Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dring v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.green2 sentences2011However, equitable es-toppel “presupposes that the plaintiff knows of the facts underlying the cause of action but delayed filing suit because of the defendant’s conduct.” See Bell v. Fowler, 99 F.3d 262 , 266 n. 2 (8th Cir. 1996) (citing Dring v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 58 F.3d 1323, 1329 (8th Cir. 1995)) (emphasis added). 2008However, equitable estoppel " presupposes that the plaintiff knows of the facts underlying the cause of action but delayed filing suit because of the defendant's conduct." See Bell v. Fowler, 99 F.3d 262 , 266 n. 2 (8th Cir. 1996) (citing Dring v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 58 F.3d 1323, 1329 (8th Cir. 1995)) (emphasis added). | 3 | 3 |
Noble v. Yorkegreen1 sentence2021Id.; see also Noble v. Yorke, 490 So. 2d 29, 31 (Fla. 1986) (holding absent specific statutory provision, there is no rule of law which in general exempts statutory rights and defenses from the operation of the doctrine of equitable estoppel). | 1 | 1 |
Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.red2 sentences2001See Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656 , 107 S.Ct. 2617 , 96 L.Ed.2d 572 (1987); Baker v. Gulf & Western Indus., 850 F.2d 1480 (11th Cir.1988). 2001See Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656 , 107 S.Ct. 2617 , 96 L.Ed.2d 572 (1987); Baker v. Gulf & Western Indus., 850 F.2d 1480 (11th Cir.1988). | 1 | 1 |
Rabinowitz v. Town of Bay Harbor Islandsgreen1 sentence1999See Rabinowitz v. Town of Bay Harbor Islands, 178 So.2d 9 (Fla.1965); Hood v. Hood, 392 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Glantzis v. State Auto. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Major League Baseball v. Morsani
green
2 sentences2011“The doctrine has also been recognized as a valid defense to a limitations-period defense.” Id. (citations omitted). 2008"The doctrine has also been recognized as a valid defense to a limitations-period defense." Id. (citations omitted). | 3 | 2003–2011 |
Bonnie Bell v. Randy Alan Fowler
green
2 sentences2011However, equitable es-toppel “presupposes that the plaintiff knows of the facts underlying the cause of action but delayed filing suit because of the defendant’s conduct.” See Bell v. Fowler, 99 F.3d 262 , 266 n. 2 (8th Cir. 1996) (citing Dring v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 58 F.3d 1323, 1329 (8th Cir. 1995)) (emphasis added). 2008However, equitable estoppel " presupposes that the plaintiff knows of the facts underlying the cause of action but delayed filing suit because of the defendant's conduct." See Bell v. Fowler, 99 F.3d 262 , 266 n. 2 (8th Cir. 1996) (citing Dring v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 58 F.3d 1323, 1329 (8th Cir. 1995)) (emphasis added). | 3 | 2003–2011 |
Raynor v. Florida State Lodge
green
1 sentence2025In reaching this conclusion, we acknowledge Appellant’s reliance upon Raynor v. Florida State Lodge, 987 So. 2d 152 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Beyer v. CITY OF MARATHON
green
1 sentence2013It would be patently unfair, if not absurd, to allow the county, and later the City, to delay the timely processing of the BUD application, provide a determination after the expiration of the purported limitations period, and then claim the expiration of the limitations period as a defense. ■ Beyer, 37 So.3d at 935 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Joe Allen Baker v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc., Joe Allen Baker v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc.
green
1 sentence2001See Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co., 482 U.S. 656 , 107 S.Ct. 2617 , 96 L.Ed.2d 572 (1987); Baker v. Gulf & Western Indus., 850 F.2d 1480 (11th Cir.1988). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Hood v. Hood
green
1 sentence1999See Rabinowitz v. Town of Bay Harbor Islands, 178 So.2d 9 (Fla.1965); Hood v. Hood, 392 So.2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Glantzis v. State Auto. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.