8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1944–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Stauffer v. Karabingreen2 sentences1992See Mallett v. Pirkey, 171 Colo. 271, 282 , 466 P.2d 466, 471 (1970); Martin, 36 Colo.App. at 258-59 , 540 P.2d at 1120 ; Stauffer v. Karabin, 30 Colo.App. 357, 364 , 492 P.2d 862, 865 (1971). 1992See Mallett v. Pirkey, 171 Colo. 271, 282 , 466 P.2d 466, 471 (1970); Martin, 36 Colo.App. at 258-59 , 540 P.2d at 1120 ; Stauffer v. Karabin, 30 Colo.App. 357, 364 , 492 P.2d 862, 865 (1971). | 1 | 1 |
Mallett v. Pirkeygreen2 sentences1992See Mallett v. Pirkey, 171 Colo. 271, 282 , 466 P.2d 466, 471 (1970); Martin, 36 Colo.App. at 258-59 , 540 P.2d at 1120 ; Stauffer v. Karabin, 30 Colo.App. 357, 364 , 492 P.2d 862, 865 (1971). 1992See Mallett v. Pirkey, 171 Colo. 271, 282 , 466 P.2d 466, 471 (1970); Martin, 36 Colo.App. at 258-59 , 540 P.2d at 1120 ; Stauffer v. Karabin, 30 Colo.App. 357, 364 , 492 P.2d 862, 865 (1971). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wallbank v. Rothenberg
green
2 sentences2008Id.; Wallbank, 74 P.3d at 416 ; see CJI-Civ. 4th 15:3 (2001). 2008Id.; Wallbank, 74 P.3d at 416 ; see CJI-Civ. 4th 15:3 (2001). | 2 | 2008–2008 |
McCarty v. McCarty
red
2 sentences1995McCarty v. McCarty, supra, 453 U.S. at 235 , 101 S.Ct. at 2742 , 69 L.Ed.2d at 607 . 1995McCarty v. McCarty, supra, 453 U.S. at 235 , 101 S.Ct. at 2742 , 69 L.Ed.2d at 607 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Martin v. Bralliar
green
2 sentences1992See Mallett v. Pirkey, 171 Colo. 271, 282 , 466 P.2d 466, 471 (1970); Martin, 36 Colo.App. at 258-59 , 540 P.2d at 1120 ; Stauffer v. Karabin, 30 Colo.App. 357, 364 , 492 P.2d 862, 865 (1971). 1992See Mallett v. Pirkey, 171 Colo. 271, 282 , 466 P.2d 466, 471 (1970); Martin, 36 Colo.App. at 258-59 , 540 P.2d at 1120 ; Stauffer v. Karabin, 30 Colo.App. 357, 364 , 492 P.2d 862, 865 (1971). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
National Advertising Co. v. Department of Highways
green
1 sentence1988We considered a similar claim in National Advertising Company v. Department of Highways, 718 P.2d 1038 (Colo.1986), in which National argued that the state should be estopped from requiring National to secure a sign permit under the Outdoor Advertising Act due to the fact that Arapahoe County had already issued National a permit for the construction of a billboard in an area along a state highway encompassed by the provisions of the Outdoor Advertising Act. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Miller v. California
green
2 sentences1976Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 , 93 S.Ct. 2607 , 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973). 1976Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15 , 93 S.Ct. 2607 , 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Collins v. Meeker
green
2 sentences1971Mallett v. Pirkey, supra ; Foose v. Haymond, 135 Colo. 275 , 310 P.2d 722 ; Colorado Jury Instructions 15:1, 15:11, supra; Comment, Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice, 55 Cal.L.Rev. 1396; Collins v. Meeker, 198 Kan. 390 , 424 P.2d 488 . 1971Mallett v. Pirkey, supra ; Foose v. Haymond, 135 Colo. 275 , 310 P.2d 722 ; Colorado Jury Instructions 15:1, 15:11, supra; Comment, Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice, 55 Cal.L.Rev. 1396; Collins v. Meeker, 198 Kan. 390 , 424 P.2d 488 . | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Foose v. Haymond
green
2 sentences1971Mallett v. Pirkey, supra ; Foose v. Haymond, 135 Colo. 275 , 310 P.2d 722 ; Colorado Jury Instructions 15:1, 15:11, supra; Comment, Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice, 55 Cal.L.Rev. 1396; Collins v. Meeker, 198 Kan. 390 , 424 P.2d 488 . 1971Mallett v. Pirkey, supra ; Foose v. Haymond, 135 Colo. 275 , 310 P.2d 722 ; Colorado Jury Instructions 15:1, 15:11, supra; Comment, Informed Consent in Medical Malpractice, 55 Cal.L.Rev. 1396; Collins v. Meeker, 198 Kan. 390 , 424 P.2d 488 . | 1 | 1971–1971 |
City of Cedartown v. Pickett
green
2 sentences1944The court held that the act by its very terms was applicable to the United States and to the several states and territories and cited and quoted from the opinion in Bowsman v. Peterson, 45 F. Supp. 741 , in which the court states: “The Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act * * * was prompted by at least two considerations, first, the maintenance in the armed forces of a reasonable measure of that unbothered serenity and security in respect of personal responsibilities *16 which effectively promotes military efficiency and the national defense; and secondly, the assurance that in the field of i 1944The court held that the act by its very terms was applicable to the United States and to the several states and territories and cited and quoted from the opinion in Bowsman v. Peterson, 45 F. Supp. 741 , in which the court states: “The Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act * * * was prompted by at least two considerations, first, the maintenance in the armed forces of a reasonable measure of that unbothered serenity and security in respect of personal responsibilities *16 which effectively promotes military efficiency and the national defense; and secondly, the assurance that in the field of i | 1 | 1944–1944 |
Bowsman v. Peterson
green
1 sentence1944The court held that the act by its very terms was applicable to the United States and to the several states and territories and cited and quoted from the opinion in Bowsman v. Peterson, 45 F. Supp. 741 , in which the court states: “The Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act * * * was prompted by at least two considerations, first, the maintenance in the armed forces of a reasonable measure of that unbothered serenity and security in respect of personal responsibilities *16 which effectively promotes military efficiency and the national defense; and secondly, the assurance that in the field of i | 1 | 1944–1944 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.