8 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Saltsman v. Corazogreen2 sentences2022The rescue doctrine “has long been a part of our State’s social fabric.” Saltsman v. Corazo, 317 N.J. 2021"The rescue doctrine has received general recognition in New Jersey and 'has long been a part of our State's social fabric.'" Saltsman v. Corazo, 317 N.J. | 2 | 4 |
Estate of Newton ex rel. Newton v. McNewgreen2 sentences2022See, e.g., Estate of Newton v. McNew, 698 P.2d 835, 837 (Colo. App. 1984) (holding that the doctrine is applicable to property after finding that a 10 “majority of states apply” the doctrine to “one who tries to rescue the property of another”); Neff v. Woodmen of the World Life Ins. 2021Newton v. McNew, 698 P.2d 835, 837 (Colo. App. 1984). | 2 | 2 |
Wagner v. International Railway Co.green2 sentences2022Co., 133 N.E. 437, 437-38 (N.Y. 1921). 2022The 6 state that leaves an opening in a bridge is liable to the child that falls into the stream, but liable also to the parent who plunges to its aid. [ 133 N.E. 437, 437-38 (N.Y. 1921).] The rescue doctrine established in Wagner was originally limited to situations “where three persons are involved, i.e., one party by his culpable act has placed another person in a position of imminent peril which invites a third person, the rescuing plaintiff, to come to his aid.” See Provenzo v. Sam, 244 N.E.2d 26, 28 (N.Y. 1968). | 2 | 2 |
Ruiz v. Merogreen2 sentences2022Super. 244, 252 (App. Div. 1997). 7 The first time this Court directly considered the rescue doctrine was in Ruiz v. Mero, a case in which we affirmed the Appellate Division’s opinion, which held that the Legislature abrogated the “firefighters’ rule”3 when it adopted N.J.S.A. 2A:62A-21. 189 N.J. 525, 527 (2007). 2022In Ruiz, a unanimous Court upheld the right of a police officer to rely on the rescue doctrine to sue “a commercial landowner for injuries he suffered when quelling a disturbance at the owner’s bar.” Ibid. | 2 | 2 |
Estate of Desir v. Vertusgreen2 sentences2022In Estate of Desir v. Vertus, we reviewed the applicability of the rescue doctrine in the context of a “tragic shooting death of an individual by a criminal fleeing from a business.” 214 N.J. 303, 308 (2013). 2021Some of that authority is persuasive and raises a legitimate question why the rescue doctrine should be A-3431-19 8 limited to the rescue of another human being, either the victim of another's negligence or, in very limited "particular circumstances," the one being rescued "who completely or partially created the peril that invited the rescue." Desir, 214 N.J. at 321 . | 1 | 2 |
Provenzo v. Samgreen2 sentences2022The 6 state that leaves an opening in a bridge is liable to the child that falls into the stream, but liable also to the parent who plunges to its aid. [ 133 N.E. 437, 437-38 (N.Y. 1921).] The rescue doctrine established in Wagner was originally limited to situations “where three persons are involved, i.e., one party by his culpable act has placed another person in a position of imminent peril which invites a third person, the rescuing plaintiff, to come to his aid.” See Provenzo v. Sam, 244 N.E.2d 26, 28 (N.Y. 1968). 2022New York courts later expanded the rescue doctrine “to encompass a two-party situation where the culpable party has placed himself in a perilous position which invites rescue.” Ibid. | 1 | 2 |
Hill v. Yaskingreen2 sentences2013In crafting this new duty, the appellate panel strove to create a generally applicable rule, and did so by blending concepts of premises liability and the rescue doctrine, gleaned from our decisions in Olivo, supra, 186 N.J. at 402-04 , 895 A.2d 1143 , and Hill, supra, 75 N.J. at 143, 147 , 380 A.2d 1107 , together with similar concepts derived from federal ease law, see Wood, supra, 879 F.2d at 591 ; Bowers, supra, 686 F.2d at 618 . 2013In crafting this new duty, the appellate panel strove to create a generally applicable rule, and did so by blending concepts of premises liability and the rescue doctrine, gleaned from our decisions in Olivo, supra, 186 N.J. at 402-04 , 895 A.2d 1143 , and Hill, supra, 75 N.J. at 143, 147 , 380 A.2d 1107 , together with similar concepts derived from federal ease law, see Wood, supra, 879 F.2d at 591 ; Bowers, supra, 686 F.2d at 618 . | 1 | 2 |
