Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sylvester v. Chicago Park Districtgreen2 sentences2019Id. at 501, 513 . 2018Id. at 501, 513 , 228 Ill.Dec. 698 , 689 N.E.2d 1119 . | 1 | 2 |
Town of Cicero v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicagogreen2 sentences2022Town of Cicero, 2012 IL App (1st) 112164, ¶ 46 . ¶ 26 In the present case, having dismissed counts I and II, which are the causes of action underlying count III’s claim for injunctive relief, the circuit court found that count III necessarily must be dismissed. 2022See id. (there must be a recognized cause of action underlying the claim for injunctive relief). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bruton v. United States
green
2 sentences1998VI) to cross-examine witnesses, as set out in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 20 L. 1998VI) to cross-examine witnesses, as set out in Bruton v. United States, 391 U.S. 123 , 20 L. | 2 | 1998–1998 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences1988The evidence was admitted without objection from defense counsel, and the defendant argues here that the introduction of the evidence was plain error, and, alternatively, that counsel's failure to make an appropriate objection constituted ineffective assistance under Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 . 1988The evidence was admitted without objection from defense counsel, and the defendant argues here that the introduction of the evidence was plain error, and, alternatively, that counsel's failure to make an appropriate objection constituted ineffective assistance under Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 . | 2 | 1987–1988 |
People v. Butler
green
2 sentences2001III The defendant, citing People v. Butler , 58 Ill. 2d 45 , 317 N.E.2d 35 (1974), next contends that continued attempts to impeach him with evidence depicting bad character was improper and denied him of a fair trial. 2001III The defendant, citing People v. Butler , 58 Ill. 2d 45 , 317 N.E.2d 35 (1974), next contends that continued attempts to impeach him with evidence depicting bad character was improper and denied him of a fair trial. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
People v. Albanese
green
1 sentence1987To obtain a new trial or sentencing hearing on grounds of ineffective assistance, a defendant must show both a deficiency in counsel's performance and prejudice resulting from that. ( Strickland v. Washington (1984), 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674, 693 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 ; People v. Albanese (1984), 104 Ill.2d 504, 525 .) To establish actual prejudice resulting from an alleged deficiency in counsel's performance, "[t]he defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.