Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1912–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In re Mental Health of D. B. W.green2 sentences2023See In re Mental Health of D.B.W., 1980 OK 125, ¶ 9, 616 P.2d 1149, 1152 ("[w]e find that the Oklahoma Mental Health Law contains sufficient constitutional safeguards"); see also Heryford v. Parker , 396 F.2d 393 (10th Cir. 1968) (holding that a mentally deficient person was denied due process when the person was not afforded legal counsel at a hearing which resulted in involuntary commitment to a state institution). ¶12 In light of the above authorities and analysis of the statutes as a whole, committed individuals have a statutory right to counsel for all hearings that arise from a Board rec 2023See In re Mental Health of D.B.W., 1980 OK 125, ¶ 9, 616 P.2d 1149, 1152 ("[w]e find that the Oklahoma Mental Health Law contains sufficient constitutional safeguards"); see also Heryford v. Parker , 396 F.2d 393 (10th Cir. 1968) (holding that a mentally deficient person was denied due process when the person was not afforded legal counsel at a hearing which resulted in involuntary commitment to a state institution). ¶12 In light of the above authorities and analysis of the statutes as a whole, committed individuals have a statutory right to counsel for all hearings that arise from a Board rec | 1 | 1 |
Heryford v. Parkergreen2 sentences2023See In re Mental Health of D.B.W., 1980 OK 125 , ¶ 9, 616 P.2d 1149 , 1152 ("[w]e find that the Oklahoma Mental Health Law contains sufficient constitutional safeguards"); see also Heryford v. Parker , 396 F.2d 393 (10th Cir. 1968) (holding that a mentally deficient person was denied due process when the person was not afforded legal counsel at a hearing which resulted in involuntary commitment to a state institution). ¶12 In light of the above authorities and analysis of the statutes as a whole, committed individuals have a statutory right to counsel for all hearings that arise from a Board r 2023See In re Mental Health of D.B.W., 1980 OK 125, ¶ 9, 616 P.2d 1149, 1152 ("[w]e find that the Oklahoma Mental Health Law contains sufficient constitutional safeguards"); see also Heryford v. Parker , 396 F.2d 393 (10th Cir. 1968) (holding that a mentally deficient person was denied due process when the person was not afforded legal counsel at a hearing which resulted in involuntary commitment to a state institution). ¶12 In light of the above authorities and analysis of the statutes as a whole, committed individuals have a statutory right to counsel for all hearings that arise from a Board rec | 1 | 1 |
Wilson v. Stategreen1 sentence1994See Green v. State, 281 P.2d 200, 202 (Okl.Cr. 1955) ("Upon failure of a trial court to comply with [section 894], the authorities hold presumption of prejudice arises.”), overruled on other grounds in Wilson v. State, 534 P.2d 1325, 1327 (Okl.Cr.1975). | 1 | 1 |
Green v. Stategreen1 sentence1994See Green v. State, 281 P.2d 200, 202 (Okl.Cr. 1955) ("Upon failure of a trial court to comply with [section 894], the authorities hold presumption of prejudice arises.”), overruled on other grounds in Wilson v. State, 534 P.2d 1325, 1327 (Okl.Cr.1975). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chickasha Cotton Oil Company v. Hancock
green
1 sentence1957Here, it was never claimed that there was a confidential relationship between Mulkey, and the plaintiff, or that the former was a fiduciary of the latter; and such relationship is not one of the seven essential elements of fraud referred to, supra. Nor does plaintiff claim there was initially any duty upon Mulkey tp make any disclosure, whatsoever to plaintiff, concerning the company’s bank account. | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Amos v. United States
green
2 sentences1941Examples of these are State v. Lock, 302 Mo. 400 , 259 S. W. 116 ; Amos v. United States, 255 U. S. 313 , 65 L. 1941Examples of these are State v. Lock, 302 Mo. 400 , 259 S. W. 116 ; Amos v. United States, 255 U. S. 313 , 65 L. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
State v. Lock
green
2 sentences1941Examples of these are State v. Lock, 302 Mo. 400 , 259 S. W. 116 ; Amos v. United States, 255 U. S. 313 , 65 L. 1941Examples of these are State v. Lock, 302 Mo. 400 , 259 S. W. 116 ; Amos v. United States, 255 U. S. 313 , 65 L. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Insurance Co. of North America v. Burton