Jones v. Court of Common Pleas of Essex Countygreen2 sentences1998The rescue doctrine has received general recognition in New Jersey and "has long been a part of our State's social fabric." Burns v. Market Transition Facility, 281 N.J.Super. 304, 310 , 657 A. 2d 472 (App.Div. 1995); see also Layden v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 129 N.J.L. 54, 58 , 28 A. 2d 96 (E. & A.1942); Eyrich for Eyrich v. Dam, 193 N.J.Super. 244, 256 , 473 A. 2d 539 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 97 N.J. 583 , 483 A. 2d 127 (1984); Harrison v. Middlesex Water Co., 158 N.J.Super. 368, 376 , 386 A. 2d 405 (App. Div.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 80 N.J. 391 , 403 A. 2d 910 (1979); Cafone v 1995Layden v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc., 129 N.J.L. 54, 58 , 28 A. 2d 96 (E & A 1942). | 1 | 2 |
Layden v. Goodyear Tire Rubber Co., Inc.green2 sentences1998The rescue doctrine has received general recognition in New Jersey and "has long been a part of our State's social fabric." Burns v. Market Transition Facility, 281 N.J.Super. 304, 310 , 657 A. 2d 472 (App.Div. 1995); see also Layden v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 129 N.J.L. 54, 58 , 28 A. 2d 96 (E. & A.1942); Eyrich for Eyrich v. Dam, 193 N.J.Super. 244, 256 , 473 A. 2d 539 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 97 N.J. 583 , 483 A. 2d 127 (1984); Harrison v. Middlesex Water Co., 158 N.J.Super. 368, 376 , 386 A. 2d 405 (App. Div.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 80 N.J. 391 , 403 A. 2d 910 (1979); Cafone v 1995Layden v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., Inc., 129 N.J.L. 54, 58 , 28 A. 2d 96 (E & A 1942). | 1 | 2 |
Welch v. Hesston Corp.green2 sentences2022For example, the Missouri Eastern District Court of Appeals held in Welch v. Hesston Corp. that, “[u]nlike a majority of other jurisdictions,” it has consistently declined to extend the rescue doctrine to include the protection of property. 540 S.W.2d 127, 129 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976). 2022For example, the Missouri Eastern District Court of Appeals held in Welch v. Hesston Corp. that, “[u]nlike a majority of other jurisdictions,” it has consistently declined to extend the rescue doctrine to include the protection of property. 540 S.W.2d 127, 129 (Mo. Ct. App. 1976). | 1 | 1 |
Estate of Naitil Desir v. Vertusgreen2 sentences2013It concluded instead that “one who has reason to believe that an intruder on his premises poses a danger to others owes a duty of reasonable care to a friend whom he brings to the danger by a request for assistance.” Ibid. 2013Id. at 315 , 13 A.3d 428 . | 1 | 1 |
People v. Swobodagreen2 sentences2002See People v. Swoboda, 190 Misc. 2d 214 , 737 N.Y.S. 2d 821, 827-28 (N.Y.CityCr.Ct.1999) (holding that where officer questioned unwarned defendants about the whereabouts of their baby, question was covered by rescue doctrine and not the public safety exception because there was a particular, identifiable life being endangered, creating 1) an urgent need, 2) the possibility of saving human *281 life, and 3) rescue was the primary motive of the officer). 2002See People v. Swoboda, 190 Misc. 2d 214 , 737 N.Y.S. 2d 821, 827-28 (N.Y.CityCr.Ct.1999) (holding that where officer questioned unwarned defendants about the whereabouts of their baby, question was covered by rescue doctrine and not the public safety exception because there was a particular, identifiable life being endangered, creating 1) an urgent need, 2) the possibility of saving human *281 life, and 3) rescue was the primary motive of the officer). | 1 | 1 |
