national standard in Michigan

20 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2024 5 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

Case	Followed	Cited
Mazey v. Adamsgreen michctapp · 1991 · cited in 2 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 2 sentences 2017Cf. Mazey, 191 Mich App at 331-332 (finding that a trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that “the standard of care for a general practitioner in Michigan was not different from that of a similar practitioner in California” when the doctor “testified that, on the basis of his conversations with osteopathic general practitioners, he learned that the standard of practice . . . was national in scope”). 2017Cf. Mazey, 191 Mich App at 331-332 (finding that a trial court did not abuse its discretion in concluding that “the standard of care for a general practitioner in Michigan was not different from that of a similar practitioner in California” when the doctor “testified that, on the basis of his conversations with osteopathic general practitioners, he learned that the standard of practice . . . was national in scope”).	2	2
Naccarato v. Grobgreen mich · 1970 · cited in 5 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1973–2024 2 sentences 2024As this Court has explained, a “specialist is not measured by a local rule but by a national standard because: ‘The reliance of the public upon the skills of a specialist and the wealth and sources of his knowledge are not limited to the geographic area in which he practices.’ ” Francisco v Parchment Med Clinic, PC, 407 Mich 325, 328 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979), quoting Naccarato v Grob, 384 Mich 248, 253-254 ; 180 NW2d 788 (1970). 3 person is licensed as a health professional in this state or another state and meets the following criteria: (a) If the party against whom or on whose behalf the testimo 2024As this Court has explained, a “specialist is not measured by a local rule but by a national standard because: ‘The reliance of the public upon the skills of a specialist and the wealth and sources of his knowledge are not limited to the geographic area in which he practices.’ ” Francisco v Parchment Med Clinic, PC, 407 Mich 325, 328 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979), quoting Naccarato v Grob, 384 Mich 248, 253-254 ; 180 NW2d 788 (1970). 3 person is licensed as a health professional in this state or another state and meets the following criteria: (a) If the party against whom or on whose behalf the testimo	1	5
Thomas v. McPherson Community Health Centergreen michctapp · 1986 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 2 sentences 2002See, e.g., Thomas v McPherson Community Health Ctr, 155 Mich App 700, 708 ; 400 NW2d 629 (1986); Swanek v Hutzel Hosp, 115 Mich App 254, 257 ; 320 NW2d 234 (1982); McCullough v Hutzel Hosp, 88 Mich App 235, 241 ; 276 NW2d 569 (1979). 2002See, e.g., Thomas v McPherson Community Health Ctr, 155 Mich App 700, 708 ; 400 NW2d 629 (1986); Swanek v Hutzel Hosp, 115 Mich App 254, 257 ; 320 NW2d 234 (1982); McCullough v Hutzel Hosp, 88 Mich App 235, 241 ; 276 NW2d 569 (1979).	1	1
Bahr v. Harper-Grace Hospitalsgreen michctapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994 1 sentence 1994See Bahr, supra. While we believe that a general practitioner who performs a specialized procedure that is essentially uniform throughout the country should be held to the national standard of care, the district court did not *427 abuse its discretion in refusing to apply LeBlanc to the facts of this case.	1	1
Mitz v. Sterngreen michctapp · 1970 · cited in 1 Michigan opinions naming this issue, 1980–1980	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (31)

