9 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1968–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Pagegreen1 sentence2004See id.; see also Page, 81 S.W.3d at 789 . 1 "[A] person acts knowingly with respect to the conduct or to circumstances surrounding the conduct when the person is aware of the nature of the conduct or that the circumstances exist." Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-11-302 (b). -7- III The defendant complains that various statements made by the prosecutor during rebuttal argument amounted to prosecutorial misconduct. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Younggreen1 sentence1999Based upon these factual findings, the trial court did not grant defendant a new trial. 3 III Our standard of review in this matter requires us to afford the trial court's findings "the weight of a jury verdict unless the evidence contained in the record preponderates against his findings." State v. Young, 866 S.W.2d 194, 197 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Newby v. Stategreen2 sentences1976See also, Newby v. State, 215 Tenn. 609 , 388 S.W.2d 136 (1965).’ ” III The defendant was the only eyewitness to the collision, so that, the evidence introduced by the State was all circumstantial in nature. 1976See also, Newby v. State, 215 Tenn. 609 , 388 S.W.2d 136 (1965).’ ” III The defendant was the only eyewitness to the collision, so that, the evidence introduced by the State was all circumstantial in nature. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Batson v. Kentucky
green
1 sentence2002As styled, the argument appears to challenge Ms. Gardner’s dismissal under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986); however, the 4 With regard to dimin ished cap acity, the trial court instructed the jury as fo llows: In this case you have heard evidence that the defendant might have suffered from a mental disease, defect, or co ndition, which could have affected his cap acity to form the culpable m ental state required to commit a crime. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Dominy
green
1 sentence2001In support of his argument, he cites our supreme court’s recent decisions in State v. Burns, 6 S.W.3d 453 (Tenn. 1999), and State v. Dominy, 6 S.W.3d 472 (Tenn. 1999). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Burns
green
1 sentence2001In support of his argument, he cites our supreme court’s recent decisions in State v. Burns, 6 S.W.3d 453 (Tenn. 1999), and State v. Dominy, 6 S.W.3d 472 (Tenn. 1999). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Trusty
red
1 sentence1999The defendant argues his situation is controlled by State v. Trusty, 919 S.W.2d 305 (Tenn. 1996). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Anthony
red
1 sentence1998Thus, we find this challenge to the attempted aggravated kidnapping charge to be without merit. 14 III The defendant next contends that convictions for both attempted first- degree murder and attempted aggravated kidnapping violate the due process guarantees of Article I, Section 8 of the Tennessee Constitution as announced in State v. Anthony, 817 S.W.2d 299 (Tenn. 1991). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Sensing
green
1 sentence1997The fourth Sensing requirement is that “the motorist was observed for the requisite 20 minutes prior to the test, and during the period, he did not have foreign matter in his mouth, did not consume any alcohole beverage, smoke, or regurgitate.” Sensing, 843 S.W.2d at 416 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Stacks v. Veteran's Cab Co.
neutral
2 sentences1968Stacks v. Veteran’s Cab Co. (1962) 51 Tenn.App. 272 , 366 S.W.2d 539 . 1968Stacks v. Veteran’s Cab Co. (1962) 51 Tenn.App. 272 , 366 S.W.2d 539 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.