9 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1955–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerthgreen2 sentences2026It noted that “if an employer delegates the authority to control the work environment to a supervisor and that supervisor abuses that delegated authority, then vicarious liability under § 219(2)(d) will follow.” Ibid. 4 The Court prescribed factors in Lehmann to guide “[t]he determination of whether a supervisor who creates a hostile work environment was aided in accomplishing that tort by the power delegated to him or her to control the day-to-day working environment,” explaining that the factfinder must conduct a fact-specific analysis to decide (1) whether the employer delegated the authori 2026Ibid. | 1 | 1 |
Faragher v. City of Boca Ratongreen1 sentence2026It noted that “if an employer delegates the authority to control the work environment to a supervisor and that supervisor abuses that delegated authority, then vicarious liability under § 219(2)(d) will follow.” Ibid. 4 The Court prescribed factors in Lehmann to guide “[t]he determination of whether a supervisor who creates a hostile work environment was aided in accomplishing that tort by the power delegated to him or her to control the day-to-day working environment,” explaining that the factfinder must conduct a fact-specific analysis to decide (1) whether the employer delegated the authori | 1 | 1 |
Ilda Aguas v. State of New Jersey (072467)green1 sentence2026It noted that “if an employer delegates the authority to control the work environment to a supervisor and that supervisor abuses that delegated authority, then vicarious liability under § 219(2)(d) will follow.” Ibid. 4 The Court prescribed factors in Lehmann to guide “[t]he determination of whether a supervisor who creates a hostile work environment was aided in accomplishing that tort by the power delegated to him or her to control the day-to-day working environment,” explaining that the factfinder must conduct a fact-specific analysis to decide (1) whether the employer delegated the authori | 1 | 1 |
Sumner v. Simpson Univ.green1 sentence2024See Sumner v. Simpson Univ., 238 Cal. Rptr. 3d 207, 221-23 (Ct. App. 2018) (dismissing 26 this Court prescribed a standard for courts to apply when they determine whether a given claim is barred by the exception. | 1 | 1 |
Cantwell v. Connecticutgreen2 sentences1962The oppressive measures adopted, and the cruelties and punishments inflicted by the governments of Europe for many ages, to compel parties to conform, in their religious beliefs and modes of worship, to the views of the most numerous sect, and the folly of attempting in that way to control the mental operations of persons and enforce an outward conformity to a prescribed standard, led to the adoption of [this Amendment].” And in Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U. S. 296, 303-304 , 60 S. Ct. 900 , 84 L. 1962The oppressive measures adopted, and the cruelties and punishments inflicted by the governments of Europe for many ages, to compel parties to conform, in their religious beliefs and modes of worship, to the views of the most numerous sect, and the folly of attempting in that way to control the mental operations of persons and enforce an outward conformity to a prescribed standard, led to the adoption of [this Amendment].” And in Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U. S. 296, 303-304 , 60 S. Ct. 900 , 84 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McKelvey v. Pierce
green
1 sentence2024McKelvey, 173 N.J. at 32 - 33, 51-52. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Stryker Corp. v. Director, Division of Taxation
green
1 sentence2023As observed by our Supreme Court, the CBT Act’s purpose “reflect[s] the recognition that the business activity of a multi-state enterprise within one particular state is inadequately measured by the worth of its assets or income in that state alone but is enhanced by the activity of the entire enterprise.” Stryker Corp., 168 N.J. at 148 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Crisafi
green
2 sentences2014In State v. CHsafi, this Court prescribed the inquiry that trial courts should make when criminal defendants invoke their right to self-representation. 128 N.J. 499, 511-12 , 608 A.2d 317 (1992). 2014In State v. CHsafi, this Court prescribed the inquiry that trial courts should make when criminal defendants invoke their right to self-representation. 128 N.J. 499, 511-12 , 608 A.2d 317 (1992). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Baldwin Const. Co. v. ESSEX COUNTY BD. OF TAXATION AND CITY OF EAST ORANGE
green
2 sentences2002Van Decker, supra, also discusses Baldwin Construction Co. v. Essex County Bd. of Taxation, 16 N.J. 329 , 108 A.2d 598 (1954) in which the court held that assessments which had been arbitrarily increased by the county tax board must be reduced in accord with the uniform rate or measure applied to other properties in the taxing district. 2002Van Decker, supra, also discusses Baldwin Construction Co. v. Essex County Bd. of Taxation, 16 N.J. 329 , 108 A.2d 598 (1954) in which the court held that assessments which had been arbitrarily increased by the county tax board must be reduced in accord with the uniform rate or measure applied to other properties in the taxing district. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Knight v. Jewett
green