Trainor v. Santanagreen2 sentences1983Accordingly, the rationale of the rescue doctrine has no bearing on the fireman's rule. [1] We said on this point in Hill : * * * Once we acknowledge conceptually the existence of a duty predicated on foreseeability of an increased hazard of theft and subsequent mishandling of an automobile, it should then become the jury's task to determine whether under the facts of this case that duty was violated by defendant [owner] and her conduct was a substantial causative factor in the plaintiff's injury. [ 75 N.J. at 147 ] This Court noted in the subsequent decision of Trainor v. Santana, 86 N.J. 403 1983Accordingly, the rationale of the rescue doctrine has no bearing on the fireman's rule. [1] We said on this point in Hill : * * * Once we acknowledge conceptually the existence of a duty predicated on foreseeability of an increased hazard of theft and subsequent mishandling of an automobile, it should then become the jury's task to determine whether under the facts of this case that duty was violated by defendant [owner] and her conduct was a substantial causative factor in the plaintiff's injury. [ 75 N.J. at 147 ] This Court noted in the subsequent decision of Trainor v. Santana, 86 N.J. 403 | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
green
2 sentences2013In crafting this new duty, the appellate panel strove to create a generally applicable rule, and did so by blending concepts of premises liability and the rescue doctrine, gleaned from our decisions in Olivo, supra, 186 N.J. at 402-04 , 895 A.2d 1143 , and Hill, supra, 75 N.J. at 143, 147 , 380 A.2d 1107 , together with similar concepts derived from federal ease law, see Wood, supra, 879 F.2d at 591 ; Bowers, supra, 686 F.2d at 618 . 2013In crafting this new duty, the appellate panel strove to create a generally applicable rule, and did so by blending concepts of premises liability and the rescue doctrine, gleaned from our decisions in Olivo, supra, 186 N.J. at 402-04 , 895 A.2d 1143 , and Hill, supra, 75 N.J. at 143, 147 , 380 A.2d 1107 , together with similar concepts derived from federal ease law, see Wood, supra, 879 F.2d at 591 ; Bowers, supra, 686 F.2d at 618 . | 2 | 2011–2013 |
Schmartz v. Harger
neutral
2 sentences2021We are persuaded that it is the proper rule to be applied here. [Ibid. (citing Prosser & Keeton at § 44; Schmartz v. Harger, 171 A.2d 89 (Ct. Sup. Ct. 1961)).] A-3431-19 10 Defendants do not concede that a majority of states have applied the rescue doctrine to the rescue of imperiled property, but only that a majority of those states which have actually confronted the issue have so decided. 2021We are persuaded that it is the proper rule to be applied here. [Ibid. (citing Prosser & Keeton at § 44; Schmartz v. Harger, 171 A.2d 89 (Ct. Sup. Ct. 1961)).] A-3431-19 10 Defendants do not concede that a majority of states have applied the rescue doctrine to the rescue of imperiled property, but only that a majority of those states which have actually confronted the issue have so decided. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Arvanitis v. Hios
green
2 sentences2013Estate of Desir, supra, 418 N.J.Super. at 317-18 , 13 A.3d 428 ; see Ruiz v. Mero, 189 N.J. 525, 528-29 , 917 A.2d 239 (2007) (explaining relationship of foreseeability of rescue to imposition of duty); Saltsman v. Corazo, 317 N.J.Super. 237, 247-48 , 721 A.2d 1000 (App.Div.1998) (imposing duty of care on one who negligently imperils himself and foreseeably invites rescue); Arvanitis v. Hios, 307 N.J.Super. 577, 580-81 , 705 A.2d 355 (App.Div.1998) (imposing duty on woman who summoned her unsuspecting nephew when her husband refused to take his medications which she knew created potential for 2013Estate of Desir, supra, 418 N.J.Super. at 317-18 , 13 A.3d 428 ; see Ruiz v. Mero, 189 N.J. 525, 528-29 , 917 A.2d 239 (2007) (explaining relationship of foreseeability of rescue to imposition of duty); Saltsman v. Corazo, 317 N.J.Super. 237, 247-48 , 721 A.2d 1000 (App.Div.1998) (imposing duty of care on one who negligently imperils himself and foreseeably invites rescue); Arvanitis v. Hios, 307 N.J.Super. 577, 580-81 , 705 A.2d 355 (App.Div.1998) (imposing duty on woman who summoned her unsuspecting nephew when her husband refused to take his medications which she knew created potential for | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Butler v. Jersey Coast News Co.
