Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1902–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Allen v. Stategreen1 sentence2023Even if there were, the appropriate remedy would be suppression of the statements made during that period, not dismissal of the indictment.”); United States v. Carruthers, 458 F. App’x 811, 818 (11th Cir. 2012) (per curiam) (stating the “only remedy” the court has recognized for delay “is the suppression of evidence obtained as a result of the violation”); United States v. Colburn, 401 F. App’x 706, 708 (3d Cir. 2010) (stating dismissal of the indictment is not 12 a remedy for unnecessary delay); Allen v. State, 760 S.W.2d 69, 70 (Ark. 1988) (stating the rule requires an appearance but a viola | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Roger Carruthersgreen1 sentence2023Even if there were, the appropriate remedy would be suppression of the statements made during that period, not dismissal of the indictment.”); United States v. Carruthers, 458 F. App’x 811, 818 (11th Cir. 2012) (per curiam) (stating the “only remedy” the court has recognized for delay “is the suppression of evidence obtained as a result of the violation”); United States v. Colburn, 401 F. App’x 706, 708 (3d Cir. 2010) (stating dismissal of the indictment is not 12 a remedy for unnecessary delay); Allen v. State, 760 S.W.2d 69, 70 (Ark. 1988) (stating the rule requires an appearance but a viola | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Ray Colburngreen1 sentence2023Even if there were, the appropriate remedy would be suppression of the statements made during that period, not dismissal of the indictment.”); United States v. Carruthers, 458 F. App’x 811, 818 (11th Cir. 2012) (per curiam) (stating the “only remedy” the court has recognized for delay “is the suppression of evidence obtained as a result of the violation”); United States v. Colburn, 401 F. App’x 706, 708 (3d Cir. 2010) (stating dismissal of the indictment is not 12 a remedy for unnecessary delay); Allen v. State, 760 S.W.2d 69, 70 (Ark. 1988) (stating the rule requires an appearance but a viola | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Peritogreen1 sentence2023Even if there were, the appropriate remedy would be suppression of the statements made during that period, not dismissal of the indictment.”); United States v. Carruthers, 458 F. App’x 811, 818 (11th Cir. 2012) (per curiam) (stating the “only remedy” the court has recognized for delay “is the suppression of evidence obtained as a result of the violation”); United States v. Colburn, 401 F. App’x 706, 708 (3d Cir. 2010) (stating dismissal of the indictment is not 12 a remedy for unnecessary delay); Allen v. State, 760 S.W.2d 69, 70 (Ark. 1988) (stating the rule requires an appearance but a viola | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bolinske, Sr.green1 sentence2023However, . . . there is no basis for dismissing the indictments.”); State v. Bolinske, 969 N.W.2d 450, 456 (N.D. 2022) (“[D]etention in violation of a statutory right to bail ordinarily is not grounds for dismissing a complaint or voiding a subsequent conviction.”). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Watsongreen1 sentence1908See Smith v. Watson, 28 Iowa, 218 ; Bank v. Stone, 122 Iowa, 558 ; Goodrich v. Conrad, 24 Iowa, 254 ; Wile v. Wright, 32 Iowa, 451 ; McCrary v. Deming, 38 Iowa, 527 . 7‘ mrat ofitatei ment' The finding that there was such an appearance claim, as to render the question of service of original notice immaterial makes it unnecessary to further discuss appellant’s repeated contention that the amended claim is upon a new and different cause of action; but we think it proper, in this connection, to say that the allowance of an amendment, the purpose of which is to avoid the effect of the statute of l | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Corn Exchange Bank v. Applegate
green
2 sentences1957Kilmer v. Gallaher, 116 Iowa 666, 669 , 88 N.W. 959 ; Rankin v. City of Chariton, 160 Iowa 265, 274 , 139 N.W. 560 , 141 N.W. 424 ; Corn Exchange Bank v. Applegate, 97 Iowa 67, 70 , 65 N.W. 1007 . 1957Kilmer v. Gallaher, 116 Iowa 666, 669 , 88 N.W. 959 ; Rankin v. City of Chariton, 160 Iowa 265, 274 , 139 N.W. 560 , 141 N.W. 424 ; Corn Exchange Bank v. Applegate, 97 Iowa 67, 70 , 65 N.W. 1007 . | 2 | 1902–1957 |
State v. Dowell
green
1 sentence1980This case is therefore governed by our holding in State v. Dowell, 297 N.W.2d 93 (Iowa 1980), filed separately this date, in which we held that an alleged parole violator does not have a right to have the proceedings against him dismissed with prejudice for unnecessary delay in bringing him before a magistrate for an initial appearance in violation of section 908.2. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Doyle v. Willcockson
neutral
1 sentence1965As bearing on the effect of an appearance or waiver after a judgment held void see Doyle v. Willcockson, 184 Iowa 757, 767 , 169 N.W. 241 . | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Kilmer v. Gallaher
