Fourth Amendment reasonableness test (North Carolina) · Go Syfert
← North Carolina issues

Fourth Amendment reasonableness test in North Carolina

8 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2021 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Gradygreen
nc · 2019 · cited in 6 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2020–2021
2 sentences

2021The Fourth Amendment reasonableness test requires balancing significant competing interests: the State’s interest in protecting children and others from sexual abuse and a convicted sex offender’s right to privacy from government monitoring. ¶2 Upon remand from the Supreme Court’s Grady I order, this Court held the SBM program to be unconstitutional as applied to the narrow category of individuals “who are subject to mandatory lifetime SBM based solely on their status as a statutorily defined ‘recidivist’ who have completed their prison sentences and are no longer supervised by the State throu

2021The Fourth Amendment reasonableness test requires balancing significant competing interests: the State’s interest in protecting children and others from sexual abuse and a convicted sex offender’s right to privacy from government monitoring. ¶2 Upon remand from the Supreme Court’s Grady I order, this Court held the SBM program to be unconstitutional as applied to the narrow category of individuals “who are subject to mandatory lifetime SBM based solely on their status as a statutorily defined ‘recidivist’ who have completed their prison sentences and are no longer supervised by the State throu

46
Vernonia School District 47J v. Actongreen
scotus · 1995 · cited in 3 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2019–2021
2 sentences

2021Id. at 661–62, 665, 115 S. Ct. at 2395, 2397 . ¶ 17 In Grady III the trial court imposed SBM on the defendant solely due to his status as a recidivist even though he had completed his prison sentence and was no longer subject to post-release supervision at the time of the SBM order.

2021Id. at 661–62, 665, 115 S. Ct. at 2395, 2397 . ¶ 17 In Grady III the trial court imposed SBM on the defendant solely due to his status as a recidivist even though he had completed his prison sentence and was no longer subject to post-release supervision at the time of the SBM order.

33
Samson v. Californiagreen
scotus · 2006 · cited in 2 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2021–2021
2 sentences

2021Grady I, 575 U.S. at 310 , 135 S. Ct. at 1371 (citing Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843, 857 , 126 S. Ct. 2193, 2202 (2006) (suspicionless search of parolee was reasonable); Vernonia Sch.

2021Grady I, 575 U.S. at 310 , 135 S. Ct. at 1371 (citing Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843, 857 , 126 S. Ct. 2193, 2202 (2006) (suspicionless search of parolee was reasonable); Vernonia Sch.

22
Terry v. Ohiogreen
scotus · 1968 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008See, e.g., Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20-21 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1879-80 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , 905-06 & n. 18 (1968).

2008See, e.g., Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20-21 , 88 S.Ct. 1868, 1879-80 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 , 905-06 & n. 18 (1968).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Sampson v. United States green
scotus · 2006
2 sentences

2021Grady I, 575 U.S. at 310 , 135 S. Ct. at 1371 (citing Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843, 857 , 126 S. Ct. 2193, 2202 (2006) (suspicionless search of parolee was reasonable); Vernonia Sch.

2021Grady I, 575 U.S. at 310 , 135 S. Ct. at 1371 (citing Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843, 857 , 126 S. Ct. 2193, 2202 (2006) (suspicionless search of parolee was reasonable); Vernonia Sch.

22021–2021
Grady v. North Carolina green
scotus · 2015
2 sentences

2021Grady I, 575 U.S. at 310 , 135 S. Ct. at 1371 (citing Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843, 857 , 126 S. Ct. 2193, 2202 (2006) (suspicionless search of parolee was reasonable); Vernonia Sch.

2021Grady I, 575 U.S. at 310 , 135 S. Ct. at 1371 (citing Samson v. California, 547 U.S. 843, 857 , 126 S. Ct. 2193, 2202 (2006) (suspicionless search of parolee was reasonable); Vernonia Sch.

22021–2021

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.43 (7) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.40 (5) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.40A (5) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.6 (5) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1368.4 (5) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 7A-30 (5) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-202.3 (3) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.10 (3) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.23 (3) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 14-208.42 (3) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-14 (3) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 93A-6 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WI 9 (1992–2015) TX 9 (2002–2021) CA 8 (1997–2024) MD 8 (2002–2025) NC 8 (2008–2021) IL 5 (1980–2023) IN 4 (2002–2015) WA 4 (1988–2020) FL 4 (1989–2007) MN 4 (1998–2017) CO 4 (1993–2016) OH 3 (1991–2002) CT 3 (2004–2010) MI 3 (1997–2016) LA 3 (2001–2008) NM 2 (2004–2007) DC 2 (2019–2022) AR 2 (2001–2017) PA 2 (1982–2018) IA 2 (2001–2012) WY 2 (2005–2005) ME 2 (1998–2001)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check