Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Hernandezgreen2 sentences2019Commonwealth v. Hernandez, 118 N.E.3d 107, 111 (Mass. 2019) (noting that there is “little or no evidence of [abatement ab initio] prior to the late nineteenth century.” (quoting Bevel v. Commonwealth, 717 S.E.2d 789, 792 (Va. 2011))). 2019Commonwealth v. Hernandez, 118 N.E.3d 107, 111 (Mass. 2019) (noting that there is “little or no evidence of [abatement ab initio] prior to the late nineteenth century.” (quoting Bevel v. Commonwealth, 717 S.E.2d 789, 792 (Va. 2011))). | 2 | 2 |
Bevel v. Com.green2 sentences2019Commonwealth v. Hernandez, 118 N.E.3d 107, 111 (Mass. 2019) (noting that there is “little or no evidence of [abatement ab initio] prior to the late nineteenth century.” (quoting Bevel v. Commonwealth, 717 S.E.2d 789, 792 (Va. 2011))). 2019Commonwealth v. Hernandez, 118 N.E.3d 107, 111 (Mass. 2019) (noting that there is “little or no evidence of [abatement ab initio] prior to the late nineteenth century.” (quoting Bevel v. Commonwealth, 717 S.E.2d 789, 792 (Va. 2011))). | 2 | 2 |
Knierim v. Leatherwoodgreen2 sentences2013Courts apply the doctrine to determine whether a plaintiff is “‘properly situated to prosecute the action.’” Petty v. Daimler/Chrysler Corp., 91 S.W.3d 765, 767 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002)(quoting Knierim v. Leatherwood, 542 S.W.2d 806, 808 (Tenn.1976)). 2013Knierim v. Leatherwood, 542 S.W.2d 806, 808 (Tenn. 1976); Garrison v. Stamps, 109 S.W.3d 374, 377 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). | 2 | 2 |
Davis v. Davisgreen2 sentences1991Kilbourne v. Hanzelik, 648 S.W.2d 932, 934 (Tenn.1983) (abolishing discriminatory rule denying liability of wife for support of husband); Davis v. Davis, 657 S.W.2d 753, 758 (Tenn.1983) (abolishing interspousal tort immunity doctrine). 1991See also Kilboume v. Hanzelick, 648 S.W.2d 932, 934 (Tenn.1983) (abolishing discriminatory rule denying liability of wife for support of husband); Davis v. Davis, 657 S.W.2d 753, 758 (Tenn.1983) (abolishing interspousal tort immunity doctrine). | 2 | 2 |
Kilbourne v. Hanzelikgreen2 sentences1991Kilbourne v. Hanzelik, 648 S.W.2d 932, 934 (Tenn.1983) (abolishing discriminatory rule denying liability of wife for support of husband); Davis v. Davis, 657 S.W.2d 753, 758 (Tenn.1983) (abolishing interspousal tort immunity doctrine). 1991See also Kilboume v. Hanzelick, 648 S.W.2d 932, 934 (Tenn.1983) (abolishing discriminatory rule denying liability of wife for support of husband); Davis v. Davis, 657 S.W.2d 753, 758 (Tenn.1983) (abolishing interspousal tort immunity doctrine). | 2 | 2 |
Garrison v. Stampsgreen1 sentence2013Knierim v. Leatherwood, 542 S.W.2d 806, 808 (Tenn. 1976); Garrison v. Stamps, 109 S.W.3d 374, 377 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). | 1 | 1 |
Petty v. Daimler/Chrysler Corp.green1 sentence2013Courts apply the doctrine to determine whether a plaintiff is “‘properly situated to prosecute the action.’” Petty v. Daimler/Chrysler Corp., 91 S.W.3d 765, 767 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002)(quoting Knierim v. Leatherwood, 542 S.W.2d 806, 808 (Tenn.1976)). | 1 | 1 |
Bob Fannon, Individually and as a City Councilman for the City of LaFollette v. City of LaFollottegreen1 sentence2013Discussion Standing, a court-made doctrine, “is essential for a resolution on the merits of a legal controversy.” Fannon v. City of LaFollette, 329 S.W.3d 418, 424 (Tenn. 2010) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dupuis v. Hand
green
2 sentences2001We have also said that “we abdicate our function, in a field peculiarly non-statutory, when we refuse to consider an old and court-made rule.” Dupuis v. Hand, 814 S.W.2d at 345 . 1999Indeed, we have stated that “we abdicate our function, in a field peculiarly non-statutory, when we refuse to consider an old and court-made rule.” Id. | 2 | 1999–2001 |
Hanover v. Ruch
green
1 sentence1991Indeed, we have a special duty to do so where it is the Court, rather than the Legislature, which has recognized and nurtured the action. [W]e abdicate our own function, in a field peculiarly non-statutory, when we refuse to consider an old and court-made rule. 809 S.W.2d 893 (Tenn.1991). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.