9 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1953–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jafar v. Webbgreen2 sentences2019See State v. Otton, 185 Wn.2d 673,685 , 374 P.3d 1108 (2016)("'[W]hen interpreting court rules we are not concemed about usurping the role ofthe legislature because we alone are uniquely positioned to declare the correct interpretation of any court-adopted rule.'" (alteration in original) (quoting Jafar v. Webb, 111 Wn.2d 520, 527 , 303 P.3d 1042 (2013))). -3- Randy Reynolds & Assocs., Inc. v. Harmon, et ah, 95575-1 (Stephens, J., dissenting) a party against whom ajudgment for affirmative reliefis sought has failed to appear, plead, or otherwise defend'" (alteration in original))). 2019See State v. Otton, 185 Wn.2d 673,685 , 374 P.3d 1108 (2016)('"[Wjhen interpreting court rules we are not concerned about usurping the role of the legislature because we alone are uniquely positioned to declare the correct interpretation of any court-adopted rule.'" (alteration in original) (quoting Jafar v. Webb, 177 Wn.2d 520, 527 , 303 P.3d 1042 (2013))). -3- 'Rand^ Reynolds &Assocs., Inc. v. Harmon, et al, 95575-1 (Stephens, J., concurring) a party against whom ajudgment for affirmative reliefis sought has failed to appear, plead, or otherwise defend'" (alteration in original))). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Ottongreen2 sentences2019See State v. Otton, 185 Wn.2d 673,685 , 374 P.3d 1108 (2016)("'[W]hen interpreting court rules we are not concemed about usurping the role ofthe legislature because we alone are uniquely positioned to declare the correct interpretation of any court-adopted rule.'" (alteration in original) (quoting Jafar v. Webb, 111 Wn.2d 520, 527 , 303 P.3d 1042 (2013))). -3- Randy Reynolds & Assocs., Inc. v. Harmon, et ah, 95575-1 (Stephens, J., dissenting) a party against whom ajudgment for affirmative reliefis sought has failed to appear, plead, or otherwise defend'" (alteration in original))). 2019See State v. Otton, 185 Wn.2d 673,685 , 374 P.3d 1108 (2016)("'[W]hen interpreting court rules we are not concemed about usurping the role ofthe legislature because we alone are uniquely positioned to declare the correct interpretation of any court-adopted rule.'" (alteration in original) (quoting Jafar v. Webb, 111 Wn.2d 520, 527 , 303 P.3d 1042 (2013))). -3- Randy Reynolds & Assocs., Inc. v. Harmon, et ah, 95575-1 (Stephens, J., dissenting) a party against whom ajudgment for affirmative reliefis sought has failed to appear, plead, or otherwise defend'" (alteration in original))). | 3 | 3 |
Sargent v. Seattle Police Dept.green2 sentences2016See RCW 42.56.030; Sargent, 179 Wn.2d at 389 (“[expanding the court-made rule [from Newman] to cases that have been referred for charges but rejected by the prosecutor is a sweeping change that is not justified by the express language of the exemption, nor by the public policy favoring disclosure and accountability of government agencies to the public they serve”). ¶25 L&I investigations are unlike open, unsolved criminal investigations. 2016See RCW 42.56.030; Sargent, 179 Wn.2d at 389 ("[e]xpanding the court-made rule [from Newman] to cases that have been referred for charges but rejected by the prosecutor is a sweeping change that is not justified by the express language of the exemption, -10- Wades Eastside Gun Shop, Inc., et al. v. Dep 't ofLabor & Indus., et al., 89629-1 nor by the public policy favoring disclosure and accountability of government agencies to the public they serve"). | 2 | 3 |
State v. Klimesgreen2 sentences2007See State v. Klimes, 117 Wash.App. 758, 769 , 73 P.3d 416 (2003). 2007See State v. Klimes, 117 Wn. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Klimesgreen1 sentence2007See State v. Klimes, 117 Wash.App. 758, 769 , 73 P.3d 416 (2003). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McDonald v. Massachusetts General Hospital
green
2 sentences1953The doctrine declaring charities to be immune from tort liability was first pronounced in this country in McDonald v. Mass. General Hospital, 120 Mass. 432 , 21 Am. 1953The doctrine declaring charities to be immune from tort liability was first pronounced in this country in McDonald v. Mass. General Hospital, 120 Mass. 432 , 21 Am. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.