Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 New Mexico opinions name it 2 courts 1961–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Mexico courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Trujillo v. Berrygreen2 sentences2013“The purpose of a motion to dismiss 8 for failure to state a claim for relief is to test the legal sufficiency of the claim, not the 9 facts that support it.” Trujillo v. Berry, 106 N.M. 86, 87 , 738 P.2d 1331, 1332 (Ct. 10 App. 1987 ). 11 {15} In this case, Dr. Ramoso did not file a motion for reconsideration following 12 denial of her summary judgment motion, nor did she attempt to re-argue the issue in 13 the context of her second motion to dismiss. 2013“The purpose of a motion to dismiss 8 for failure to state a claim for relief is to test the legal sufficiency of the claim, not the 9 facts that support it.” Trujillo v. Berry, 106 N.M. 86, 87 , 738 P.2d 1331, 1332 (Ct. 10 App. 1987 ). 11 {15} In this case, Dr. Ramoso did not file a motion for reconsideration following 12 denial of her summary judgment motion, nor did she attempt to re-argue the issue in 13 the context of her second motion to dismiss. | 3 | 4 |
Ramer v. Place-Gallegosgreen2 sentences2009Lab. v. Am. 11 Hollow Boring Co., 1997-NMCA-025 , ¶ 32, 123 N.M. 170 , 936 P.2d 852 (stating that 12 “[w]e review the case litigated below, not the case that is fleshed out for the first time 13 on appeal” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Ramer v. Place-Gallegos, 14 118 N.M. 363, 365 , 881 P.2d 723, 725 (Ct. App. 1994) (“A motion to dismiss for 15 failure to state a claim tests the legal sufficiency of that claim, not the supporting 16 facts.”), overruled on other grounds by Spectron Dev. 2009Lab. v. Am. 11 Hollow Boring Co., 1997-NMCA-025 , ¶ 32, 123 N.M. 170 , 936 P.2d 852 (stating that 12 “[w]e review the case litigated below, not the case that is fleshed out for the first time 13 on appeal” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Ramer v. Place-Gallegos, 14 118 N.M. 363, 365 , 881 P.2d 723, 725 (Ct. App. 1994) (“A motion to dismiss for 15 failure to state a claim tests the legal sufficiency of that claim, not the supporting 16 facts.”), overruled on other grounds by Spectron Dev. | 2 | 2 |
Wells v. County of Valenciagreen2 sentences2009Lab., 1997-NMCA-025 , ¶ 31. 17 Plaintiff also contends that the trial court erred because it could be assumed that 18 she has asserted a constitutional claim based upon Myers’ violation of her right to 19 privacy. [MIO 5, 8-10] She reasserts her contention that a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1996) 9 1 violation is supplemental to any state remedy and cites to Wells v. County of Valencia, 2 98 N.M. 3 , 644 P.2d 517 (1982), in support of that contention. [MIO 8-9] See id. at 3 6, 644 P.2d at 520 (stating that, although a claim for a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 violation can 4 arise from tortious conduct, it is distin 2009Lab., 1997-NMCA-025 , ¶ 31. 