Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Passel v. Fort Worth Independent School Districtgreen2 sentences2017See Passel , 440 S.W.2d at 63-64 (stating that civil court may grant injunctive relief to protect personal rights, such as when such relief is "sought to prevent administrative enforcement of an administrative regulation adopted for the purpose of implementing the statute[ ]"); see also Morales , 869 S.W.2d at 946 (stating that in Passel , plaintiffs did not seek a naked declaration of the penal statute's unconstitutionality, but a declaration of the invalidity of the statute and an injunction against enforcement of a school district rule); Destructors, Inc. v. City of Forrest Hill , No. 2-08- 2007Rankin, 905 S.W.2d at 429 - 30; see also Passel, 440 S.W.2d at 64 (court had jurisdiction because plaintiffs sought an injunction against enforcement of a school district rule adopted pursuant to an unconstitutional statute). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Moralesgreen1 sentence2017See Passel , 440 S.W.2d at 63-64 (stating that civil court may grant injunctive relief to protect personal rights, such as when such relief is "sought to prevent administrative enforcement of an administrative regulation adopted for the purpose of implementing the statute[ ]"); see also Morales , 869 S.W.2d at 946 (stating that in Passel , plaintiffs did not seek a naked declaration of the penal statute's unconstitutionality, but a declaration of the invalidity of the statute and an injunction against enforcement of a school district rule); Destructors, Inc. v. City of Forrest Hill , No. 2-08- | 1 | 1 |
Tooke v. City of Mexiagreen1 sentence2007Br. at 3 (citing Tooke v. City of Mexia, 197 S.W.3d 325, 329 (Tex.2006)).) A school district that validly enters into a contract generally “waives sovereign immunity for the purpose of adjudicating a claim for breach of the contract.” Tex. Loc. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dillard v. Austin Independent School District
green
2 sentences2007Id. 2007Id. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
City of San Antonio v. Rankin
green
1 sentence2007Rankin, 905 S.W.2d at 429 - 30; see also Passel, 440 S.W.2d at 64 (court had jurisdiction because plaintiffs sought an injunction against enforcement of a school district rule adopted pursuant to an unconstitutional statute). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Allen v. Lumberton Independent School District
green
1 sentence1990The court of appeals affirmed the judgment, one justice dissenting. 746 S.W.2d 524 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Bernhard v. Kerrville Independent School District
neutral
2 sentences1978The court of civil appeals affirmed the holding of the trial court regarding the School District, but reversed the judgment granting the individual defendants' motion for summary judgment and remanded the cause to the trial court for a new trial. 547 S.W.2d 685 . 1978The court of civil appeals affirmed the holding of the trial court regarding the School District, but reversed the judgment granting the individual defendants’ motion for summary judgment and remanded the cause to the trial court for a new trial. 547 S.W.2d 685 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Spring Branch Independent School District v. Metalab Equipment Co.
green
1 sentence1975Dist., 378 S.W.2d 347 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston, 1964, writ ref., n. r. e.), reversed with per curiam opinion 381 S.W.2d 48 (Tex.Sup., 1964), the Court of Civil Appeals had before it a case in which the trial court had sustained the School District’s plea in abatement and plea to the jurisdiction by reason of the failure of plaintiff’s petition to allege that he had requested a hearing before the Board of Trustees. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Metalab Equipment Co. v. Spring Branch Independent School District
neutral
1 sentence1975Dist., 378 S.W.2d 347 (Tex.Civ.App.—Houston, 1964, writ ref., n. r. e.), reversed with per curiam opinion 381 S.W.2d 48 (Tex.Sup., 1964), the Court of Civil Appeals had before it a case in which the trial court had sustained the School District’s plea in abatement and plea to the jurisdiction by reason of the failure of plaintiff’s petition to allege that he had requested a hearing before the Board of Trustees. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.