national standard (Colorado) · Go Syfert
← Colorado issues

national standard in Colorado

8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1944–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Stauffer v. Karabingreen
coloctapp · 1971 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
2 sentences

1992See Mallett v. Pirkey, 171 Colo. 271, 282 , 466 P.2d 466, 471 (1970); Martin, 36 Colo.App. at 258-59 , 540 P.2d at 1120 ; Stauffer v. Karabin, 30 Colo.App. 357, 364 , 492 P.2d 862, 865 (1971).

1992See Mallett v. Pirkey, 171 Colo. 271, 282 , 466 P.2d 466, 471 (1970); Martin, 36 Colo.App. at 258-59 , 540 P.2d at 1120 ; Stauffer v. Karabin, 30 Colo.App. 357, 364 , 492 P.2d 862, 865 (1971).

11
Mallett v. Pirkeygreen
colo · 1970 · cited in 1 Colorado opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
2 sentences

1992See Mallett v. Pirkey, 171 Colo. 271, 282 , 466 P.2d 466, 471 (1970); Martin, 36 Colo.App. at 258-59 , 540 P.2d at 1120 ; Stauffer v. Karabin, 30 Colo.App. 357, 364 , 492 P.2d 862, 865 (1971).

1992See Mallett v. Pirkey, 171 Colo. 271, 282 , 466 P.2d 466, 471 (1970); Martin, 36 Colo.App. at 258-59 , 540 P.2d at 1120 ; Stauffer v. Karabin, 30 Colo.App. 357, 364 , 492 P.2d 862, 865 (1971).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Wallbank v. Rothenberg green
coloctapp · 2003
2 sentences

2008Id.; Wallbank, 74 P.3d at 416 ; see CJI-Civ. 4th 15:3 (2001).

2008Id.; Wallbank, 74 P.3d at 416 ; see CJI-Civ. 4th 15:3 (2001).

22008–2008
McCarty v. McCarty red
scotus · 1981
2 sentences

1995McCarty v. McCarty, supra, 453 U.S. at 235 , 101 S.Ct. at 2742 , 69 L.Ed.2d at 607 .

1995McCarty v. McCarty, supra, 453 U.S. at 235 , 101 S.Ct. at 2742 , 69 L.Ed.2d at 607 .

11995–1995
Martin v. Bralliar green
coloctapp · 1975
2 sentences

1992See Mallett v. Pirkey, 171 Colo. 271, 282 , 466 P.2d 466, 471 (1970); Martin, 36 Colo.App. at 258-59 , 540 P.2d at 1120 ; Stauffer v. Karabin, 30 Colo.App. 357, 364 , 492 P.2d 862, 865 (1971).

1992See Mallett v. Pirkey, 171 Colo. 271, 282 , 466 P.2d 466, 471 (1970); Martin, 36 Colo.App. at 258-59 , 540 P.2d at 1120 ; Stauffer v. Karabin, 30 Colo.App. 357, 364 , 492 P.2d 862, 865 (1971).

11992–1992
National Advertising Co. v. Department of Highways green
colo · 1986
1 sentence

1988We considered a similar claim in National Advertising Company v. Department of Highways, 718 P.2d 1038 (Colo.1986), in which National argued that the state should be estopped from requiring National to secure a sign permit under the Outdoor Advertising Act due to the fact that Arapahoe County had already issued National a permit for the construction of a billboard in an area along a state highway encompassed by the provisions of the Outdoor Advertising Act.

11988–1988
Miller v. California green
scotus · 1973
2 sentences

1976Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 , 93 S.Ct. 2607 , 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973).

1976Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 , 93 S.Ct. 2607 , 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973).

11976–1976
Collins v. Meeker green
kan · 1967
2 sentences

1971Mallett v. Pirkey, supra ; Foose v. Haymond, 135 Colo. 275 , 310 P.2d 722 ; Colorado Jury Instructions 15:1, 15:11, supra; Comment, Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice, 55 Cal.L.Rev. 1396; Collins v. Meeker, 198 Kan. 390 , 424 P.2d 488 .

