investigation inquiry in Indiana

2012The Court also highlighted the statutory requirement that “the juvenile court may not waive jurisdiction until ‘after full investigation and hearing,’ ” and noted: Summers instructs that the record “should be sufficient to demonstrate unequivocally that the strict statutory requirement of a full investigation and hearing has been met and that a conscientious determination of the question of waiver has been made.” 248 Ind. at 559-60 , 280 N.E.2d at 325.

1994Summers instructs that the record “should be sufficient to demonstrate unequivocally that the strict statutory requirement of a full investigation and hearing has been met and that a conscientious determination of the question of waiver has been made.” 248 Ind. at 559-60 , 230 N.E.2d at 325 .

1981If the books, records, tax returns and related data are not made available, a subpoena or a subpoena duces tecum will be issued to obtain this information unless in the judgment of the State Board other action would be more appropriate.” In Satterwhite v. State (1895), 142 Ind. 1 , 40 N.E. 654 , after listing the powers and the duties of the Board under the then current law — substantially equivalent to the present law — the Court stated: “Finally, as held in State v. Wood, 110 Ind. 82 , 10 N.E. 639 , to aid the board in the discharge of all these duties, it is further provided that they ‘may

1981If the books, records, tax returns and related data are not made available, a subpoena or a subpoena duces tecum will be issued to obtain this information unless in the judgment of the State Board other action would be more appropriate.” In Satterwhite v. State (1895), 142 Ind. 1 , 40 N.E. 654 , after listing the powers and the duties of the Board under the then current law — substantially equivalent to the present law — the Court stated: “Finally, as held in State v. Wood, 110 Ind. 82 , 10 N.E. 639 , to aid the board in the discharge of all these duties, it is further provided that they ‘may

2017It is declarant’s belief, based on the above facts, and your declarant’s training and experience, that the use of the thermal imager at 70450 Chadwick, Jolon Road, Lockwood in the County of Monterey, will assist in the investigation of the violation of Section 11358 of the Health and Safety Code, Cultivation of Marijuana. 131 Cal. Rptr. 2d at 841-43 . [25] Reversing, the court quoted People v. Johnson, 220 Cal. App. 3d 742, 749 (1990), discussing what level of corroboration was sufficient for reliance on information provided by an untested, anonymous, or unreliable informant.

2017It is declarant’s belief, based on the above facts, and your declarant’s training and experience, that the use of the thermal imager at 70450 Chadwick, Jo- Ion Road, Lockwood in" the County of Monterey, will assist in the investigation of the violation of Section 11358 of the Health and Safety Code, Cultivation of Marijuana. 131 Cal.Rptr.2d at 841-43 .

2009In Miller v. Dilts, 463 N.E.2d 257 (Ind.1984), this Court distinguished insurance policy provisions requiring an insured to give notice to the insurer from provisions requiring the insured to cooperate *1272 with the insurer's investigation and defense of a claim, holding that an insurer "must show actual prejudice from an insured's noncompliance with the policy's cooperation clause before it can avoid liability under the policy." Id. at 261 .

2009In Miller v. Dilts, 463 N.E.2d 257 (Ind.1984), this Court distinguished insurance policy provisions requiring an insured to give notice to the insurer from provisions requiring the insured to cooperate *1272 with the insurer's investigation and defense of a claim, holding that an insurer "must show actual prejudice from an insured's noncompliance with the policy's cooperation clause before it can avoid liability under the policy." Id. at 261 .

1994We acknowledge, as the State points out, that denials of motions for continuance not based on statutory grounds are committed to the sound discretion of the trial court, Gordon v. State (1993), Ind., 609 N.E.2d 1085, 1088 , and that continuances allowing for preparation are not favored.

1982Judge Ratliff stated: “Second, even assuming the investigation of the claim was below industry standards, negligence cannot be the basis for awarding punitive damages.” 434 N.E.2d at 596 .

1982Judge Ratliff stated: "Second, even assuming the investigation of the claim was below industry standards, negligence cannot be the basis for awarding punitive damages." 434 N.E.2d at 596 .

1982Prudential Insurance Co. v. Executive Estates, (1977) Ind.App., 369 N.E.2d 1117 , trans. denied.

1981If the books, records, tax returns and related data are not made available, a subpoena or a subpoena duces tecum will be issued to obtain this information unless in the judgment of the State Board other action would be more appropriate.” In Satterwhite v. State (1895), 142 Ind. 1 , 40 N.E. 654 , after listing the powers and the duties of the Board under the then current law — substantially equivalent to the present law — the Court stated: “Finally, as held in State v. Wood, 110 Ind. 82 , 10 N.E. 639 , to aid the board in the discharge of all these duties, it is further provided that they ‘may

1981And the power to make such investigation includes the power to get information from the supposed owner and other witnesses.” 142 Ind. at 6-7 , 40 N.E. at 656.

1980We are further cognizant of Harris v. State, (1980) Ind.App., 398 N.E.2d 1346 , which held that any error in failing to have a preliminary investigation hearing was waived unless first raised at the time of the alleged error.

1979Our Supreme Court responded to a double jeopardy challenge in Walker v. State (1976), Ind., 349 N.E.2d 161, at 166 , cert. den., 429 U.S. 943 , 97 S.Ct. 363 , 50 L.Ed.2d 313 , by stating that the investigation required under our waiver statute was not an adjudication of delinquency as contemplated by Breed v. Jones, supra, but was merely determinative of the forum, and that there is no finding that certain acts have or have not been committed in fact.