17 Plaintiff also contends that the trial court erred because it could be assumed that 18 she has asserted a constitutional claim based upon Myers’ violation of her right to 19 privacy. [MIO 5, 8-10] She reasserts her contention that a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1996) 9 1 violation is supplemental to any state remedy and cites to Wells v. County of Valencia, 2 98 N.M. 3 , 644 P.2d 517 (1982), in support of that contention. [MIO 8-9] See id. at 3 6, 644 P.2d at 520 (stating that, although a claim for a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 violation can 4 arise from tortious conduct, it is distin | 1 | 1 |
McCasland v. Prathergreen2 sentences2002STANDARD OF REVIEW {6} A Rule 1-012(B)(6) motion to dismiss tests the legal sufficiency of the claim; that is, it tests “the law of the claim, not the facts that support it.” McCasland v. Prather, 92 N.M. 192, 194 , 585 P.2d 336, 338 (Ct.App.1978). 2002STANDARD OF REVIEW {6} A Rule 1-012(B)(6) motion to dismiss tests the legal sufficiency of the claim; that is, it tests “the law of the claim, not the facts that support it.” McCasland v. Prather, 92 N.M. 192, 194 , 585 P.2d 336, 338 (Ct.App.1978). | 1 | 1 |
Garner v. Department of Correctionsgreen2 sentences2000This is so because the very purpose of a motion to dismiss is to “test the legal sufficiency of the claim.” Garner v. Department of Corrections, 120 N.M. 547, 548 , 903 P.2d 858, 859 (Ct.App.1995). 2000This is so because the very purpose of a motion to dismiss is to “test the legal sufficiency of the claim.” Garner v. Department of Corrections, 120 N.M. 547, 548 , 903 P.2d 858, 859 (Ct.App.1995). | 1 | 1 |
Blea v. City of Espanolagreen2 sentences1997Blea v. City of Espanola, 117 N.M. 217, 218 , 870 P.2d 755, 756 (Ct.App.1994); Trujillo v. Berry, 106 N.M. 86, 87 , 738 P.2d 1331, 1332 (Ct.App.1987). 3. 1997Blea v. City of Espanola, 117 N.M. 217, 218 , 870 P.2d 755, 756 (Ct.App.1994); Trujillo v. Berry, 106 N.M. 86, 87 , 738 P.2d 1331, 1332 (Ct.App.1987). 3. | 1 | 1 |
Edgington v. New Mexicogreen2 sentences1996See Vandolsen v. Constructors, Inc., 101 N.M. 109 , 678 P.2d 1184 (Ct.App.) (squarely addressing constitutionality of statute after dismissal by trial court for failure to state a claim), cert. denied, 101 N.M. 77 , 678 P.2d 705 (1984); see also State v. Edgington, 99 N.M. 715 , 663 P.2d 374 (Ct.App.) (same), certs. denied, 99 N.M. 644 , 662 P.2d 645 and 464 U.S. 940 , 104 S.Ct. 354 , 78 L.Ed.2d 318 (1983). 8. 1996See Vandolsen v. Constructors, Inc., 101 N.M. 109 , 678 P.2d 1184 (Ct.App.) (squarely addressing constitutionality of statute after dismissal by trial court for failure to state a claim), cert. denied, 101 N.M. 77 , 678 P.2d 705 (1984); see also State v. Edgington, 99 N.M. 715 , 663 P.2d 374 (Ct.App.) (same), certs. denied, 99 N.M. 644 , 662 P.2d 645 and 464 U.S. 940 , 104 S.Ct. 354 , 78 L.Ed.2d 318 (1983). 8. | 1 | 1 |
