8 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1915–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Armstrong v. Stategreen2 sentences1987Surely the same judge who has prescribed probation can determine whether a law has been violated and should be authorized to exercise the same discretion in determining whether a condition of the suspended sentence has been broken." Armstrong, supra, 55 Ala.App. at 46 , 312 So.2d at 616. 1987Surely the same judge who has prescribed probation can determine whether a law has been violated and should be authorized to exercise the same discretion in determining whether a condition of the suspended sentence has been broken." Armstrong , supra, 55 Ala. App. at 46 , 312 So.2d at 616 . | 1 | 1 |
Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Lavoiegreen2 sentences1986This is true, because no matter how badly the investigation of the claim was conducted, if, in fact, the insurer had knowledge of a debatable reason for denying the claim at the time it denied the claim, the insurer had a right and, arguably, a responsibility to challenge the claim. [1] Lavoie at 1083 (Torbert, C.J., dissenting). 1986This is true, because no matter how badly the investigation of the claim was conducted, if, in fact, the insurer had knowledge of a debatable reason for denying the claim at the time it denied the claim, the insurer had a right and, arguably, a responsibility to challenge the claim. 1 Lavoie at 1083 (Torbert, C.J., dissenting). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
National Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. Dutton
green
2 sentences2005We address Mrs. Jones's second issue first by noting that the investigation conducted by Farm Bureau after Kratzer's denial of the claim cannot serve as an arguable basis for denying the claim initially, because `whether an insurance company is justified in denying a claim under a policy must be judged by what was before it at the time the decision was made.' National Savings Life Insurance Co. v. Dutton , 419 So.2d 1357 , 1362 (Ala. 1982) (emphasis supplied)."). 1997"Whether an insurance company is justified in denying a claim under a policy must be judged by what was before it at the time the decision was made." Dutton , 419 So.2d at 1362 . | 2 | 1997–2005 |
Jones v. Alabama Farm Bureau Mut. Cas. Co.
green
1 sentence2005Co. , 507 So.2d 396 , 400 (Ala. 1986) ("Mrs. Jones also argues that Farm Bureau's `reinvestigation' was the only investigation of the claim and was conducted after the initial, actionable denial of the claim occurred. . . . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Boncouri v. Union Pacific R. Co.
green
1 sentence2000This case is similar to Boncouri v. Union Pacific Railroad Co., 981 F.Supp. 1271 (E.D.Mo.1997). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Daniels v. State
neutral
1 sentence1990We remanded this case to the trial court with instructions to inform appellant of his rights under the Youthful Offender Act and to hold a proper investigation and hearing. 567 So.2d 880 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Armstrong v. State
green
2 sentences1987Surely the same judge who has prescribed probation can determine whether a law has been violated and should be authorized to exercise the same discretion in determining whether a condition of the suspended sentence has been broken." Armstrong, supra, 55 Ala.App. at 46 , 312 So.2d at 616. 1987Surely the same judge who has prescribed probation can determine whether a law has been violated and should be authorized to exercise the same discretion in determining whether a condition of the suspended sentence has been broken." Armstrong , supra, 55 Ala. App. at 46 , 312 So.2d at 616 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Dixon v. State
green
2 sentences1974Fiorella v. State, supra; Dixon v. State, 42 Ala.App. 341 , 164 So.2d 509 . *616 Probation is a matter of grace given to the offender by the trial judge on the basis of an independent investigation and hearing. 1974Fiorella v. State, supra; Dixon v. State, 42 Ala.App. 341 , 164 So.2d 509 . *616 Probation is a matter of grace given to the offender by the trial judge on the basis of an independent investigation and hearing. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
United Order of Golden Cross v. Hooser
green
2 sentences1915As bearing on these matters, however, the following authorities are of interest, to-wit: United Order, etc., v. Hooser, 160 Ala. 334 , 49 South. 354 ; National Union v. Sherry, 180 Ala. 627 , 61 South. 944 ; Ætna Ins. 1915As bearing on these matters, however, the following authorities are of interest, to-wit: United Order, etc., v. Hooser, 160 Ala. 334 , 49 South. 354 ; National Union v. Sherry, 180 Ala. 627 , 61 South. 944 ; Ætna Ins. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
National Union v. Sherry
neutral
2 sentences1915As bearing on these matters, however, the following authorities are of interest, to-wit: United Order, etc., v. Hooser, 160 Ala. 334 , 49 South. 354 ; National Union v. Sherry, 180 Ala. 627 , 61 South. 944 ; Ætna Ins. 1915As bearing on these matters, however, the following authorities are of interest, to-wit: United Order, etc., v. Hooser, 160 Ala. 334 , 49 South. 354 ; National Union v. Sherry, 180 Ala. 627 , 61 South. 944 ; Ætna Ins. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.