Case	Cited	Years
Francisco v. Parchment Medical Clinic, PC green mich · 1979 2 sentences 2024As this Court has explained, a “specialist is not measured by a local rule but by a national standard because: ‘The reliance of the public upon the skills of a specialist and the wealth and sources of his knowledge are not limited to the geographic area in which he practices.’ ” Francisco v Parchment Med Clinic, PC, 407 Mich 325, 328 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979), quoting Naccarato v Grob, 384 Mich 248, 253-254 ; 180 NW2d 788 (1970). 3 person is licensed as a health professional in this state or another state and meets the following criteria: (a) If the party against whom or on whose behalf the testimo 2024As this Court has explained, a “specialist is not measured by a local rule but by a national standard because: ‘The reliance of the public upon the skills of a specialist and the wealth and sources of his knowledge are not limited to the geographic area in which he practices.’ ” Francisco v Parchment Med Clinic, PC, 407 Mich 325, 328 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979), quoting Naccarato v Grob, 384 Mich 248, 253-254 ; 180 NW2d 788 (1970). 3 person is licensed as a health professional in this state or another state and meets the following criteria: (a) If the party against whom or on whose behalf the testimo	3	1980–2024
Johanna Woodard v. University of Mich Medical Ctr green mich · 2006 2 sentences 2024However, if the party against whom or on whose behalf the testimony is offered is a specialist who is board certified, the expert witness must be a specialist who is board certified in that specialty. (b) Subject to subdivision (c) [which is inapplicable to these cases], during the year immediately preceding the date of the occurrence that is the basis for the claim or action, devoted a majority of his or her professional time to either or both of the following: (i) The active clinical practice of the same health profession in which the party against whom or on whose behalf the testimony is of 2024However, if the party against whom or on whose behalf the testimony is offered is a specialist who is board certified, the expert witness must be a specialist who is board certified in that specialty. (b) Subject to subdivision (c) [which is inapplicable to these cases], during the year immediately preceding the date of the occurrence that is the basis for the claim or action, devoted a majority of his or her professional time to either or both of the following: (i) The active clinical practice of the same health profession in which the party against whom or on whose behalf the testimony is of	2	2024–2024
Siirila v. Barrios green mich · 1976 2 sentences 2002In his concurring opinion in Siirila v Barrios, 398 Mich 576, 625-630 ; 248 NW2d 171 (1976), Justice Williams argued for abandonment of the locality rule in favor of a national standard of care for all medical caregivers. 2002In his concurring opinion in Siirila v Barrios, 398 Mich 576, 625-630 ; 248 NW2d 171 (1976), Justice Williams argued for abandonment of the locality rule in favor of a national standard of care for all medical caregivers.	2	1979–2002
LeBlanc v. Lentini green michctapp · 1978 2 sentences 1978First, the plaintiffs argue the trial court erred in ruling that Dr. Hammer was a general surgeon, and second, the plaintiffs argue that the recent case of LeBlanc v Lentini, 82 Mich App 5 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978), warrants the application of a national standard in the case at bar. 1978First, the plaintiffs argue the trial court erred in ruling that Dr. Hammer was a general surgeon, and second, the plaintiffs argue that the recent case of LeBlanc v Lentini, 82 Mich App 5 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978), warrants the application of a national standard in the case at bar.	2	1978–1980
State v. Mount green mont · 2003 2 sentences 2024State v Mount, 317 Mont 481 ; 2003 MT 275 ; 78 P3d 829 (2003). 36 opinion address the reality that the registry’s information is a truthful and public record: “accurate, nonprivate information about the registrants’ convictions” in a public trial and court of law is not an affirmative restraint sufficient to override the Legislature’s choices. 117 For advancing traditional aims of punishment, the majority opinion cites Betts, concluding that because the registry can deter wrongdoing, it is punitive in nature. 2024State v Mount, 317 Mont 481 ; 2003 MT 275 ; 78 P3d 829 (2003). 36 opinion address the reality that the registry’s information is a truthful and public record: “accurate, nonprivate information about the registrants’ convictions” in a public trial and court of law is not an affirmative restraint sufficient to override the Legislature’s choices. 117 For advancing traditional aims of punishment, the majority opinion cites Betts, concluding that because the registry can deter wrongdoing, it is punitive in nature.	1	2024–2024
Jalaba v. Borovoy green michctapp · 1994 2 sentences 2023Jalaba v Borovoy, 206 Mich App 17, 21-22 ; 520 NW2d 349 (1994). 2023Jalaba v Borovoy, 206 Mich App 17, 21-22 ; 520 NW2d 349 (1994).	1	2023–2023
Grand Trunk Western Railroad v. Auto Warehousing Co. green michctapp · 2004 1 sentence 2021Smith v Globe Life Ins Co, 460 Mich 446 , 455 n 2; 597 NW2d 28 (1999); Grand Trunk W R, Inc v Auto Warehousing Co, 262 Mich App 345, 350 ; 686 NW2d 756 (2004). -4- The trial court erred in denying National’s motion for summary disposition by finding that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether plaintiff was operating a business that qualified for a commercial automobile insurance policy.	1	2021–2021