green
1 sentence2013Crais III, Annotation, Rescue Doctrine: Negligence and Contributory Negligence in Suit by Rescuer Against Rescued Person, 4 A.L.R.3A 558 (1965)), and not inconsistent with existing ease law in New Jersey, id. at 248, 721 A.2d 1000 (citing Butler v. Jersey Coast News Co., 109 N.J.L. 255, 257-58 , 160 A. 659 (E. & A.1932)). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Thomas L. Bowers, Administrator of the Estate of Marguerite Anne Bowers, Deceased v. Robert A. Devito, M.D.
green
2 sentences2013In crafting this new duty, the appellate panel strove to create a generally applicable rule, and did so by blending concepts of premises liability and the rescue doctrine, gleaned from our decisions in Olivo, supra, 186 N.J. at 402-04 , 895 A.2d 1143 , and Hill, supra, 75 N.J. at 143, 147 , 380 A.2d 1107 , together with similar concepts derived from federal ease law, see Wood, supra, 879 F.2d at 591 ; Bowers, supra, 686 F.2d at 618 . 2013In crafting this new duty, the appellate panel strove to create a generally applicable rule, and did so by blending concepts of premises liability and the rescue doctrine, gleaned from our decisions in Olivo, supra, 186 N.J. at 402-04 , 895 A.2d 1143 , and Hill, supra, 75 N.J. at 143, 147 , 380 A.2d 1107 , together with similar concepts derived from federal ease law, see Wood, supra, 879 F.2d at 591 ; Bowers, supra, 686 F.2d at 618 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Linda K. Wood v. Steven C. Ostrander Neil Maloney
green
2 sentences2013In crafting this new duty, the appellate panel strove to create a generally applicable rule, and did so by blending concepts of premises liability and the rescue doctrine, gleaned from our decisions in Olivo, supra, 186 N.J. at 402-04 , 895 A.2d 1143 , and Hill, supra, 75 N.J. at 143, 147 , 380 A.2d 1107 , together with similar concepts derived from federal ease law, see Wood, supra, 879 F.2d at 591 ; Bowers, supra, 686 F.2d at 618 . 2013In crafting this new duty, the appellate panel strove to create a generally applicable rule, and did so by blending concepts of premises liability and the rescue doctrine, gleaned from our decisions in Olivo, supra, 186 N.J. at 402-04 , 895 A.2d 1143 , and Hill, supra, 75 N.J. at 143, 147 , 380 A.2d 1107 , together with similar concepts derived from federal ease law, see Wood, supra, 879 F.2d at 591 ; Bowers, supra, 686 F.2d at 618 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Cafone v. Spiniello Construction Co.
