Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1911–2023 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Marshallgreen2 sentences2021See 148 N.J. at 270 . 2021See 148 N.J. at 270 . | 1 | 1 |
Strada v. Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.green2 sentences1986We here adopt the view that there is "no libel by innuendo of a public figure where the challenged communication is true." Strada v. Conn. Newspapers, Inc., 193 Conn. 313 , 477 A. 2d 1005, 1012 (1984). 1986We here adopt the view that there is "no libel by innuendo of a public figure where the challenged communication is true." Strada v. Conn. Newspapers, Inc., 193 Conn. 313 , 477 A. 2d 1005, 1012 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jackson
green
2 sentences2023The Public Defender argues that active-duty police officers within the same county in which a criminal defendant is being prosecuted "must work closely with" the prosecutor's office "on a regular basis" as "a necessary component of their jobs." As argued by the Public Defender, that relationship is indicative of an inability as jurors to consider the evidence "with the measure of impartiality required by the law." (citing Jackson, 43 N.J. at 160 ). 2023The Public Defender argues that active-duty police officers within the same county in which a criminal defendant is being prosecuted "must work closely with" the prosecutor's office "on a regular basis" as "a necessary component of their jobs." As argued by the Public Defender, that relationship is indicative of an inability as jurors to consider the evidence "with the measure of impartiality required by the law." (citing Jackson, 43 N.J. at 160 ). | 2 | 2023–2023 |
Klimko v. Rose
green
2 sentences2001Hence, "when a risk is obvious and a precautionary measure available, an industry or professional standard or custom that does not call for such precaution is not conclusive, if, regardless of the standard or custom, the exercise of reasonable care *251 would call for a higher standard." Klimko v. Rose, 84 N.J. 496 , 506 n. 4, 422 A. 2d 418 (1980). 2001Hence, "when a risk is obvious and a precautionary measure available, an industry or professional standard or custom that does not call for such precaution is not conclusive, if, regardless of the standard or custom, the exercise of reasonable care *251 would call for a higher standard." Klimko v. Rose, 84 N.J. 496 , 506 n. 4, 422 A. 2d 418 (1980). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Lund
green
2 sentences1996Examples of such factors are additional evasive action, lying to the police, the presence of other incriminating information about the motorist or occupants of the car, the absence of identification, and even the lateness of the hour. [ Id. at 48 , 573 A. 2d 1376 .] *634 In Lund , the Court also considered what standard an officer should be held to when considering whether he has acted reasonably under the circumstances: [I]n determining whether the officer acted reasonably in such circumstances, due weight must be given, not to his inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or `hunch,' but to th 1996Examples of such factors are additional evasive action, lying to the police, the presence of other incriminating information about the motorist or occupants of the car, the absence of identification, and even the lateness of the hour. [ Id. at 48 , 573 A. 2d 1376 .] *634 In Lund , the Court also considered what standard an officer should be held to when considering whether he has acted reasonably under the circumstances: [I]n determining whether the officer acted reasonably in such circumstances, due weight must be given, not to his inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or `hunch,' but to th | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Rivera v. Grill
green
1 sentence1964The trial court properly limited counsel." ( 65 N.J. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Insurance Co. v. Trefz
green
1 sentence1911Knickerbocker Life Insurance Co. v. Trefz. 104 U. S. 197 . | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.