Grand Trunk WRR, Inc. v. Auto Warehousing Co. green michctapp · 2004 1 sentence 2021Smith v Globe Life Ins Co, 460 Mich 446 , 455 n 2; 597 NW2d 28 (1999); Grand Trunk W R, Inc v Auto Warehousing Co, 262 Mich App 345, 350 ; 686 NW2d 756 (2004). -4- The trial court erred in denying National’s motion for summary disposition by finding that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether plaintiff was operating a business that qualified for a commercial automobile insurance policy.	1	2021–2021
Smith v. Globe Life Insurance green mich · 1999 2 sentences 2021Smith v Globe Life Ins Co, 460 Mich 446 , 455 n 2; 597 NW2d 28 (1999); Grand Trunk W R, Inc v Auto Warehousing Co, 262 Mich App 345, 350 ; 686 NW2d 756 (2004). -4- The trial court erred in denying National’s motion for summary disposition by finding that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether plaintiff was operating a business that qualified for a commercial automobile insurance policy. 2021Smith v Globe Life Ins Co, 460 Mich 446 , 455 n 2; 597 NW2d 28 (1999); Grand Trunk W R, Inc v Auto Warehousing Co, 262 Mich App 345, 350 ; 686 NW2d 756 (2004). -4- The trial court erred in denying National’s motion for summary disposition by finding that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether plaintiff was operating a business that qualified for a commercial automobile insurance policy.	1	2021–2021
McCullough v. Hutzel Hospital green michctapp · 1979 2 sentences 2002See, e.g., Thomas v McPherson Community Health Ctr, 155 Mich App 700, 708 ; 400 NW2d 629 (1986); Swanek v Hutzel Hosp, 115 Mich App 254, 257 ; 320 NW2d 234 (1982); McCullough v Hutzel Hosp, 88 Mich App 235, 241 ; 276 NW2d 569 (1979). 2002See, e.g., Thomas v McPherson Community Health Ctr, 155 Mich App 700, 708 ; 400 NW2d 629 (1986); Swanek v Hutzel Hosp, 115 Mich App 254, 257 ; 320 NW2d 234 (1982); McCullough v Hutzel Hosp, 88 Mich App 235, 241 ; 276 NW2d 569 (1979).	1	2002–2002
Swanek v. Hutzel Hospital green michctapp · 1982 2 sentences 2002See, e.g., Thomas v McPherson Community Health Ctr, 155 Mich App 700, 708 ; 400 NW2d 629 (1986); Swanek v Hutzel Hosp, 115 Mich App 254, 257 ; 320 NW2d 234 (1982); McCullough v Hutzel Hosp, 88 Mich App 235, 241 ; 276 NW2d 569 (1979). 2002See, e.g., Thomas v McPherson Community Health Ctr, 155 Mich App 700, 708 ; 400 NW2d 629 (1986); Swanek v Hutzel Hosp, 115 Mich App 254, 257 ; 320 NW2d 234 (1982); McCullough v Hutzel Hosp, 88 Mich App 235, 241 ; 276 NW2d 569 (1979).	1	2002–2002
Jones v. Porretta green mich · 1987 1 sentence 2002Jones, supra at 151-156 , 405 N.W.2d 863 . [11] In his concurring opinion in Siirila v. Barrios, 398 Mich. 576, 625-630 , 248 N.W.2d 171 (1976), Justice Williams argued for abandonment of the locality rule in favor of a national standard of care for all medical caregivers.	1	2002–2002
Cox v. Flint Board of Hospital Managers green michctapp · 2000 2 sentences 2001Id. at 79 . 2001Id. at 79 .	1	2001–2001
Carlton v. St John Hospital neutral michctapp · 1989 2 sentences 2000Id. at 508 ; Carlton v St John Hosp, 182 Mich App 166, 171-172 ; 451 NW2d 543 (1989). 2000Id. at 508 ; Carlton v St John Hosp, 182 Mich App 166, 171-172 ; 451 NW2d 543 (1989).	1	2000–2000
Mulholland v. DEC International Corp. green mich · 1989 1 sentence 2000Mulholland, supra. Even if we could conclude that the admission of this evidence was erroneous, reversal is not required unless there is prejudicial error.	1	2000–2000
McDOUGALL v. ELIUK green michctapp · 1996 1 sentence 2000Id. at 508 ; Carlton v St John Hosp, 182 Mich App 166, 171-172 ; 451 NW2d 543 (1989).	1	2000–2000
Birmingham v. Vance green michctapp · 1994 2 sentences 1994However, the preservation of the locality rule is not a realistic manner for evaluation of the standard of care as stated by this Court in Birmingham v Vance, 204 Mich App 418 ; 516 NW2d 95 (1994). 1994However, the preservation of the locality rule is not a realistic manner for evaluation of the standard of care as stated by this Court in Birmingham v Vance, 204 Mich App 418 ; 516 NW2d 95 (1994).	1	1994–1994
Roberts v. Young green mich · 1963 2 sentences 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23	1	1980–1980
Giacobazzi v. Fetzer green michctapp · 1967 2 sentences 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23	1	1980–1980
Delahunt v. Finton green mich · 1928 2 sentences 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23	1	1980–1980
Zanzon v. Whittaker neutral mich · 1945 2 sentences 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23	1	1980–1980
Coger v. MacKinaw Products Co. green michctapp · 1973 2 sentences 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23	1	1980–1980
Johnson v. City of Detroit green michctapp · 1977	1	1980–1980
Marchlewicz v. Stanton neutral michctapp · 1973 2 sentences 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23	1	1980–1980
Lince v. Monson green mich · 1961 2 sentences 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23	1	1980–1980
Blanchard v. Monical MacHinery Co. green michctapp · 1978 2 sentences 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23	1	1980–1980
McPhee v. Bay City Samaritan Hospital neutral michctapp · 1968 2 sentences 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23 1980Affirmed, with costs. 1 Plaintiff, Rose Patelczyk, is now deceased. 2 Blanchard v Monical Machinery Co, 84 Mich App 279, 282 ; 269 NW2d 564 (1978), Zanzon v Whittaker, 310 Mich 340 ; 17 NW2d 206 (1945). 3 Lince vMonson, 363 Mich 135 ; 108 NW2d 845 (1961). 4 369 Mich 133 ; 119 NW2d 627 (1963). 5 407 Mich 325 ; 285 NW2d 39 (1979). 6 82 Mich App 5, 10 ; 266 NW2d 643 (1978). 7 Mitz v Stern, 27 Mich App 459 ; 183 NW2d 608 (1970), Giacobazzi v Fetzer, 6 Mich App 308 ; 149 NW2d 222 (1967), McPhee v Bay City Samaritan Hospital, 10 Mich App 567 ; 159 NW2d 880 (1968), Delahunt v Fenton, 244 Mich 226, 23	1	1980–1980
Wellford v. Hardin green mdd · 1970	1	1974–1974
Ginzburg v. United States green scotus · 1966	1	1972–1972
Jacobellis v. Ohio green scotus · 1964	1	1972–1972
A Book Named \John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure\" v. Attorney General of Massachusetts" green scotus · 1966	1	1972–1972

