Fourth Amendment reasonableness standard (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

Fourth Amendment reasonableness standard in Illinois

5 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. McCavittgreen
ill · 2021 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023See People v. McCavitt, 2021 IL 125550, ¶¶ 106-08 (explaining that “the fourth amendment requires the government to complete its review of digital data within a reasonable period of time”).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
People v. Hamilton green
ill · 1979
2 sentences

1984People v. Boyles (1980), 82 Ill. 2d 128, 135 , 411 N.E.2d 1346 ; People v. Hamilton (1979), 74 Ill. 2d 457, 465 , 386 N.E.2d 53 ; see generally, 2 W.

1984People v. Boyles (1980), 82 Ill. 2d 128, 135 , 411 N.E.2d 1346 ; People v. Hamilton (1979), 74 Ill. 2d 457, 465 , 386 N.E.2d 53 ; see generally, 2 W.

31980–1984
People v. Bayles green
ill · 1980
2 sentences

1984People v. Boyles (1980), 82 Ill. 2d 128, 135 , 411 N.E.2d 1346 ; People v. Hamilton (1979), 74 Ill. 2d 457, 465 , 386 N.E.2d 53 ; see generally, 2 W.

1984People v. Boyles (1980), 82 Ill. 2d 128, 135 , 411 N.E.2d 1346 ; People v. Hamilton (1979), 74 Ill. 2d 457, 465 , 386 N.E.2d 53 ; see generally, 2 W.

21982–1984
South Dakota v. Opperman green
scotus · 1976
1 sentence

1982Ed. 2d 1000 , 96 S. Ct. 3092 ), it nonetheless invades legitimate expectations of privacy and that intrusion is tested for its constitutionality by an application of the fourth amendment reasonableness standard.

11982–1982
People v. Clark green
ill · 1976
1 sentence

1980People v. Hamilton (1979), 74 Ill. 2d 457, 465 ; People v. Clark (1976), 65 Ill. 2d 169, 174 ; People v. Smith. (1969), 44 Illl. 2d 82, 88.

11980–1980

Where else courts name it

WI 9 (1992–2015) TX 9 (2002–2021) CA 8 (1997–2024) MD 8 (2002–2025) NC 8 (2008–2021) IL 5 (1980–2023) IN 4 (2002–2015) WA 4 (1988–2020) FL 4 (1989–2007) MN 4 (1998–2017) CO 4 (1993–2016) OH 3 (1991–2002) CT 3 (2004–2010) MI 3 (1997–2016) LA 3 (2001–2008) NM 2 (2004–2007) DC 2 (2019–2022) AR 2 (2001–2017) PA 2 (1982–2018) IA 2 (2001–2012) WY 2 (2005–2005) ME 2 (1998–2001)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check