Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1980–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Greco v. Grecogreen2 sentences2015See Greco v. Greco, 70 Conn. App. 735, 740 , 799 A.2d 331 (2002). 2015See Greco v. Greco, 70 Conn. App. 735, 740 , 799 A.2d 331 (2002). | 1 | 1 |
King v. Special Resource Management, Inc.green2 sentences2006Co. v. Cook, 590 S.W.2d 875 (Ky. 1999), the Kentucky Supreme Court declined to apply a harmless error analysis in a case in which the trial court had awarded additional peremptory challenges to only one side, observing that, “[t]o show actual [harm], the complaining litigant would be required to discover the unknowable and to reconstruct what might have been and never was, a jury properly constituted after running the gauntlet of challenge performed in accordance with the prescribed rule[s] of the game.” Id., 877 ; accord Blades v. DaFoe, 704 P.2d 317, 322 (Colo. 1985); see also King v. Specia 2006Co. v. Cook, 590 S.W.2d 875 (Ky. 1999), the Kentucky Supreme Court declined to apply a harmless error analysis in a case in which the trial court had awarded additional peremptory challenges to only one side, observing that, “[t]o show actual [harm], the complaining litigant would be required to discover the unknowable and to reconstruct what might have been and never was, a jury properly constituted after running the gauntlet of challenge performed in accordance with the prescribed rule[s] of the game.” Id., 877 ; accord Blades v. DaFoe, 704 P.2d 317, 322 (Colo. 1985); see also King v. Specia | 1 | 1 |
Blades v. DaFoegreen2 sentences2006Co. v. Cook, 590 S.W.2d 875 (Ky. 1999), the Kentucky Supreme Court declined to apply a harmless error analysis in a case in which the trial court had awarded additional peremptory challenges to only one side, observing that, “[t]o show actual [harm], the complaining litigant would be required to discover the unknowable and to reconstruct what might have been and never was, a jury properly constituted after running the gauntlet of challenge performed in accordance with the prescribed rule[s] of the game.” Id., 877 ; accord Blades v. DaFoe, 704 P.2d 317, 322 (Colo. 1985); see also King v. Specia 2006Co. v. Cook, 590 S.W.2d 875 (Ky.1999), the Kentucky Supreme Court declined to apply a harmless error analysis in a case in which the trial court had awarded additional peremptory challenges to only one side, observing that, "[t]o show actual [harm], the complaining litigant would be required to discover the unknowable and to reconstruct what might have been and never was, a jury properly constituted after running the gauntlet of challenge performed in accordance with the prescribed rule[s] of the game." Id., at 877 ; accord Blades v. DaFoe, 704 P.2d 317, 322 (Colo.1985); see also King v. Speci | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kentucky Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. v. Cook
green
2 sentences2006Co. v. Cook, 590 S.W.2d 875 (Ky. 1999), the Kentucky Supreme Court declined to apply a harmless error analysis in a case in which the trial court had awarded additional peremptory challenges to only one side, observing that, “[t]o show actual [harm], the complaining litigant would be required to discover the unknowable and to reconstruct what might have been and never was, a jury properly constituted after running the gauntlet of challenge performed in accordance with the prescribed rule[s] of the game.” Id., 877 ; accord Blades v. DaFoe, 704 P.2d 317, 322 (Colo. 1985); see also King v. Specia 2006Co. v. Cook, 590 S.W.2d 875 (Ky. 1999), the Kentucky Supreme Court declined to apply a harmless error analysis in a case in which the trial court had awarded additional peremptory challenges to only one side, observing that, “[t]o show actual [harm], the complaining litigant would be required to discover the unknowable and to reconstruct what might have been and never was, a jury properly constituted after running the gauntlet of challenge performed in accordance with the prescribed rule[s] of the game.” Id., 877 ; accord Blades v. DaFoe, 704 P.2d 317, 322 (Colo. 1985); see also King v. Specia | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Williams v. Bartlett
green
1 sentence1992At the prescribed hearing it becomes the burden of the lienor "to establish that there is probable cause to sustain the validity of his claim." Sec. 52-325b (a). "[The] hearing is not intended to be a trial on the merits, nor does it require the plaintiffs to establish their claims by a preponderance of the evidence." Williams v. Bartlett, 189 Conn. 471 , 483 (1983). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Volck v. Muzio
green
1 sentence1991Its evident purpose is to provide sufficient induced of reliability so that the report can be introduced in evidence as an exception to the hearsay rule, especially in license suspension proceedings without the necessity of producing the arresting officer." Volck v. Muzio, 204 Conn. 507 , 518 (1987). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Mastropetre
green
2 sentences1980State v. Mastropetre, 175 Conn. 512, 525 , 400 A.2d 276 (1978). 1980State v. Mastropetre, 175 Conn. 512, 525 , 400 A.2d 276 (1978). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.