Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pine Bluff School District v. Ace American Insurance Companygreen1 sentence2021See J- McDaniel Const. Co., 761 F.3d at 919 ; Peoples Protective Life Ins. [v. Smith, 257 Ark. 76, 86 , 514 S.W.2d 400 , 406–07 (1974)]. 8 Pine Bluff, 984 F.3d at 595 (alteration in original). | 1 | 1 |
J-McDaniel Construction Co v. Mid-Continent Casualty Companygreen1 sentence2021See J- McDaniel Const. Co., 761 F.3d at 919 ; Peoples Protective Life Ins. [v. Smith, 257 Ark. 76, 86 , 514 S.W.2d 400 , 406–07 (1974)]. 8 Pine Bluff, 984 F.3d at 595 (alteration in original). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
LIFE & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO. OF TENN. v. Nicholson
neutral
2 sentences1974In Life & Casualty Insurance Company of Tenn. v. Nicholson, 246 Ark. 570 , 439 S.W. 2d 648 , we said: It is well settled in this state that the doctrines of waiver and estoppel, based upon the conduct or action of the insurer, cannot be used to extend the coverage of an insurance policy to a risk not covered by its terms or expressly excluded therefrom. 1974In Life & Casualty Insurance Company of Tenn. v. Nicholson, 246 Ark. 570 , 439 S.W. 2d 648 , we said: It is well settled in this state that the doctrines of waiver and estoppel, based upon the conduct or action of the insurer, cannot be used to extend the coverage of an insurance policy to a risk not covered by its terms or expressly excluded therefrom. | 3 | 1970–1981 |
Peoples Protective Life Insurance Co. v. Smith
green
2 sentences1984It is well settled in this state that the doctrines of waiver and estoppel, based upon the conduct or action of the insurer, cannot be used to extend the coverage of an insurance policy to a risk not covered by its terms or expressly excluded therefrom.” The most recent case in which this doctrine was applied is Peoples Protective Life Ins. v. Smith, 257 Ark. 76 , 514 S.W.2d 400 (1974). 1984It is well settled in this state that the doctrines of waiver and estoppel, based upon the conduct or action of the insurer, cannot be used to extend the coverage of an insurance policy to a risk not covered by its terms or expressly excluded therefrom.” The most recent case in which this doctrine was applied is Peoples Protective Life Ins. v. Smith, 257 Ark. 76 , 514 S.W.2d 400 (1974). | 2 | 1984–2021 |
Batesville Insurance & Finance Company v. Butler
green
2 sentences1974Later, in Batesville Insurance & Finance Company v. Butler, 248 Ark. 776 , 453 S.W. 2d 709 , we made these appropriate remarks: Butler’s second point on cross-appeal is that U.S.F. & G. should be estopped from denying the coverage in question because of the representations of its agent, the Batesville Insurance & Finance Co., Inc. In making this argument, Butler has shown us no reason to overrule our many decisions holding that the doctrines of waiver and estoppel, based upon conduct or action of an insurer, cannot be used to extend coverage of an insurance policy to a risk not covered by its 1974Later, in Batesville Insurance & Finance Company v. Butler, 248 Ark. 776 , 453 S.W. 2d 709 , we made these appropriate remarks: Butler’s second point on cross-appeal is that U.S.F. & G. should be estopped from denying the coverage in question because of the representations of its agent, the Batesville Insurance & Finance Co., Inc. In making this argument, Butler has shown us no reason to overrule our many decisions holding that the doctrines of waiver and estoppel, based upon conduct or action of an insurer, cannot be used to extend coverage of an insurance policy to a risk not covered by its | 2 | 1974–1981 |
Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Stagg
green
2 sentences1974Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Smith, 200 Ark. 508 , 139 S.W. 2d 411 ; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Stagg. 215 Ark. 456 , 221 S.W. 2d 29 ; Bankers National Insurance Co. v.Hemby, 217 Ark. 749 , 233 S.W. 2d 637 . 1974Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Smith, 200 Ark. 508 , 139 S.W. 2d 411 ; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Stagg. 215 Ark. 456 , 221 S.W. 2d 29 ; Bankers National Insurance Co. v.Hemby, 217 Ark. 749 , 233 S.W. 2d 637 . | 2 | 1969–1974 |
Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Smith
green
2 sentences1974Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Smith, 200 Ark. 508 , 139 S.W. 2d 411 ; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Stagg. 215 Ark. 456 , 221 S.W. 2d 29 ; Bankers National Insurance Co. v.Hemby, 217 Ark. 749 , 233 S.W. 2d 637 . 1974Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Smith, 200 Ark. 508 , 139 S.W. 2d 411 ; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Stagg. 215 Ark. 456 , 221 S.W. 2d 29 ; Bankers National Insurance Co. v.Hemby, 217 Ark. 749 , 233 S.W. 2d 637 . | 2 | 1969–1974 |
Ark. State Highway Comm. v. Hightower
green
2 sentences2012Instead, citing Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Hightower, 238 Ark. 569 , 383 S.W.2d 279 (1964), the court found that the doctrines of waiver and estoppel prohibited 40 Retail from challenging the ordinance because it sought and was granted a hardship license |sand because it had received the benefit of the ordinance’s amortization period. 2012Instead, citing Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Hightower, 238 Ark. 569 , 383 S.W.2d 279 (1964), the court found that the doctrines of waiver and estoppel prohibited 40 Retail from challenging the ordinance because it sought and was granted a hardship license |sand because it had received the benefit of the ordinance’s amortization period. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Brown v. Cudis Insurance Society, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences1991Society, Inc., 11 Ark. 1991Society, Inc., 11 Ark. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Bankers National Insurance v. Hemby
green
2 sentences1974Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Smith, 200 Ark. 508 , 139 S.W. 2d 411 ; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Stagg. 215 Ark. 456 , 221 S.W. 2d 29 ; Bankers National Insurance Co. v.Hemby, 217 Ark. 749 , 233 S.W. 2d 637 . 1974Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. Smith, 200 Ark. 508 , 139 S.W. 2d 411 ; Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Stagg. 215 Ark. 456 , 221 S.W. 2d 29 ; Bankers National Insurance Co. v.Hemby, 217 Ark. 749 , 233 S.W. 2d 637 . | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.