8 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Coffin v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1996“The language requested . . . was used in Coffin v. United States, 156 U. S. 432, 458 (15 SC 394, 39 LE 481) in a legalistic discussion of the concept of the presumption of innocence, but was not intended to be required in a jury charge. [Cit.] It is not essential to the jury’s understanding of the principle and is arguably very obscure and overly narrow in meaning; moreover, it might be seen by a jury as limiting the defendant’s right to the presumption in some cases depending on the nature of the evidence.” Rigsby, supra. 6. 1987The language requested, emphasized above, was used in Coffin v. United States, 156 U. S. 432, 458 (15 SC 394, 39 LE 481) in a legalistic discussion of the concept of the presumption of innocence, but was not intended to be required in a jury charge. | 2 | 2 |
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Caseyred2 sentences1999Although, for the reasons discussed in Division 2, the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Casey has no constitutional bearing in this case, it does have significance in its invocation of the principle of stare decisis as support for reaffirmance of the controversial recognition of a woman's right to an abortion. [W]e recognize that no judicial system could do society's work if it eyed each issue afresh in every case that raised it. [Cit.] Indeed, the very concept of the rule of law underlying our own Constitution requires such continuity over time that a respect for preceden 1999Although, for the reasons discussed in Division 2, the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Casey has no constitutional bearing in this case, it does have significance in its invocation of the principle of stare decisis as support for reaffirmance of the controversial recognition of a woman’s right to an abortion. [W]e recognize that no judicial system could do society’s work if it eyed each issue afresh in every case that raised it. [Cit.] Indeed, the very concept of the rule of law underlying our own Constitution requires such continuity over time that a respect for preceden | 1 | 1 |
Rigsby v. Stategreen1 sentence1996“The language requested . . . was used in Coffin v. United States, 156 U. S. 432, 458 (15 SC 394, 39 LE 481) in a legalistic discussion of the concept of the presumption of innocence, but was not intended to be required in a jury charge. [Cit.] It is not essential to the jury’s understanding of the principle and is arguably very obscure and overly narrow in meaning; moreover, it might be seen by a jury as limiting the defendant’s right to the presumption in some cases depending on the nature of the evidence.” Rigsby, supra. 6. | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Willisgreen2 sentences1995See Williams v. Willis, 204 Ga. App. 328, 329 ( 419 SE2d 139 ) (1992). 1 Ready was required under 49 USC § 10330 to designate an agent for service of process by filing a form with the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Georgia Public Service Commission. 1995See Williams v. Willis, 204 Ga. App. 328, 329 ( 419 SE2d 139 ) (1992). 1 Ready was required under 49 USC § 10330 to designate an agent for service of process by filing a form with the Interstate Commerce Commission and the Georgia Public Service Commission. | 1 | 1 |
Hill v. Stategreen2 sentences1987See Hill v. State, 256 Ga. 614, 615 ( 351 SE2d 451 ). 1987See Hill v. State, 256 Ga. 614, 615 ( 351 SE2d 451 ). | 1 | 1 |
Shuman v. Dyessgreen2 sentences1987See Shuman v. Dyess, 175 Ga. App. 213, 215 (2) ( 333 SE2d 379 ) (1985). 1987See Shuman v. Dyess, 175 Ga. App. 213, 215 (2) ( 333 SE2d 379 ) (1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Thomasville v. Shank
green
1 sentence2018Id. at 625 (1), 437 S.E.2d 306 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Hibbs v. City of Riverdale
green
1 sentence2018(Citation and footnote omitted.) Hibbs, 267 Ga. at 338 . 2 its stead a Tort Claims Act waiver,2] as that amendment deals with the concept of waiver, and in the case of nuisance we are dealing not with a waiver of but an exception to sovereign immunity. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Arnovitz v. Murphy Real Estate Co.
neutral
2 sentences1988Homeowners Assn. v. First United Lutheran Church, 241 Ga. 228 (2) ( 244 SE2d 856 ); Arnovitz v. Murphy Real Estate Co., 164 Ga. 739 ( 139 SE 530 ). 1988Homeowners Assn. v. First United Lutheran Church, 241 Ga. 228 (2) ( 244 SE2d 856 ); Arnovitz v. Murphy Real Estate Co., 164 Ga. 739 ( 139 SE 530 ). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Pinetree Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. First United Lutheran Church
green
2 sentences1988Homeowners Assn. v. First United Lutheran Church, 241 Ga. 228 (2) ( 244 SE2d 856 ); Arnovitz v. Murphy Real Estate Co., 164 Ga. 739 ( 139 SE 530 ). 1988Homeowners Assn. v. First United Lutheran Church, 241 Ga. 228 (2) ( 244 SE2d 856 ); Arnovitz v. Murphy Real Estate Co., 164 Ga. 739 ( 139 SE 530 ). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.