neutral
1 sentence1998Co., 42 N.J.Super. 590, 602-03 , 127 A. 2d 441 (App.Div.1956), certif. denied, 23 N.J. 258 , 128 A. 2d 753 (1957); Tarnow v. Hudson & Manhattan R. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Eyrich for Eyrich v. Dam
green
2 sentences1998The rescue doctrine has received general recognition in New Jersey and "has long been a part of our State's social fabric." Burns v. Market Transition Facility, 281 N.J.Super. 304, 310 , 657 A. 2d 472 (App.Div. 1995); see also Layden v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 129 N.J.L. 54, 58 , 28 A. 2d 96 (E. & A.1942); Eyrich for Eyrich v. Dam, 193 N.J.Super. 244, 256 , 473 A. 2d 539 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 97 N.J. 583 , 483 A. 2d 127 (1984); Harrison v. Middlesex Water Co., 158 N.J.Super. 368, 376 , 386 A. 2d 405 (App. Div.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 80 N.J. 391 , 403 A. 2d 910 (1979); Cafone v 1998The rescue doctrine has received general recognition in New Jersey and "has long been a part of our State's social fabric." Burns v. Market Transition Facility, 281 N.J.Super. 304, 310 , 657 A. 2d 472 (App.Div. 1995); see also Layden v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 129 N.J.L. 54, 58 , 28 A. 2d 96 (E. & A.1942); Eyrich for Eyrich v. Dam, 193 N.J.Super. 244, 256 , 473 A. 2d 539 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 97 N.J. 583 , 483 A. 2d 127 (1984); Harrison v. Middlesex Water Co., 158 N.J.Super. 368, 376 , 386 A. 2d 405 (App. Div.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 80 N.J. 391 , 403 A. 2d 910 (1979); Cafone v | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Eyrich v. DAM AND EARL
green
2 sentences1998The rescue doctrine has received general recognition in New Jersey and "has long been a part of our State's social fabric." Burns v. Market Transition Facility, 281 N.J.Super. 304, 310 , 657 A. 2d 472 (App.Div. 1995); see also Layden v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 129 N.J.L. 54, 58 , 28 A. 2d 96 (E. & A.1942); Eyrich for Eyrich v. Dam, 193 N.J.Super. 244, 256 , 473 A. 2d 539 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 97 N.J. 583 , 483 A. 2d 127 (1984); Harrison v. Middlesex Water Co., 158 N.J.Super. 368, 376 , 386 A. 2d 405 (App. Div.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 80 N.J. 391 , 403 A. 2d 910 (1979); Cafone v 1998The rescue doctrine has received general recognition in New Jersey and "has long been a part of our State's social fabric." Burns v. Market Transition Facility, 281 N.J.Super. 304, 310 , 657 A. 2d 472 (App.Div. 1995); see also Layden v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 129 N.J.L. 54, 58 , 28 A. 2d 96 (E. & A.1942); Eyrich for Eyrich v. Dam, 193 N.J.Super. 244, 256 , 473 A. 2d 539 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 97 N.J. 583 , 483 A. 2d 127 (1984); Harrison v. Middlesex Water Co., 158 N.J.Super. 368, 376 , 386 A. 2d 405 (App. Div.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 80 N.J. 391 , 403 A. 2d 910 (1979); Cafone v | 1 | 1998–1998 |
In re the Estate of Dickerson
neutral
1 sentence1998Co., 42 N.J.Super. 590, 602-03 , 127 A. 2d 441 (App.Div.1956), certif. denied, 23 N.J. 258 , 128 A. 2d 753 (1957); Tarnow v. Hudson & Manhattan R. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Burns v. Market Transition Fac.
green
2 sentences1998The rescue doctrine has received general recognition in New Jersey and "has long been a part of our State's social fabric." Burns v. Market Transition Facility, 281 N.J.Super. 304, 310 , 657 A. 2d 472 (App.Div. 1995); see also Layden v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 129 N.J.L. 54, 58 , 28 A. 2d 96 (E. & A.1942); Eyrich for Eyrich v. Dam, 193 N.J.Super. 244, 256 , 473 A. 2d 539 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 97 N.J. 583 , 483 A. 2d 127 (1984); Harrison v. Middlesex Water Co., 158 N.J.Super. 368, 376 , 386 A. 2d 405 (App. Div.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 80 N.J. 391 , 403 A. 2d 910 (1979); Cafone v 1998The rescue doctrine has received general recognition in New Jersey and "has long been a part of our State's social fabric." Burns v. Market Transition Facility, 281 N.J.Super. 304, 310 , 657 A. 2d 472 (App.Div. 1995); see also Layden v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 129 N.J.L. 54, 58 , 28 A. 2d 96 (E. & A.1942); Eyrich for Eyrich v. Dam, 193 N.J.Super. 244, 256 , 473 A. 2d 539 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 97 N.J. 583 , 483 A. 2d 127 (1984); Harrison v. Middlesex Water Co., 158 N.J.Super. 368, 376 , 386 A. 2d 405 (App. Div.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 80 N.J. 391 , 403 A. 2d 910 (1979); Cafone v | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Cafone v. Spiniello Construction Co.
