7 Colorado opinions name it 1 courts 1971–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Argus Real Estate, Inc. v. E-470 Public Highway Authoritygreen1 sentence2013Highway Auth., 109 P.3d 604, 608 (Colo.2005). | 1 | 1 |
Pomeroy v. Waitkusgreen2 sentences2013As a court- made doctrine to ensure the finality of judgments, 18 Moore's Federal Practice § 181.10[1][a] (3d ed.2012), claim preclusion, or what formerly fell within the rubric of res judicata, see Pomeroy v. Waitkus, 183 Colo. 344, 349-50 , 517 P.2d 396, 399 (1973), is equally necessary, at least in some fashion and to some degree, to the process of attorney regulation. 110 In an effort to strike an appropriate balance between the systemic interest of finality and the competing but equally important interest of ensuring litigants a full and fair opportunity to seek redress for their injuries 2013As a court- made doctrine to ensure the finality of judgments, 18 Moore's Federal Practice § 181.10[1][a] (3d ed.2012), claim preclusion, or what formerly fell within the rubric of res judicata, see Pomeroy v. Waitkus, 183 Colo. 344, 349-50 , 517 P.2d 396, 399 (1973), is equally necessary, at least in some fashion and to some degree, to the process of attorney regulation. 110 In an effort to strike an appropriate balance between the systemic interest of finality and the competing but equally important interest of ensuring litigants a full and fair opportunity to seek redress for their injuries | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Evans v. Board of County Commissioners
green
2 sentences1971For the reasons expressed in Evans v. County Commissioners, 174 Colo. 97 , 482 P.2d 968 , announced contemporaneously with this opinion, we hold that the court-made doctrine of governmental immunity of school districts is overruled. 1971For the reasons expressed in Evans v. County Commissioners, 174 Colo. 97 , 482 P.2d 968 , announced contemporaneously with this opinion, we hold that the court-made doctrine of governmental immunity of school districts is overruled. | 5 | 1971–1971 |
Flournoy v. School District Number One
green
2 sentences1971No. 1, Colo., 482 P.2d 966 , that judgment was reversed on the holding that "* * * the court-made doctrine of governmental immunity of school districts is overruled." See also Evans v. County Comm'rs of County of El Paso, Colo., 482 P.2d 968 , which was announced contemporaneously with Flournoy v. School Dist. 1971No. 1, 174 Colo. 110 , 482 P.2d 966, that judgment was reversed on the holding that “. .. the court-made doctrine of governmental immunity of school districts is overruled.” See also Evans v. County Comm’rs. of County of El Paso, 174 Colo. 97 , 482 P.2d 968 , which was announced contemporaneously with Flournoy v. School Dist. | 3 | 1971–1971 |
Proffitt v. State
green
2 sentences1971As to the parties to this proceeding and the two contemporaneous proceedings (Evans, supra, and Proffitt v. State of Colorado, 174 Colo. 113 , 482 P.2d 965 ) this decision is effective immediately. 1971As to the parties to this proceeding and the two contemporaneous proceedings (Evans, supra, and Proffitt v. State of Colorado, 174 Colo. 113 , 482 P.2d 965 ) this decision is effective immediately. | 2 | 1971–1971 |
Thorpe v. City and County of Denver
green
2 sentences1983Thorpe v. Denver, 30 Colo.App. 284 , 494 P.2d 129 (1972) (applying rule of Aurora v. Woolman, 165 Colo. 377 , 439 P.2d 364 (1968)). 1983Thorpe v. Denver, 30 Colo.App. 284 , 494 P.2d 129 (1972) (applying rule of Aurora v. Woolman, 165 Colo. 377 , 439 P.2d 364 (1968)). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
City of Aurora v. Woolman
green
2 sentences1983Thorpe v. Denver, 30 Colo.App. 284 , 494 P.2d 129 (1972) (applying rule of Aurora v. Woolman, 165 Colo. 377 , 439 P.2d 364 (1968)). 1983Thorpe v. Denver, 30 Colo.App. 284 , 494 P.2d 129 (1972) (applying rule of Aurora v. Woolman, 165 Colo. 377 , 439 P.2d 364 (1968)). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.