7 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Cookegreen2 sentences2014Defendant’s brief does concede, however, that Officer Fox leashed Jack before opening the closet door and that “there is no evidence to contradict [Officer Fox’s] testimony” that “he did not order Jack to sniff the bag to nudge it open.” Nevertheless, our review of the trial court’s suppression order is “strictly limited to determining whether the trial judge’s underlying findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, in which event they are conclusively binding on appeal, and whether those factual findings in turn support the judge’s ultimate conclusions of law.” State v. Cooke, 306 N. 2014Defendant’s brief does concede, however, that Officer Fox leashed Jack before opening the closet door and that “there is no evidence to contradict [Officer Fox’s] testimony” that “he did not order Jack to sniff the bag to nudge it open.” Nevertheless, our review of the trial court’s suppression order is “strictly limited to determining whether the trial judge’s underlying findings of fact are supported by competent evidence, in which event they are conclusively binding on appeal, and whether those factual findings in turn support the judge’s ultimate conclusions of law.” State v. Cooke, 306 N. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Greengreen2 sentences2001See State v. Green, 321 N.C. 594, 606 , 365 S.E.2d 587, 594 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 247 , 102 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988). 2001See State v. Green, 321 N.C. 594, 606 , 365 S.E.2d 587, 594 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 247 , 102 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988). | 1 | 1 |
Ashford v. Lynaughgreen2 sentences2001See State v. Green, 321 N.C. 594, 606 , 365 S.E.2d 587, 594 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 102 L. 2001See State v. Green, 321 N.C. 594, 606 , 365 S.E.2d 587, 594 , cert. denied, 488 U.S. 900 , 109 S.Ct. 247 , 102 L.Ed.2d 235 (1988). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Scottgreen2 sentences1998See State v. Scott, 343 N.C. 313, 335 , 471 S.E.2d 605, 618 (1996) (murder victim’s statements falling within 803(3) hearsay exception are relevant to show status of the victim’s relationship with the defendant). *176 III The defendant contends that the trial court erred by not allowing evidence that he loved Mrs. Hayes because this evidence falls within Rule 803(3), the then-existing emotion or state of mind exception to the hearsay rule. 1998See State v. Scott, 343 N.C. 313, 335 , 471 S.E.2d 605, 618 (1996) (murder victim’s statements falling within 803(3) hearsay exception are relevant to show status of the victim’s relationship with the defendant). *176 III The defendant contends that the trial court erred by not allowing evidence that he loved Mrs. Hayes because this evidence falls within Rule 803(3), the then-existing emotion or state of mind exception to the hearsay rule. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Starnes v. Broyhill Furniture Industries
green
1 sentence1996Id. at 516 , 459 S.E.2d at 72 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Sinning v. Clark
green
1 sentence1996Id. at 516 , 459 S.E.2d at 72 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Morrison v. . Cornelius and Others
red
1 sentence1993Morrison v. Cornelius, 63 N.C. 346 (1869). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Miller v. Miller
green
1 sentence1990Id. *57 III The defendant argues that the trial court erred by failing to order a final distribution of the parties’ interest in CDC Management and CDC Associates. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Alexander v. Alexander
green
1 sentence1985The defendant states in his brief that the “trial court failed to consider at all, or make findings on, factors (9), (10), and (11).” In the case Alexander v. Alexander, 68 N.C. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.