green
2 sentences1957Kilmer v. Gallaher, 116 Iowa 666, 669 , 88 N.W. 959 ; Rankin v. City of Chariton, 160 Iowa 265, 274 , 139 N.W. 560 , 141 N.W. 424 ; Corn Exchange Bank v. Applegate, 97 Iowa 67, 70 , 65 N.W. 1007 . 1957Kilmer v. Gallaher, 116 Iowa 666, 669 , 88 N.W. 959 ; Rankin v. City of Chariton, 160 Iowa 265, 274 , 139 N.W. 560 , 141 N.W. 424 ; Corn Exchange Bank v. Applegate, 97 Iowa 67, 70 , 65 N.W. 1007 . | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Cozine v. Moore
neutral
1 sentence1957Kilmer v. Gallaher, 116 Iowa 666, 669 , 88 N.W. 959 ; Rankin v. City of Chariton, 160 Iowa 265, 274 , 139 N.W. 560 , 141 N.W. 424 ; Corn Exchange Bank v. Applegate, 97 Iowa 67, 70 , 65 N.W. 1007 . | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Rankin v. City of Chariton
neutral
1 sentence1957Kilmer v. Gallaher, 116 Iowa 666, 669 , 88 N.W. 959 ; Rankin v. City of Chariton, 160 Iowa 265, 274 , 139 N.W. 560 , 141 N.W. 424 ; Corn Exchange Bank v. Applegate, 97 Iowa 67, 70 , 65 N.W. 1007 . | 1 | 1957–1957 |
Beard v. Simmons
neutral
1 sentence1908Myers v. Kirt, 68 Iowa, 124 ; Lottman v. Barnett, 62 Mo. 159 ; Beard v. Simmons, 9 Ga. 4 ; Schieffelin v. Whipple, 10 Wis. 81 ; R. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Lottman v. Barnett
green
1 sentence1908Myers v. Kirt, 68 Iowa, 124 ; Lottman v. Barnett, 62 Mo. 159 ; Beard v. Simmons, 9 Ga. 4 ; Schieffelin v. Whipple, 10 Wis. 81 ; R. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Schieffelin v. Whipple
neutral
1 sentence1908Myers v. Kirt, 68 Iowa, 124 ; Lottman v. Barnett, 62 Mo. 159 ; Beard v. Simmons, 9 Ga. 4 ; Schieffelin v. Whipple, 10 Wis. 81 ; R. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Goodrich v. Conrad
green
1 sentence1908See Smith v. Watson, 28 Iowa, 218 ; Bank v. Stone, 122 Iowa, 558 ; Goodrich v. Conrad, 24 Iowa, 254 ; Wile v. Wright, 32 Iowa, 451 ; McCrary v. Deming, 38 Iowa, 527 . 7‘ mrat ofitatei ment' The finding that there was such an appearance claim, as to render the question of service of original notice immaterial makes it unnecessary to further discuss appellant’s repeated contention that the amended claim is upon a new and different cause of action; but we think it proper, in this connection, to say that the allowance of an amendment, the purpose of which is to avoid the effect of the statute of l | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Wile v. Wright
green
1 sentence1908See Smith v. Watson, 28 Iowa, 218 ; Bank v. Stone, 122 Iowa, 558 ; Goodrich v. Conrad, 24 Iowa, 254 ; Wile v. Wright, 32 Iowa, 451 ; McCrary v. Deming, 38 Iowa, 527 . 7‘ mrat ofitatei ment' The finding that there was such an appearance claim, as to render the question of service of original notice immaterial makes it unnecessary to further discuss appellant’s repeated contention that the amended claim is upon a new and different cause of action; but we think it proper, in this connection, to say that the allowance of an amendment, the purpose of which is to avoid the effect of the statute of l | 1 | 1908–1908 |
McCrary v. Deming
neutral
1 sentence1908See Smith v. Watson, 28 Iowa, 218 ; Bank v. Stone, 122 Iowa, 558 ; Goodrich v. Conrad, 24 Iowa, 254 ; Wile v. Wright, 32 Iowa, 451 ; McCrary v. Deming, 38 Iowa, 527 . 7‘ mrat ofitatei ment' The finding that there was such an appearance claim, as to render the question of service of original notice immaterial makes it unnecessary to further discuss appellant’s repeated contention that the amended claim is upon a new and different cause of action; but we think it proper, in this connection, to say that the allowance of an amendment, the purpose of which is to avoid the effect of the statute of l | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Myers v. Kirt
green
1 sentence1908Myers v. Kirt, 68 Iowa, 124 ; Lottman v. Barnett, 62 Mo. 159 ; Beard v. Simmons, 9 Ga. 4 ; Schieffelin v. Whipple, 10 Wis. 81 ; R. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
First National Bank v. Stone
green
1 sentence1908See Smith v. Watson, 28 Iowa, 218 ; Bank v. Stone, 122 Iowa, 558 ; Goodrich v. Conrad, 24 Iowa, 254 ; Wile v. Wright, 32 Iowa, 451 ; McCrary v. Deming, 38 Iowa, 527 . 7‘ mrat ofitatei ment' The finding that there was such an appearance claim, as to render the question of service of original notice immaterial makes it unnecessary to further discuss appellant’s repeated contention that the amended claim is upon a new and different cause of action; but we think it proper, in this connection, to say that the allowance of an amendment, the purpose of which is to avoid the effect of the statute of l | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Childs v. Limback
neutral
1 sentence1902Corn Exchange Bank v. Applegate, 97 Iowa, 67 ; Childs v. Limback, 30 Iowa, 398 , and cases therein cited. 4 III. | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.