green
2 sentences1935That a person may act in the capacity of agent for both parties where there is no conflict of interests in the doing of the several things which is expected by his respective principals, has been recognized by this court in the case of Insurance Company of North America v. Burton et al., 147 Okla. 112 , 294 P. 796 , the first syllabus of which we quote as follows: “Section 6723, C. 1935That a person may act in the capacity of agent for both parties where there is no conflict of interests in the doing of the several things which is expected by his respective principals, has been recognized by this court in the case of Insurance Company of North America v. Burton et al., 147 Okla. 112 , 294 P. 796 , the first syllabus of which we quote as follows: “Section 6723, C. | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Paris v. Sheppard
neutral
1 sentence1913Manifestly this is, in the main, a question of weight and not of relevancy/ There was an effort made to have the court modify the doctrine of State v. Stone in State v. Hibbard, 76 Kan. 376 , 92 Pac. 304 , but after a reconsideration of the question, and the authorities the rule admitting evidence of acts of sexual intercourse occurring after the one upon which a conviction is sought was reaffirmed, and it was held that the doctrine was sustained ‘not only by the better reason but by the greater weight of authority.' ” In the case of Woodruff v. State, 72 Neb. 815 , 101 N. W. 114 , it is said: | 1 | 1913–1913 |
State v. Hibbard
neutral
2 sentences1913Manifestly this is, in the main, a question of weight and not of relevancy/ There was an effort made to have the court modify the doctrine of State v. Stone in State v. Hibbard, 76 Kan. 376 , 92 Pac. 304 , but after a reconsideration of the question, and the authorities the rule admitting evidence of acts of sexual intercourse occurring after the one upon which a conviction is sought was reaffirmed, and it was held that the doctrine was sustained ‘not only by the better reason but by the greater weight of authority.' ” In the case of Woodruff v. State, 72 Neb. 815 , 101 N. W. 114 , it is said: 1913Manifestly this is, in the main, a question of weight and not of relevancy/ There was an effort made to have the court modify the doctrine of State v. Stone in State v. Hibbard, 76 Kan. 376 , 92 Pac. 304 , but after a reconsideration of the question, and the authorities the rule admitting evidence of acts of sexual intercourse occurring after the one upon which a conviction is sought was reaffirmed, and it was held that the doctrine was sustained ‘not only by the better reason but by the greater weight of authority.' ” In the case of Woodruff v. State, 72 Neb. 815 , 101 N. W. 114 , it is said: | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Dodge v. . Crandall
green
1 sentence1913Dodge v. Crandall, 30 N. Y. 294, 304 ; Brown v. Farmers’ Loan & T. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Woodruff v. State
neutral
1 sentence1913Manifestly this is, in the main, a question of weight and not of relevancy/ There was an effort made to have the court modify the doctrine of State v. Stone in State v. Hibbard, 76 Kan. 376 , 92 Pac. 304 , but after a reconsideration of the question, and the authorities the rule admitting evidence of acts of sexual intercourse occurring after the one upon which a conviction is sought was reaffirmed, and it was held that the doctrine was sustained ‘not only by the better reason but by the greater weight of authority.' ” In the case of Woodruff v. State, 72 Neb. 815 , 101 N. W. 114 , it is said: | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Summers v. Alexander
neutral
2 sentences1912No man can complain that .another has too implicitly relied' on the truth of things he has himself stated.’ ” Summers v. Alexander, 30 Okla. 198 , 120 Pac. 601 , contains a statement of the rule as it applies in certain classes of insurance cases, and the authorities applying the rule in such cases are there collected. 1912No man can complain that .another has too implicitly relied' on the truth of things he has himself stated.’ ” Summers v. Alexander, 30 Okla. 198 , 120 Pac. 601 , contains a statement of the rule as it applies in certain classes of insurance cases, and the authorities applying the rule in such cases are there collected. | 1 | 1912–1912 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.