Callaway v. NM DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSgreen1 sentence1996Because the constitutionality of Section 3-12-1.1 is a question of law, and a Rule 1—012(B)(6) motion tests the legal sufficiency of the claim and not the facts that support it, Callaway v. New Mexico Dep’t of Corrections, 117 N.M. 637, 639 , 875 P.2d 393, 395 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 118 N.M. 90 , 879 P.2d 91 (1994), we review the merits of Appellants’ constitutional claim de novo. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Edgingtongreen2 sentences1996See Vandolsen v. Constructors, Inc., 101 N.M. 109 , 678 P.2d 1184 (Ct.App.) (squarely addressing constitutionality of statute after dismissal by trial court for failure to state a claim), cert. denied, 101 N.M. 77 , 678 P.2d 705 (1984); see also State v. Edgington, 99 N.M. 715 , 663 P.2d 374 (Ct.App.) (same), certs. denied, 99 N.M. 644 , 662 P.2d 645 and 464 U.S. 940 , 104 S.Ct. 354 , 78 L.Ed.2d 318 (1983). 8. 1996See Vandolsen v. Constructors, Inc., 101 N.M. 109 , 678 P.2d 1184 (Ct.App.) (squarely addressing constitutionality of statute after dismissal by trial court for failure to state a claim), cert. denied, 101 N.M. 77 , 678 P.2d 705 (1984); see also State v. Edgington, 99 N.M. 715 , 663 P.2d 374 (Ct.App.) (same), certs. denied, 99 N.M. 644 , 662 P.2d 645 and 464 U.S. 940 , 104 S.Ct. 354 , 78 L.Ed.2d 318 (1983). 8. | 1 | 1 |
Vandolsen Ex Rel. Price v. Constructors, Inc.green2 sentences1996See Vandolsen v. Constructors, Inc., 101 N.M. 109 , 678 P.2d 1184 (Ct.App.) (squarely addressing constitutionality of statute after dismissal by trial court for failure to state a claim), cert. denied, 101 N.M. 77 , 678 P.2d 705 (1984); see also State v. Edgington, 99 N.M. 715 , 663 P.2d 374 (Ct.App.) (same), certs. denied, 99 N.M. 644 , 662 P.2d 645 and 464 U.S. 940 , 104 S.Ct. 354 , 78 L.Ed.2d 318 (1983). 8. 1996See Vandolsen v. Constructors, Inc., 101 N.M. 109 , 678 P.2d 1184 (Ct.App.) (squarely addressing constitutionality of statute after dismissal by trial court for failure to state a claim), cert. denied, 101 N.M. 77 , 678 P.2d 705 (1984); see also State v. Edgington, 99 N.M. 715 , 663 P.2d 374 (Ct.App.) (same), certs. denied, 99 N.M. 644 , 662 P.2d 645 and 464 U.S. 940 , 104 S.Ct. 354 , 78 L.Ed.2d 318 (1983). 8. | 1 | 1 |
Roybal v. Whitegreen2 sentences1985See Roybal v. White, 72 N.M. 285 , 383 P.2d 250 (1963); Hardin v. Farris, 87 N.M. 143 , 530 P.2d 407 (Ct.App.1974). 1985See Roybal v. White, 72 N.M. 285 , 383 P.2d 250 (1963); Hardin v. Farris, 87 N.M. 143 , 530 P.2d 407 (Ct.App.1974). | 1 | 1 |
Harrison v. Lucerogreen2 sentences1981See Harrison v. Lucero, 86 N.M. 581 , 525 P.2d 941 (Ct.App.1974). 1981See Harrison v. Lucero, 86 N.M. 581 , 525 P.2d 941 (Ct.App.1974). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Mexico. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Saylor v. Valles
green
2 sentences2019Saylor v. Valles, 2003-NMCA-037, ¶ 6 , 133 N.M. 432 , 63 P.3d 1152 . 2019Saylor v. Valles, 2003-NMCA-037, ¶ 6 , 133 N.M. 432 , 63 P.3d 1152 . | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Spectron Development Laboratory v. American Hollow Boring Co.
