Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Indiana opinions name it 3 courts 1989–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Stropes Ex Rel. Taylor v. Heritage House Childrens Center of Shelbyville, Inc.green2 sentences2008As an independent, alternate basis for reversing summary judgment, Stropes also found "that Heritage assumed a non-delega-ble duty to provide protection and care so as to fall within the common carrier exception.” Id. at 254 . 2003In ordering the case to proceed to trial, our supreme court stated that "given the degree of [Stropel's lack of autonomy and his dependence on Heritage for care and the degree of Heritage's control over [Stropes] and the circumstances in which he found himself, we find that Heritage assumed a non-delega-ble duty to provide protection and care so as to fall within the common carrier exception." Id. at 254 . | 2 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miller v. Griesel
green
2 sentences2017Miller v. Griesel (1974), 261 Ind. 604, 611 , 308 N.E.2d 701, 706 . 2017Miller v. Griesel (1974), 261 Ind. 604, 611 , 308 N.E.2d 701, 706 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Dickson v. Waldron
green
2 sentences2017This Court in Dickson stated that an enterprise which has induced an individual to give over the control of his personal comfort and safety to its care assumes a special duty to protect him from injury, particularly from its own employees. [Dickson v. Waldron, 135 Ind. 507 , 34 N.E. 506 (Ind. 1893).].... 2017This Court in Dickson stated that an enterprise which has induced an individual to give over the control of his personal comfort and safety to its care assumes a special duty to protect him from injury, particularly from its own employees. [Dickson v. Waldron, 135 Ind. 507 , 34 N.E. 506 (Ind. 1893).].... | 1 | 2017–2017 |
National Serv-All, Inc. v. Indiana Department of State Revenue
green
1 sentence2000It claims that this classification is arbitrary because “a carrier can claim the Public Transportation Exemption if the customer who compensates the carrier for transportation owns the property during or immediately after it is transported, but not if the customer owns the property immediately before it is transported.” Id. (original emphasis). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Lola Rabon v. Guardsmark, Inc.
green
2 sentences1989David cited Rabon v. Guardsmark, Inc., 571 F.2d 1277 (4th Cir.1978), for its discussion of non-delegable duties and the common carrier exception to the doctrine of respondeat superior. 1989The Court stated that it "lack[ed] a reasoned basis on which to conclude that the South Carolina Supreme Court would be persuaded to extend [the common carrier exception] to private security agencies." Id. at 1281 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.