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2912a (8) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 600.2169 (5) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.17001 (3) MI § Mich. Comp. Laws § 333.18001 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

DC 42 (1967–2023) TN 41 (1967–2022) CA 27 (1941–2022) NC 27 (1948–2026) ID 26 (1987–2025) TX 23 (1972–2023) IL 23 (1943–2017) NY 22 (1904–2025) LA 21 (1943–2026) MI 20 (1972–2024) MS 18 (1986–2026) CT 18 (1965–2016) AL 17 (1970–2026) WA 17 (1967–2025) PA 17 (1938–2024) RI 12 (1970–2015) MT 11 (1981–2024) FL 10 (1941–2017) NJ 8 (1964–2019) UT 8 (1938–2024) GA 8 (1947–2009) CO 8 (1944–2008) MO 8 (1965–2022) AR 7 (1943–2026) AZ 7 (1968–2025) MA 7 (1980–2023) OH 6 (1971–2022) OR 6 (1966–2024) HI 5 (1991–2024) MD 5 (1960–2013) OK 5 (1946–2026) VA 5 (1974–2004) NM 4 (1970–2025) WV 4 (1982–2020) KS 4 (1966–2013) IN 4 (1971–2002) NE 4 (1980–2024) WI 3 (1963–1994) SD 3 (1989–2014) MN 3 (1977–2017) DE 3 (1992–1999) NV 2 (1988–1989) AK 2 (1978–1991) WY 2 (2002–2003) SC 2 (1984–1993)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check

Your account

Appearance