Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1993–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ingram v. Ingramgreen2 sentences2003Cf. Ingram v. Ingram, 1991 OK CIV APP 62, ¶ 7 , 814 P.2d 1052, 1054 (because the trial court has continuing jurisdiction *80 over matters of child custody and visitation and best interests of minor children are not "fixed and immutable," second application for grandparental visitation was not barred). ¶ 7 Courts in other jurisdictions also have declined to apply the doctrines of claim and issue preclusion in termination of parental rights proceedings. 2003Cf. Ingram v. Ingram, 1991 OK CIV APP 62, ¶ 7 , 814 P.2d 1052, 1054 (because the trial court has continuing jurisdiction *80 over matters of child custody and visitation and best interests of minor children are not "fixed and immutable," second application for grandparental visitation was not barred). ¶ 7 Courts in other jurisdictions also have declined to apply the doctrines of claim and issue preclusion in termination of parental rights proceedings. | 2 | 2 |
Mann v. Stategreen1 sentence1994Mann v. State, 856 P.2d 992, 994 (Okl.Cr.1993); Banks v. State, 810 P.2d 1286 (Okl.Cr.1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Angela W.
green
2 sentences2003In In re Marcus W., 11 Neb.App. 313 , 649 N.W.2d 899 (2002), the state sought to terminate a mother's parental rights because she had failed to protect her children and to make sufficient progress despite intervention. 2003In In re Marcus W., 11 Neb.App. 313 , 649 N.W.2d 899 (2002), the state sought to terminate a mother's parental rights because she had failed to protect her children and to make sufficient progress despite intervention. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Banks v. State
green
2 sentences1994Mann v. State, 856 P.2d 992, 994 (Okl.Cr.1993); Banks v. State, 810 P.2d 1286 (Okl.Cr.1991). 1993Banks v. State, 810 P.2d 1286 (Okl.Cr.1991). | 2 | 1993–1994 |
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R. Co. v. State
green
2 sentences2018We disagree. ¶11 The Commission may exercise legislative, judicial, or executive power. 19 When it exercises judicial power, the Commission is functionally a court of record, and judicial doctrines such as res judicata are applicable. 20 When it exercises legislative power, however, res judicata is not applicable. 21 Findings of fact or rules of law stated in a legislative proceeding have no preclusive effect. 22 For example, in Chicago , R.I . &P.R.Co . v. State , 1950 OK 297 , ¶ 1, 203 Okla. 659 , 225 P.2d 363 , the Commission issued a final order denying an application that sought to establ 2018We disagree. ¶11 The Commission may exercise legislative, judicial, or executive power. 19 When it exercises judicial power, the Commission is functionally a court of record, and judicial doctrines such as res judicata are applicable. 20 When it exercises legislative power, however, res judicata is not applicable. 21 Findings of fact or rules of law stated in a legislative proceeding have no preclusive effect. 22 For example, in Chicago , R.I . &P.R.Co . v. State , 1950 OK 297 , ¶ 1, 203 Okla. 659 , 225 P.2d 363 , the Commission issued a final order denying an application that sought to establ | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Metallo v. Musengo
green
1 sentence2000Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Castro v. State
green
2 sentences1995Castro, 880 P.2d at 388 . 1995Castro, 880 P.2d at 388 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.