appearance hearing in Kansas

2019We have previously held: "Certainly, the lack of an appearance at a hearing before this court qualifies as an additional aggravator." In re Barker , 302 Kan. 156 , 163, 351 P.3d 1256 (2015) ; see Kansas Supreme Court Rule 212(d) (respondent shall appear in person in disciplinary proceedings before the Supreme Court).

2019We have previously held: "Certainly, the lack of an appearance at a hearing before this court qualifies as an additional aggravator." In re Barker , 302 Kan. 156 , 163, 351 P.3d 1256 (2015) ; see Kansas Supreme Court Rule 212(d) (respondent shall appear in person in disciplinary proceedings before the Supreme Court).

2015“Certainly, the lack of an appearance at a hearing before this court qualifies as an additional aggravator.” In re Barker, 302 Kan. 156, 163 , 351 P.3d 1256, 1261 (2015); see In re Batt, 296 Kan. 395 , 294 P.3d 241 (2013).

2015“Certainly, the lack of an appearance at a hearing before this court qualifies as an additional aggravator.” In re Barker, 302 Kan. 156, 163 , 351 P.3d 1256, 1261 (2015); see In re Batt, 296 Kan. 395 , 294 P.3d 241 (2013).

2011See, e.g., Harrell v. Israel, 672 F.2d 632, 635 (7th Cir.1982) ("Although the shackling of defense witnesses may be less prejudicial to the accused because it does not directly affect the presumption of innocence, . . . nevertheless it may harm his defense by detracting from his witness' credibility."); People v. Froehlig, 1 Cal.App.4th 260, 264 , 1 Cal.Rptr.2d 858 (1991) ("The appearance of a defense witness attired in prison clothes does not, of course, adversely affect the presumption of innocence or carry with it the inference that the defendant is a person disposed to commit crimes. . . .

2011See, e.g., Harrell v. Israel, 672 F.2d 632, 635 (7th Cir. 1982) (“Although the shackling of defense witnesses may be less prejudicial to the accused because it does not directly affect the presumption of innocence, . . . nevertheless it may harm his defense by detracting from his witness’ credibility.”); People v. Froehlig, 1 Cal. App. 4th 260, 264 , 1 Cal. Rptr. 2d 858 (1991) (“The appearance of a defense witness attired in prison clothes does not, of course, adversely affect the presumption of innocence or cariy with it the inference that the defendant is a person disposed to commit crimes.

2011The credibility of a defense witness observed by the jury in prison attire may be suspect, but the prejudicial impact upon the defense is considered `less consequential.'"); Commonwealth v. Brown, 364 Mass. 471, 475 , 305 N.E.2d 830 (1974) ("The shackling of a witness . . . may influence a jury's judgment of credibility and further hurt the defendant in so far as the witness is conceived to be associated with him."); Hightower v. State, 123 Nev. 55, 58 , 154 P.3d 639 (2007) ("[R]equiring an incarcerated defense witness to appear in prison clothing may prejudice the accused by undermining the w

2011The credibility of a defense witness observed by the jury in prison attire may be suspect, but the prejudicial impact upon the defense is considered `less consequential.'"); Commonwealth v. Brown, 364 Mass. 471, 475 , 305 N.E.2d 830 (1974) ("The shackling of a witness . . . may influence a jury's judgment of credibility and further hurt the defendant in so far as the witness is conceived to be associated with him."); Hightower v. State, 123 Nev. 55, 58 , 154 P.3d 639 (2007) ("[R]equiring an incarcerated defense witness to appear in prison clothing may prejudice the accused by undermining the w

2011The credibility of a defense witness observed by the jury in prison attire may be suspect, but the prejudicial impact upon the defense is considered `less consequential.'"); Commonwealth v. Brown, 364 Mass. 471, 475 , 305 N.E.2d 830 (1974) ("The shackling of a witness . . . may influence a jury's judgment of credibility and further hurt the defendant in so far as the witness is conceived to be associated with him."); Hightower v. State, 123 Nev. 55, 58 , 154 P.3d 639 (2007) ("[R]equiring an incarcerated defense witness to appear in prison clothing may prejudice the accused by undermining the w

2011The credibility of a defense witness observed by the jury in prison attire may be suspect, but the prejudicial impact upon the defense is considered `less consequential.'"); Commonwealth v. Brown, 364 Mass. 471, 475 , 305 N.E.2d 830 (1974) ("The shackling of a witness . . . may influence a jury's judgment of credibility and further hurt the defendant in so far as the witness is conceived to be associated with him."); Hightower v. State, 123 Nev. 55, 58 , 154 P.3d 639 (2007) ("[R]equiring an incarcerated defense witness to appear in prison clothing may prejudice the accused by undermining the w

2011The credibility of a defense witness observed by the jury in prison attire may be suspect, but the prejudicial impact upon the defense is considered `less consequential.'"); Commonwealth v. Brown, 364 Mass. 471, 475 , 305 N.E.2d 830 (1974) ("The shackling of a witness . . . may influence a jury's judgment of credibility and further hurt the defendant in so far as the witness is conceived to be associated with him."); Hightower v. State, 123 Nev. 55, 58 , 154 P.3d 639 (2007) ("[R]equiring an incarcerated defense witness to appear in prison clothing may prejudice the accused by undermining the w

2011The credibility of a defense witness observed by the jury in prison attire may be suspect, but the prejudicial impact upon the defense is considered `less consequential.'"); Commonwealth v. Brown, 364 Mass. 471, 475 , 305 N.E.2d 830 (1974) ("The shackling of a witness . . . may influence a jury's judgment of credibility and further hurt the defendant in so far as the witness is conceived to be associated with him."); Hightower v. State, 123 Nev. 55, 58 , 154 P.3d 639 (2007) ("[R]equiring an incarcerated defense witness to appear in prison clothing may prejudice the accused by undermining the w