Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1876–1971 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Krauss v. State
neutral
2 sentences1971Krauss v. State (1951), 229 Ind. 625 , 100 N. E. 2d 824 . 1971Krauss v. State (1951), 229 Ind. 625 , 100 N. E. 2d 824 . | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Schutz v. Leary
neutral
2 sentences1962This court in the case of Schutz v. Leary (1952), 123 Ind. App. 100 , 106 N. E. 2d 705 , at 123 Ind. App. page 106, stated: “While the qualifications of the privileged communications rule in this state has not been extended to apply to such communications between an attorney and a client in the preparation and execution of a deed, it is apparent upon sound reasoning and a consideration of the authorities that the exception to the general rule regarding privileged communications should apply in the case of the circumstances surrounding the preparation and execution of a deed the same as it does 1962This court in the case of Schutz v. Leary (1952), 123 Ind. App. 100 , 106 N. E. 2d 705 , at 123 Ind. App. page 106, stated: “While the qualifications of the privileged communications rule in this state has not been extended to apply to such communications between an attorney and a client in the preparation and execution of a deed, it is apparent upon sound reasoning and a consideration of the authorities that the exception to the general rule regarding privileged communications should apply in the case of the circumstances surrounding the preparation and execution of a deed the same as it does | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Pennsylvania Co. v. Roney
neutral
1 sentence1911Pennsylvania Co. v. Roney (1883), 89 Ind. 453, 457 , 46 Am. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
State ex rel. Colscott v. King
green
1 sentence1903In State, ex rel., v. King, 154 Ind. 621 , and State, ex rel., v. Brockman, 154 Ind. 695 , the court upheld the right of the Mr. Colscott, mentioned in the answer now before us, to examine the public records of the county auditor .and the county treasurer, to discover the condition of the public revenue, and to ascertain if the affairs of the county had been honestly and faithfully administered by the public officials. | 1 | 1903–1903 |
State ex rel. Colscott v. Brockman
neutral
1 sentence1903In State, ex rel., v. King, 154 Ind. 621 , and State, ex rel., v. Brockman, 154 Ind. 695 , the court upheld the right of the Mr. Colscott, mentioned in the answer now before us, to examine the public records of the county auditor .and the county treasurer, to discover the condition of the public revenue, and to ascertain if the affairs of the county had been honestly and faithfully administered by the public officials. | 1 | 1903–1903 |
Town Council of Cahaba v. Burnett
green
1 sentence1892In the case of Peckham, v. Hendren, 76 Ind. 47 , the court quotes with approval the following language from Town Council of Cahaba v. Burnett, 34 Ala. 400 : “ No man can be heard to say that he had the right and the law with him, but he feared his adversary would carry him into court, and that being thereby deprived of his free will, he yielded to the wrong, and the court must assist him.” A person who is conscious of being in the right should not decide his case against himself by tamely yielding to the demands of another who is in the wrong and then ask the court to protect him. | 1 | 1892–1892 |
Peckham v. Hendren
green
1 sentence1892In the case of Peckham, v. Hendren, 76 Ind. 47 , the court quotes with approval the following language from Town Council of Cahaba v. Burnett, 34 Ala. 400 : “ No man can be heard to say that he had the right and the law with him, but he feared his adversary would carry him into court, and that being thereby deprived of his free will, he yielded to the wrong, and the court must assist him.” A person who is conscious of being in the right should not decide his case against himself by tamely yielding to the demands of another who is in the wrong and then ask the court to protect him. | 1 | 1892–1892 |
Hichcox v. Eastman
neutral
1 sentence1886Juris. 541; Kelly v. Stinson, 8 Blackf. 387 ; Young v. Pickens, 49 Ind. 23 ; Holdich v. Holdich, 2 Y. & C. | 1 | 1886–1886 |
Young v. Pickens
green
1 sentence1886Juris. 541; Kelly v. Stinson, 8 Blackf. 387 ; Young v. Pickens, 49 Ind. 23 ; Holdich v. Holdich, 2 Y. & C. | 1 | 1886–1886 |
Durham v. State
neutral
1 sentence1885State v. Kuns, 5 Blackf. 314 ; Durham v. State, 1 Blackf. 33 ; State v. Hutzell, 53 Ind. 160 . | 1 | 1885–1885 |
State v. Kuns
neutral
1 sentence1885State v. Kuns, 5 Blackf. 314 ; Durham v. State, 1 Blackf. 33 ; State v. Hutzell, 53 Ind. 160 . | 1 | 1885–1885 |
State v. Hutzell
neutral
1 sentence1885State v. Kuns, 5 Blackf. 314 ; Durham v. State, 1 Blackf. 33 ; State v. Hutzell, 53 Ind. 160 . | 1 | 1885–1885 |
Lane v. Albright
green
1 sentence1876The case of Lane v. Albright, 49 Ind. 275 , is in harmony with the above authorities in principle, though not in point as to fact with the case we are considering. | 1 | 1876–1876 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.