1971Mallett v. Pirkey, supra ; Foose v. Haymond, 135 Colo. 275 , 310 P.2d 722 ; Colorado Jury Instructions 15:1, 15:11, supra; Comment, Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice, 55 Cal.L.Rev. 1396; Collins v. Meeker, 198 Kan. 390 , 424 P.2d 488 .

11971–1971
Foose v. Haymond green
colo · 1957
2 sentences

1971Mallett v. Pirkey, supra ; Foose v. Haymond, 135 Colo. 275 , 310 P.2d 722 ; Colorado Jury Instructions 15:1, 15:11, supra; Comment, Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice, 55 Cal.L.Rev. 1396; Collins v. Meeker, 198 Kan. 390 , 424 P.2d 488 .

1971Mallett v. Pirkey, supra ; Foose v. Haymond, 135 Colo. 275 , 310 P.2d 722 ; Colorado Jury Instructions 15:1, 15:11, supra; Comment, Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice, 55 Cal.L.Rev. 1396; Collins v. Meeker, 198 Kan. 390 , 424 P.2d 488 .

11971–1971
City of Cedartown v. Pickett green
ga · 1942
2 sentences

1944The court held that the act by its very terms was applicable to the United States and to the several states and territories and cited and quoted from the opinion in Bowsman v. Peterson, 45 F. Supp. 741 , in which the court states: “The Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act * * * was prompted by at least two considerations, first, the maintenance in the armed forces of a reasonable measure of that unbothered serenity and security in respect of personal responsibilities *16 which effectively promotes military efficiency and the national defense; and secondly, the assurance that in the field of i

1944The court held that the act by its very terms was applicable to the United States and to the several states and territories and cited and quoted from the opinion in Bowsman v. Peterson, 45 F. Supp. 741 , in which the court states: “The Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act * * * was prompted by at least two considerations, first, the maintenance in the armed forces of a reasonable measure of that unbothered serenity and security in respect of personal responsibilities *16 which effectively promotes military efficiency and the national defense; and secondly, the assurance that in the field of i

11944–1944
Bowsman v. Peterson green
ned · 1942
1 sentence

1944The court held that the act by its very terms was applicable to the United States and to the several states and territories and cited and quoted from the opinion in Bowsman v. Peterson, 45 F. Supp. 741 , in which the court states: “The Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act * * * was prompted by at least two considerations, first, the maintenance in the armed forces of a reasonable measure of that unbothered serenity and security in respect of personal responsibilities *16 which effectively promotes military efficiency and the national defense; and secondly, the assurance that in the field of i

11944–1944

Where else courts name it

DC 42 (1967–2023) TN 41 (1967–2022) CA 27 (1941–2022) NC 27 (1948–2026) ID 26 (1987–2025) TX 23 (1972–2023) IL 23 (1943–2017) NY 22 (1904–2025) LA 21 (1943–2026) MI 20 (1972–2024) MS 18 (1986–2026) CT 18 (1965–2016) AL 17 (1970–2026) WA 17 (1967–2025) PA 17 (1938–2024) RI 12 (1970–2015) MT 11 (1981–2024) FL 10 (1941–2017) NJ 8 (1964–2019) UT 8 (1938–2024) GA 8 (1947–2009) CO 8 (1944–2008) MO 8 (1965–2022) AR 7 (1943–2026) AZ 7 (1968–2025) MA 7 (1980–2023) OH 6 (1971–2022) OR 6 (1966–2024) HI 5 (1991–2024) MD 5 (1960–2013) OK 5 (1946–2026) VA 5 (1974–2004) NM 4 (1970–2025) WV 4 (1982–2020) KS 4 (1966–2013) IN 4 (1971–2002) NE 4 (1980–2024) WI 3 (1963–1994) SD 3 (1989–2014) MN 3 (1977–2017) DE 3 (1992–1999) NV 2 (1988–1989) AK 2 (1978–1991) WY 2 (2002–2003) SC 2 (1984–1993)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check