Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Pennsylvania opinions name it 4 courts 1958–2024 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Catherwood Trustgreen2 sentences1975As was stated in Catherwood Trust, 405 Pa. 61, 77 , 173 A.2d 86, 93 (1961), “[t]here is no vested property rights [sic] in a court-made rule of apportionment.” Although the definition of income or the status of investments may change from one accounting to another, neither court nor legislature may destroy the natural issue’s property rights in the trust income. 1975As was stated in Catherwood Trust, 405 Pa. 61, 77 , 173 A.2d 86, 93 (1961), “[t]here is no vested property rights [sic] in a court-made rule of apportionment.” Although the definition of income or the status of investments may change from one accounting to another, neither court nor legislature may destroy the natural issue’s property rights in the trust income. | 3 | 3 |
Coates v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen1 sentence2024See 34 Pa. Code § 101.21 (a) (“Where a party is not represented by counsel[,] the tribunal before whom the hearing is being held should advise him as to his rights, aid him in examining and cross-examining witnesses, and give him every assistance compatible with the impartial discharge of its official duties.”) See also Coates, 676 A.2d at 744 n.3 (“highlight[ing] the importance of the referee’s responsibility under 34 Pa. Code § 101 .21”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit Insurance
green
2 sentences2021The O’Melveny Court also examined whether federal law preempted state law on the point in question, noting that it “would not contradict an explicit federal statutory provision” and would not “adopt a court-made rule to supplement federal statutory regulation that is comprehensive and detailed[.]” Id. at 85 . 2021The O’Melveny Court also examined whether federal law preempted state law on the point in question, noting that it “would not contradict an explicit federal statutory provision” and would not “adopt a court-made rule to supplement federal statutory regulation that is comprehensive and detailed[.]” Id. at 85 . | 2 | 2021–2021 |
Klein v. Shadyside Health, Education & Research Corp.
green
1 sentence2023It is a court-made doctrine “intended to prevent premature judicial intervention into the administrative process” and “operates as a restraint on the exercise of a court’s equitable powers and a recognition of the legislature’s direction to comply with statutorily-prescribed remedies.” Id. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Empire Sanitary Landfill, Inc. v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2015It is a court-made doctrine “intended to prevent premature judicial intervention into the administrative process” and “operates as a restraint on the exercise of a court’s equitable powers and a recognition of the legislature’s direction to comply with statutorily-prescribed remedies.” Id. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways
green
2 sentences1986Meagher , which was based on the court-made rule of sovereign immunity, was overruled by the Supreme Court in Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways, 479 Pa. 384, 388 A.2d 709 (1978). 1986Meagher , which was based on the court-made rule of sovereign immunity, was overruled by the Supreme Court in Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of Highways, 479 Pa. 384, 388 A.2d 709 (1978). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Cronin v. American Oil Co.
green
2 sentences1979The court-made rule encrusted upon the statute that an employe who sustained injuries while working elsewhere than on the employer’s premises must prove that his employer directed him to work at the place of injury, seems to have had its origin in Cronin v. American Oil Co., 298 Pa. 336 , 148 A. 476 (1929). 1979The court-made rule encrusted upon the statute that an employe who sustained injuries while working elsewhere than on the employer’s premises must prove that his employer directed him to work at the place of injury, seems to have had its origin in Cronin v. American Oil Co., 298 Pa. 336 , 148 A. 476 (1929). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Ass'n
green
2 sentences1958The Supreme Court of Washington, in the case of Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Assn., 43 Wash. 2d 162, 167 , said: “Ordinarily, when a court decides to modify or abandon a court-made rule of long standing, it starts out by saying that ‘the reason for the rule no longer exists.’ In this case, it is correct to say that the ‘reason’ originally given for the rule of immunity never did exist.” Judge Biggs quoted the above paragraph in his Opinion in the Brown v. Moore case, and sententiously added: “We agree with the view that the reason originally given for the rule of immunity never di 1958The Supreme Court of Washington, in the case of Pierce v. Yakima Valley Memorial Hospital Assn., 43 Wash. 2d 162, 167 , said: "Ordinarily, when a court decides to modify or abandon a court-made rule of long standing, it starts out by saying that `the reason for the rule no longer exists.' In this case, it is correct to say that the `reason' originally given for the rule of immunity never did exist." Judge BIGGS quoted the above paragraph in his Opinion in the Brown v. Moore case, and sententiously added: "We agree with the view that the reason originally given for the rule of immunity never di | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.