1979Our Supreme Court responded to a double jeopardy challenge in Walker v. State (1976), Ind., 349 N.E.2d 161, at 166 , cert. den., 429 U.S. 943 , 97 S.Ct. 363 , 50 L.Ed.2d 313 , by stating that the investigation required under our waiver statute was not an adjudication of delinquency as contemplated by Breed v. Jones, supra , but was merely determinative of the forum, and that there is no finding that certain acts have or have not been committed in fact.

1979Our Supreme Court responded to a double jeopardy challenge in Walker v. State (1976), Ind., 349 N.E.2d 161, at 166 , cert. den., 429 U.S. 943 , 97 S.Ct. 363 , 50 L.Ed.2d 313 , by stating that the investigation required under our waiver statute was not an adjudication of delinquency as contemplated by Breed v. Jones, supra, but was merely determinative of the forum, and that there is no finding that certain acts have or have not been committed in fact.

1979Our Supreme Court responded to a double jeopardy challenge in Walker v. State (1976), Ind., 349 N.E.2d 161, at 166 , cert. den., 429 U.S. 943 , 97 S.Ct. 363 , 50 L.Ed.2d 313 , by stating that the investigation required under our waiver statute was not an adjudication of delinquency as contemplated by Breed v. Jones, supra , but was merely determinative of the forum, and that there is no finding that certain acts have or have not been committed in fact.

1979Our Supreme Court responded to a double jeopardy challenge in Walker v. State (1976), Ind., 349 N.E.2d 161, at 166 , cert. den., 429 U.S. 943 , 97 S.Ct. 363 , 50 L.Ed.2d 313 , by stating that the investigation required under our waiver statute was not an adjudication of delinquency as contemplated by Breed v. Jones, supra, but was merely determinative of the forum, and that there is no finding that certain acts have or have not been committed in fact.

1979Our Supreme Court responded to a double jeopardy challenge in Walker v. State (1976), Ind., 349 N.E.2d 161, at 166 , cert. den., 429 U.S. 943 , 97 S.Ct. 363 , 50 L.Ed.2d 313 , by stating that the investigation required under our waiver statute was not an adjudication of delinquency as contemplated by Breed v. Jones, supra , but was merely determinative of the forum, and that there is no finding that certain acts have or have not been committed in fact.

1979See also: Seay v. State (1976), Ind.App., 340 N.E.2d 369 (on rehearing).

1979See also: Seay v. State (1976), Ind. App., 340 N.E.2d 369 (on rehearing).

1974Daniels contends that he has carried such burden and relies upon Thomas v. State (1969), 251 Ind. 546 , 242 N.E.2d 919 , 924 as follows: “ * * * we hold only that he (the public defender) must conduct a proper investigation of the defense as a basis on which to predicate his decision.

1974Daniels contends that he has carried such burden and relies upon Thomas v. State (1969), 251 Ind. 546 , 242 N.E.2d 919 , 924 as follows: “ * * * we hold only that he (the public defender) must conduct a proper investigation of the defense as a basis on which to predicate his decision.

1917Judgment reversed and cause remanded, with instructions to grant a new trial, and for such other proceedings as are not inconsistent with this opinion.' Note. — Reported in 117 N. E. 975 .

1899Speed v. Hollingsworth, 54 Kan. 436 , 38 Pac. 496 ; Hoock v. Bowman, 42 Neb. 80 , 60 N. W. 389 ; Dodge v. Pope, 93 Ind. 480 ; West v. Wright, 98 Ind. 335 ; Ledbetter v. Davis, 121 Ind. 119 .

1899Speed v. Hollingsworth, 54 Kan. 436 , 38 Pac. 496 ; Hoock v. Bowman, 42 Neb. 80 , 60 N. W. 389 ; Dodge v. Pope, 93 Ind. 480 ; West v. Wright, 98 Ind. 335 ; Ledbetter v. Davis, 121 Ind. 119 .

1899Speed v. Hollingsworth, 54 Kan. 436 , 38 Pac. 496 ; Hoock v. Bowman, 42 Neb. 80 , 60 N. W. 389 ; Dodge v. Pope, 93 Ind. 480 ; West v. Wright, 98 Ind. 335 ; Ledbetter v. Davis, 121 Ind. 119 .

1899Speed v. Hollingsworth, 54 Kan. 436 , 38 Pac. 496 ; Hoock v. Bowman, 42 Neb. 80 , 60 N. W. 389 ; Dodge v. Pope, 93 Ind. 480 ; West v. Wright, 98 Ind. 335 ; Ledbetter v. Davis, 121 Ind. 119 .

1899Speed v. Hollingsworth, 54 Kan. 436 , 38 Pac. 496 ; Hoock v. Bowman, 42 Neb. 80 , 60 N. W. 389 ; Dodge v. Pope, 93 Ind. 480 ; West v. Wright, 98 Ind. 335 ; Ledbetter v. Davis, 121 Ind. 119 .

1899Speed v. Hollingsworth, 54 Kan. 436 , 38 Pac. 496 ; Hoock v. Bowman, 42 Neb. 80 , 60 N. W. 389 ; Dodge v. Pope, 93 Ind. 480 ; West v. Wright, 98 Ind. 335 ; Ledbetter v. Davis, 121 Ind. 119 .