 sentences2016Bahr v. Capella Univ., 788 N.W.2d 76, 80 (Minn.2010). 2015Bahr v. Capella Univ., 788 N.W.2d 76, 80 (Minn. 2010). | 2 | 5 |
Laura L. Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A.green1 sentence2024We “accept the facts alleged in the complaint as true and construe all reasonable inferences in favor of the nonmoving party.” Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 851 N.W.2d 598, 606 (Minn. 2014). | 1 | 1 |
Hebert v. City of Fifty Lakesgreen2 sentences2010Hebert v. City of Fifty Lakes, 744 N.W.2d 226, 229 (Minn.2008). 2010Hebert v. City of Fifty Lakes, 744 N.W.2d 226, 229 (Minn.2008). | 1 | 1 |
Leonard v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.green1 sentence2002Leonard v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 605 N.W.2d 425, 428 (Minn.App.2000), review denied (Minn. Apr. 18, 2000); see Minn. R. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Obst v. Microtron, Inc.
green
2 sentences2009The proper standard to apply when assessing the legal sufficiency of a claim under the whistleblower statute is to assume that the facts have occurred as reported and then determine, as we said in Abraham , whether those facts “constitute a violation of law or rule adopted pursuant to law.” 639 N.W.2d at 355 (citing Obst, 614 N.W.2d at 204 ). 2009The proper standard to apply when assessing the legal sufficiency of a claim under the whistleblower statute is to assume that the facts have occurred as reported and then determine, as we said in Abraham , whether those facts "constitute a violation of law or rule adopted pursuant to law." 639 N.W.2d at 355 (citing Obst, 614 N.W.2d at 204 ). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Abraham v. County of Hennepin
green
2 sentences2009The proper standard to apply when assessing the legal sufficiency of a claim under the whistleblower statute is to assume that the facts have occurred as reported and then determine, as we said in Abraham , whether those facts “constitute a violation of law or rule adopted pursuant to law.” 639 N.W.2d at 355 (citing Obst, 614 N.W.2d at 204 ). 2009The proper standard to apply when assessing the legal sufficiency of a claim under the whistleblower statute is to assume that the facts have occurred as reported and then determine, as we said in Abraham , whether those facts "constitute a violation of law or rule adopted pursuant to law." 639 N.W.2d at 355 (citing Obst, 614 N.W.2d at 204 ). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.