2 sentences2001Even a rule violation, in and of itself, is not sufficient to meet that heightened standard, as the court stated: [E]ven when a participant's conduct violates a rule of the game and may subject the violator to internal sanctions prescribed by the sport itself, imposition of legal liability for such conduct might well alter fundamentally the nature of the sport by deterring participants from vigorously engaging in activity that falls close to, but on the permissible side of, a prescribed rule. [Ibid. (quoting Knight, supra, 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 2, 834 P.2d at 696 ).] The court reasoned that a lower s 2001Even a rule violation, in and of itself, is not sufficient to meet that heightened standard, as the court stated: [E]ven when a participant's conduct violates a rule of the game and may subject the violator to internal sanctions prescribed by the sport itself, imposition of legal liability for such conduct might well alter fundamentally the nature of the sport by deterring participants from vigorously engaging in activity that falls close to, but on the permissible side of, a prescribed rule. [Ibid. (quoting Knight, supra, 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 2, 834 P.2d at 696 ).] The court reasoned that a lower s | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Dilger v. Moyles
green
1 sentence2001Even a rule violation, in and of itself, is not sufficient to meet that heightened standard, as the court stated: [E]ven when a participant's conduct violates a rule of the game and may subject *967 the violator to internal sanctions prescribed by the sport itself, imposition of legal liability for such conduct might well alter fundamentally the nature of the sport by deterring participants from vigorously engaging in activity that falls close to, but on the permissible side of, a prescribed rule. [ Ibid. (quoting Knight, supra, 11 Cal. Rptr. 2d 2 , 834 P. 2d at 696 ).] The court reasoned that | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Abbott v. American Cyanamid Co.
green
2 sentences1991In Abbot v. American Cyanamid Co., 844 F. 2d 1108 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed. 2d 248 (1988), the Fourth Circuit was faced with the same issue presented in Hurley, namely, preemption of defective-design and failure-to-warn claims by FDA regulations governing vaccines. 1991In Abbot v. American Cyanamid Co., 844 F.2d 1108 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988), the Fourth Circuit was faced with the same issue presented in Hurley , namely, preemption of defective-design and failure-to-warn claims by FDA regulations governing vaccines. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
James L. Hurley, Jr., Etc. v. Lederle Laboratories Division of American Cyanamid Co., Defendants
green
2 sentences1991Thus, assuming that the FDA has processed all the relevant and available information in arriving at the prescribed warning, its decision as to the proper wording must preempt by implication that of a state. [ Ibid. ] The court limited the inquiry on remand to whether Lederle had withheld information from the FDA; "[o]therwise, the FDA-approved warning is sufficient." Id. at 1543 . 1991Thus, assuming that the FDA has processed all the relevant and available information in arriving at the prescribed warning, its decision as to the proper wording must preempt by implication that of a state. [ Ibid. ] The court limited the inquiry on remand to whether Lederle had withheld information from the FDA; "[o]therwise, the FDA-approved warning is sufficient." Id. at 1543 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
American Cyanamid Co. v. Abbot ex rel. Abbot
green
2 sentences1991In Abbot v. American Cyanamid Co., 844 F. 2d 1108 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed. 2d 248 (1988), the Fourth Circuit was faced with the same issue presented in Hurley, namely, preemption of defective-design and failure-to-warn claims by FDA regulations governing vaccines. 1991In Abbot v. American Cyanamid Co., 844 F.2d 1108 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988), the Fourth Circuit was faced with the same issue presented in Hurley , namely, preemption of defective-design and failure-to-warn claims by FDA regulations governing vaccines. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Garrett v. General Motors Corp.
green
2 sentences1991In Abbot v. American Cyanamid Co., 844 F. 2d 1108 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed. 2d 248 (1988), the Fourth Circuit was faced with the same issue presented in Hurley, namely, preemption of defective-design and failure-to-warn claims by FDA regulations governing vaccines. 1991In Abbot v. American Cyanamid Co., 844 F.2d 1108 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988), the Fourth Circuit was faced with the same issue presented in Hurley , namely, preemption of defective-design and failure-to-warn claims by FDA regulations governing vaccines. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Morison v. United States
green
2 sentences1991In Abbot v. American Cyanamid Co., 844 F. 2d 1108 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed. 2d 248 (1988), the Fourth Circuit was faced with the same issue presented in Hurley, namely, preemption of defective-design and failure-to-warn claims by FDA regulations governing vaccines. 1991In Abbot v. American Cyanamid Co., 844 F.2d 1108 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 908 , 109 S.Ct. 260 , 102 L.Ed.2d 248 (1988), the Fourth Circuit was faced with the same issue presented in Hurley , namely, preemption of defective-design and failure-to-warn claims by FDA regulations governing vaccines. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Complaints of the Taxing Districts v. Middlesex County Equalization Table
neutral
1 sentence1955We subscribe fully to Judge Waesche's reasoning, 25 N.J. | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.