Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1940–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rivera v. Stategreen1 sentence2019A postconviction defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing only when the motion presents “allegations constituting a prima facie case for relief.” Rivera v. State, 995 So. 2d 191, 200 (Fla. 2008). | 1 | 1 |
Leonard v. McIntoshgreen1 sentence1971See Leonard v. McIntosh, Fla.App. 1970, 237 So.2d 809 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gulf Life Insurance Co. v. Ellis
neutral
2 sentences1956Co. v. Ellis, 145 Fla. 262 , 198 So. 836 , viz.: "`It is certainly not an unreasonable requirement that the insured be alive and in good health on the date of the delivery of the policy.'" In Aetna Ins. 1956Co. v. Ellis, 145 Fla. 262 , 198 So. 836 , viz.: "`It is certainly not an unreasonable requirement that the insured be alive and in good health on the date of the delivery of the policy.'" In Aetna Ins. | 3 | 1955–1956 |
Ramey v. Carolina Life Insurance
green
2 sentences1981At least one jurisdiction has imposed such a condition precedent. *1159 In Ramey v. Carolina Life Insurance Co., 244 S.C. 16 , 135 S.E.2d 362 (1964), an insured sued an insurer for injuries sustained when his wife attempted to murder him by arsenic poisoning. 1981At least one jurisdiction has imposed such a condition precedent. *1159 In Ramey v. Carolina Life Insurance Co., 244 S.C. 16 , 135 S.E.2d 362 (1964), an insured sued an insurer for injuries sustained when his wife attempted to murder him by arsenic poisoning. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Brown v. State
green
1 sentence1975The circumstances of the initial detention in this case are remarkably similar to those in Brown v. State, 62 So.2d 348 (Fla. 1952), in which this court found that such a search and seizure was an unreasonable violation of constitutional rights. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Aetna Ins. Co. Of Hartford, Conn. v. Jeremiah Provident Fire Ins. Co. v. Jeremiah
green
1 sentence1956Co. of Hartford, Conn. v. Jeremiah, supra, the circuit court of the 10th circuit observed that the prohibition against additional insurance in a policy containing the identical language to that involved in this case was an express warranty by the insured that no other insurance would be taken out. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Westmoreland v. Gulf Life Insurance
neutral
1 sentence1940Westmoreland v. Gulf Life Insurance Company, 57 Ga. App. 303 , 195 So. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.