green
2 sentences2009Lab. v. Am. 11 Hollow Boring Co., 1997-NMCA-025 , ¶ 32, 123 N.M. 170 , 936 P.2d 852 (stating that 12 “[w]e review the case litigated below, not the case that is fleshed out for the first time 13 on appeal” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Ramer v. Place-Gallegos, 14 118 N.M. 363, 365 , 881 P.2d 723, 725 (Ct. App. 1994) (“A motion to dismiss for 15 failure to state a claim tests the legal sufficiency of that claim, not the supporting 16 facts.”), overruled on other grounds by Spectron Dev. 2009Lab. v. Am. 11 Hollow Boring Co., 1997-NMCA-025 , ¶ 32, 123 N.M. 170 , 936 P.2d 852 (stating that 12 “[w]e review the case litigated below, not the case that is fleshed out for the first time 13 on appeal” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Ramer v. Place-Gallegos, 14 118 N.M. 363, 365 , 881 P.2d 723, 725 (Ct. App. 1994) (“A motion to dismiss for 15 failure to state a claim tests the legal sufficiency of that claim, not the supporting 16 facts.”), overruled on other grounds by Spectron Dev. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Callaway v. New Mexico Department of Corrections
green
1 sentence1996Because the constitutionality of Section 3-12-1.1 is a question of law, and a Rule 1—012(B)(6) motion tests the legal sufficiency of the claim and not the facts that support it, Callaway v. New Mexico Dep’t of Corrections, 117 N.M. 637, 639 , 875 P.2d 393, 395 (Ct.App.), cert. denied, 118 N.M. 90 , 879 P.2d 91 (1994), we review the merits of Appellants’ constitutional claim de novo. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Hardin v. Farris
green
2 sentences1985See Roybal v. White, 72 N.M. 285 , 383 P.2d 250 (1963); Hardin v. Farris, 87 N.M. 143 , 530 P.2d 407 (Ct.App.1974). 1985See Roybal v. White, 72 N.M. 285 , 383 P.2d 250 (1963); Hardin v. Farris, 87 N.M. 143 , 530 P.2d 407 (Ct.App.1974). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
American MacHine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.
neutral
1 sentence1961American Machine & Metals v. De Bothezat Impeller Co., D.C., 82 F.Supp. 556 and cases cited therein; Clay v. Callaway, (5 CCA 1949), 177 F.2d 741 , 13 F.R.Serv. 16.28. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Clay v. Callaway
neutral
1 sentence1961American Machine & Metals v. De Bothezat Impeller Co., D.C., 82 F.Supp. 556 and cases cited therein; Clay v. Callaway, (5 CCA 1949), 177 F.2d 741 , 13 F.R.Serv. 16.28. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Irving Trust Co. v. United States
green
2 sentences1961Kasco Mills v. Ferebee, supra [ 197 Va. 589 , 90 S.E.2d 670 ]; Irving Trust Co. v. United States, (2 CCA 1955), 221 F.2d 303 , cert. denied 350 U.S. 828 , 76 S.Ct. 59 , 100 L.Ed. 740 ; Lynn v. Smith, supra. Numerous cases have held that a pretrial order may pass judgment upon the legal sufficiency of a defense. 1961Kasco Mills v. Ferebee, supra [ 197 Va. 589 , 90 S.E.2d 670 ]; Irving Trust Co. v. United States, (2 CCA 1955), 221 F.2d 303 , cert. denied 350 U.S. 828 , 76 S.Ct. 59 , 100 L.Ed. 740 ; Lynn v. Smith, supra. Numerous cases have held that a pretrial order may pass judgment upon the legal sufficiency of a defense. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Kasco Mills, Inc. v. Ferebee
green
1 sentence1961Kasco Mills v. Ferebee, supra [ 197 Va. 589 , 90 S.E.2d 670 ]; Irving Trust Co. v. United States, (2 CCA 1955), 221 F.2d 303 , cert. denied 350 U.S. 828 , 76 S.Ct. 59 , 100 L.Ed. 740 ; Lynn v. Smith, supra. Numerous cases have held that a pretrial order may pass judgment upon the legal sufficiency of a defense. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Irving Trust Company and Ernest Crawford May, as Executors of the Will of Charles H. Hastings, Deceased v. United States
green
1 sentence1961Kasco Mills v. Ferebee, supra [ 197 Va. 589 , 90 S.E.2d 670 ]; Irving Trust Co. v. United States, (2 CCA 1955), 221 F.2d 303 , cert. denied 350 U.S. 828 , 76 S.Ct. 59 , 100 L.Ed. 740 ; Lynn v. Smith, supra. Numerous cases have held that a pretrial order may pass judgment upon the legal sufficiency of a defense. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.