green
2 sentences1998Co., 42 N.J.Super. 590, 602-03 , 127 A. 2d 441 (App.Div.1956), certif. denied, 23 N.J. 258 , 128 A. 2d 753 (1957); Tarnow v. Hudson & Manhattan R. 1998Co., 42 N.J.Super. 590, 602-03 , 127 A. 2d 441 (App.Div.1956), certif. denied, 23 N.J. 258 , 128 A. 2d 753 (1957); Tarnow v. Hudson & Manhattan R. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Harrison v. Middlesex Water Company
green
2 sentences1998The rescue doctrine has received general recognition in New Jersey and "has long been a part of our State's social fabric." Burns v. Market Transition Facility, 281 N.J.Super. 304, 310 , 657 A. 2d 472 (App.Div. 1995); see also Layden v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 129 N.J.L. 54, 58 , 28 A. 2d 96 (E. & A.1942); Eyrich for Eyrich v. Dam, 193 N.J.Super. 244, 256 , 473 A. 2d 539 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 97 N.J. 583 , 483 A. 2d 127 (1984); Harrison v. Middlesex Water Co., 158 N.J.Super. 368, 376 , 386 A. 2d 405 (App. Div.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 80 N.J. 391 , 403 A. 2d 910 (1979); Cafone v 1998The rescue doctrine has received general recognition in New Jersey and "has long been a part of our State's social fabric." Burns v. Market Transition Facility, 281 N.J.Super. 304, 310 , 657 A. 2d 472 (App.Div. 1995); see also Layden v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 129 N.J.L. 54, 58 , 28 A. 2d 96 (E. & A.1942); Eyrich for Eyrich v. Dam, 193 N.J.Super. 244, 256 , 473 A. 2d 539 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 97 N.J. 583 , 483 A. 2d 127 (1984); Harrison v. Middlesex Water Co., 158 N.J.Super. 368, 376 , 386 A. 2d 405 (App. Div.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 80 N.J. 391 , 403 A. 2d 910 (1979); Cafone v | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Harrison v. Middlesex Water Company
green
2 sentences1998The rescue doctrine has received general recognition in New Jersey and "has long been a part of our State's social fabric." Burns v. Market Transition Facility, 281 N.J.Super. 304, 310 , 657 A. 2d 472 (App.Div. 1995); see also Layden v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 129 N.J.L. 54, 58 , 28 A. 2d 96 (E. & A.1942); Eyrich for Eyrich v. Dam, 193 N.J.Super. 244, 256 , 473 A. 2d 539 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 97 N.J. 583 , 483 A. 2d 127 (1984); Harrison v. Middlesex Water Co., 158 N.J.Super. 368, 376 , 386 A. 2d 405 (App. Div.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 80 N.J. 391 , 403 A. 2d 910 (1979); Cafone v 1998The rescue doctrine has received general recognition in New Jersey and "has long been a part of our State's social fabric." Burns v. Market Transition Facility, 281 N.J.Super. 304, 310 , 657 A. 2d 472 (App.Div. 1995); see also Layden v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 129 N.J.L. 54, 58 , 28 A. 2d 96 (E. & A.1942); Eyrich for Eyrich v. Dam, 193 N.J.Super. 244, 256 , 473 A. 2d 539 (App.Div.), certif. denied, 97 N.J. 583 , 483 A. 2d 127 (1984); Harrison v. Middlesex Water Co., 158 N.J.Super. 368, 376 , 386 A. 2d 405 (App. Div.1978), rev'd on other grounds, 80 N.J. 391 , 403 A. 2d 910 (1979); Cafone v | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.