Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Byrd v. Alexandergreen2 sentences2008See, e.g., White, 175 N.C.App. at 143 , 622 S.E.2d at 723 (dismissing appeal when record was not filed until 50 days after appellee served amendments and objections to proposed record); Byrd v. Alexander, 32 N.C.App. 782, 783 , 233 S.E.2d 654, 655 (1977) (dismissing appeal when record not timely filed and no extension sought). 2008See, e.g., White, 175 N.C.App. at 143 , 622 S.E.2d at 723 (dismissing appeal when record was not filed until 50 days after appellee served amendments and objections to proposed record); Byrd v. Alexander, 32 N.C.App. 782, 783 , 233 S.E.2d 654, 655 (1977) (dismissing appeal when record not timely filed and no extension sought). | 1 | 1 |
White v. Carvergreen2 sentences2008See, e.g., White, 175 N.C.App. at 143 , 622 S.E.2d at 723 (dismissing appeal when record was not filed until 50 days after appellee served amendments and objections to proposed record); Byrd v. Alexander, 32 N.C.App. 782, 783 , 233 S.E.2d 654, 655 (1977) (dismissing appeal when record not timely filed and no extension sought). 2008See, e.g., White, 175 N.C.App. at 143 , 622 S.E.2d at 723 (dismissing appeal when record was not filed until 50 days after appellee served amendments and objections to proposed record); Byrd v. Alexander, 32 N.C.App. 782, 783 , 233 S.E.2d 654, 655 (1977) (dismissing appeal when record not timely filed and no extension sought). | 1 | 1 |
McLeod v. Faustgreen1 sentence2006App. 370, 371 , 374 S.E.2d 417, 417 (1988) (dismissing appeal when the appellant filed a record on appeal with the Court of Appeals without giving the appellee an opportunity to object to it). *689 Failure to properly serve a proposed record on appeal is not a mere technical violation. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Curmongreen2 sentences1987See State v. Curmon, 295 N.C. 453, 457 , 245 S.E. 2d 503, 505 (1978) (“A mere technical error will not entitle a defendant to a new trial; rather, it is necessary that the error be material and prejudicial.”). 1987See State v. Curmon, 295 N.C. 453, 457 , 245 S.E. 2d 503, 505 (1978) (“A mere technical error will not entitle a defendant to a new trial; rather, it is necessary that the error be material and prejudicial.”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Alexandergreen2 sentences1978See State v. Alexander, 279 N.C. 527 , 184 S.E. 2d 274 (1971); State v. Paige, 272 N.C. 417 , 158 S.E. 2d 522 (1967). 1978See State v. Alexander, 279 N.C. 527 , 184 S.E. 2d 274 (1971); State v. Paige, 272 N.C. 417 , 158 S.E. 2d 522 (1967). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Garcia
green
2 sentences2004Garcia, 358 N.C. at 410 , 597 S.E.2d at 745 . 2004Garcia, 358 N.C. at 410 , 597 S.E.2d at 745 . | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Richardson v. Union County Board of Adjustment
green
1 sentence2009It is incumbent on [petitioners] to show [they were] prejudiced." Richardson v. Union County Bd. of Adjustment, 136 N.C. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Hill
green
2 sentences1987In regard to this second issue, the State contends that the district court erred in dismissing the charge against defendant because it applied the per se prejudice rule formulated in State v. Hill, 277 N.C. 547 , 178 S.E. 2d 462 (1971). 1987In regard to this second issue, the State contends that the district court erred in dismissing the charge against defendant because it applied the per se prejudice rule formulated in State v. Hill, 277 N.C. 547 , 178 S.E. 2d 462 (1971). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Paige
green
2 sentences1978See State v. Alexander, 279 N.C. 527 , 184 S.E. 2d 274 (1971); State v. Paige, 272 N.C. 417 , 158 S.E. 2d 522 (1967). 1978See State v. Alexander, 279 N.C. 527 , 184 S.E. 2d 274 (1971); State v. Paige, 272 N.C. 417 , 158 S.E. 2d 522 (1967). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Bass
green
2 sentences1974State v. Bass, 280 N.C. 435 , 186 S.E. 2d 384 (1972); State v. Crump, 280 N.C. 491 , 186 S.E. 2d 369 (1972). 1974State v. Bass, 280 N.C. 435 , 186 S.E. 2d 384 (1972); State v. Crump, 280 N.C. 491 , 186 S.E. 2d 369 (1972). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
State v. Crump
neutral
2 sentences1974State v. Bass, 280 N.C. 435 , 186 S.E. 2d 384 (1972); State v. Crump, 280 N.C. 491 , 186 S.E. 2d 369 (1972). 1974State v. Bass, 280 N.C. 435 , 186 S.E. 2d 384 (1972); State v. Crump, 280 N.C. 491 , 186 S.E. 2d 369 (1972). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.