Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1934–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Weaver v. City of Everettgreen1 sentence2026App. 2d 520 , 525-26, 417 P.3d 650 (2018) (holding claim preclusion prevented a later request for will interpretation after the estate was closed); Garza v. Baley, No. 86854-3-I, slip op. at 9 (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 19, 2024) (unpublished), https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/868543.pdf (holding claim preclusion barred subsequent TEDRA petition since it asserted claims that either were, should, or might have been litigated in the probate of the estate). 9 Thus, even if TEDRA 8 This argument conflates the separate doctrines of claim and issue preclusion, as only issue preclusion specifically r | 1 | 1 |
Saunders v. Lloyd's of Londongreen2 sentences2020See Br. of Resp’t at 31 (citing Saunders v. Lloyd’s of London, 113 Wn.2d 330, 339-40 , 779 P.2d 249 (1989) (holding that the doctrines of waiver and estoppel have a different focus and must be separately analyzed) and Specialty Surplus Ins. 2020See Br. of Resp’t at 31 (citing Saunders v. Lloyd’s of London, 113 Wn.2d 330, 339-40 , 779 P.2d 249 (1989) (holding that the doctrines of waiver and estoppel have a different focus and must be separately analyzed) and Specialty Surplus Ins. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kuhlman v. Thomas
green
2 sentences2024Id. at 119 . 2023Id. at 119 . | 2 | 2023–2024 |
State v. Brand
green
2 sentences2001Although decided in a different context, we have previously addressed this issue in Brand, 120 Wash.2d 365 , 842 P.2d 470 . 2001Although decided in a different context, we have previously addressed this issue in Brand, 120 Wn.2d 365 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Gabriel E. Gourde & Charbonneau D. Gourde v. Ann L. Gannam
neutral
1 sentence2026App. 2d 520 , 525-26, 417 P.3d 650 (2018) (holding claim preclusion prevented a later request for will interpretation after the estate was closed); Garza v. Baley, No. 86854-3-I, slip op. at 9 (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 19, 2024) (unpublished), https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/868543.pdf (holding claim preclusion barred subsequent TEDRA petition since it asserted claims that either were, should, or might have been litigated in the probate of the estate). 9 Thus, even if TEDRA 8 This argument conflates the separate doctrines of claim and issue preclusion, as only issue preclusion specifically r | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Martin v. Wilbert
green
1 sentence2026App. 2d 520 , 525-26, 417 P.3d 650 (2018) (holding claim preclusion prevented a later request for will interpretation after the estate was closed); Garza v. Baley, No. 86854-3-I, slip op. at 9 (Wash. Ct. App. Nov. 19, 2024) (unpublished), https://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/868543.pdf (holding claim preclusion barred subsequent TEDRA petition since it asserted claims that either were, should, or might have been litigated in the probate of the estate). 9 Thus, even if TEDRA 8 This argument conflates the separate doctrines of claim and issue preclusion, as only issue preclusion specifically r | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Ullery v. FULLETON
green
2 sentences2021Claim preclusion “prevent[s] a second assertion of the same claim or cause of action,” and issue preclusion “bars relitigation of an issue in a subsequent proceeding involving the same parties.” Ullery v. Fulleton, 162 Wn. App. 596, 602 , 256 P.3d 406 (2011). 2021Claim preclusion “prevent[s] a second assertion of the same claim or cause of action,” and issue preclusion “bars relitigation of an issue in a subsequent proceeding involving the same parties.” Ullery v. Fulleton, 162 Wn. App. 596, 602 , 256 P.3d 406 (2011). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Specialty Surplus Insurance v. Second Chance, Inc.
green
1 sentence2020Co. v. Second Chance, Inc., 412 F. Supp. 2d 1152 (W.D. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co.
green
2 sentences1934We might well conclude our own discussion of this branch of the case by saying that, despite the conflicting rule with respect to the extent and effect of a presumption of law, as laid down in Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co., 63 Wash. 18 , 114 Pac. 870 , Nicholson v. Neary, 77 Wash. 294 , 137 Pac. 492 , Welch v. Creech, 88 Wash. 429 , 153 Pac. 355 , L. 1934We might well conclude our own discussion of this branch of the case by saying that, despite the conflicting rule with respect to the extent and effect of a presumption of law, as laid down in Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co., 63 Wash. 18 , 114 Pac. 870 , Nicholson v. Neary, 77 Wash. 294 , 137 Pac. 492 , Welch v. Creech, 88 Wash. 429 , 153 Pac. 355 , L. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Welch v. Creech
green
2 sentences1934We might well conclude our own discussion of this branch of the case by saying that, despite the conflicting rule with respect to the extent and effect of a presumption of law, as laid down in Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co., 63 Wash. 18 , 114 Pac. 870 , Nicholson v. Neary, 77 Wash. 294 , 137 Pac. 492 , Welch v. Creech, 88 Wash. 429 , 153 Pac. 355 , L. 1934We might well conclude our own discussion of this branch of the case by saying that, despite the conflicting rule with respect to the extent and effect of a presumption of law, as laid down in Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co., 63 Wash. 18 , 114 Pac. 870 , Nicholson v. Neary, 77 Wash. 294 , 137 Pac. 492 , Welch v. Creech, 88 Wash. 429 , 153 Pac. 355 , L. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Nicholson v. Neary
neutral
2 sentences1934We might well conclude our own discussion of this branch of the case by saying that, despite the conflicting rule with respect to the extent and effect of a presumption of law, as laid down in Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co., 63 Wash. 18 , 114 Pac. 870 , Nicholson v. Neary, 77 Wash. 294 , 137 Pac. 492 , Welch v. Creech, 88 Wash. 429 , 153 Pac. 355 , L. 1934We might well conclude our own discussion of this branch of the case by saying that, despite the conflicting rule with respect to the extent and effect of a presumption of law, as laid down in Scarpelli v. Washington Water Power Co., 63 Wash. 18 , 114 Pac. 870 , Nicholson v. Neary, 77 Wash. 294 , 137 Pac. 492 , Welch v. Creech, 88 Wash. 429 , 153 Pac. 355 , L. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.