Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1972–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Felipe Salinasgreen1 sentence2026See United States v. Salinas, 543 F. App’x 458, 467 (5th Cir. 2013) (the independent investigation requirement “may be superfluous”); United States v. Baez, 983 F.3d 18 1029, 1039 (8th Cir. 2020) (recognizing that its application of the requirement has been inconsistent). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Daniel Jensen
green
2 sentences2021Id. at 248–49, 385 P.3d at 10–11. 2021Id. at 248–49, 385 P.3d at 10–11. | 2 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Gibbs
green
2 sentences1972He also argues that it would be illogical to give the prosecutor unfettered discretion to decide whether to treat a child as a juvenile rather than as an adult when State v. Gibbs, 94 Idaho 908 , 500 P. 2d 209 (1972), makes the decision on that issue subject to a full investigation and hearing, and further subject to the definite criteria set out in the Gibbs opinion. 1972He also argues that it would be illogical to give the prosecutor unfettered discretion to decide whether to treat a child as a juvenile rather than as an adult when State v. Gibbs, 94 Idaho 908 , 500 P. 2d 209 (1972), makes the decision on that issue subject to a full investigation and hearing, and further subject to the definite criteria set out in the Gibbs opinion. | 2 | 1972–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.