8 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1946–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Kubrickgreen2 sentences1983To excuse him from promptly *503 doing so by postponing the accrual of his claim would undermine the purpose of the limitations statute____ Id., at 123 , 100 S.Ct. at 360 . 1983To excuse him from promptly *503 doing so by postponing the accrual of his claim would undermine the purpose of the limitations statute____ Id., at 123 , 100 S.Ct. at 360 . | 1 | 3 |
Option One Mortgage Corp. v. Fitzgeraldgreen1 sentence2024Corp. v. Fitzgerald, 687 F.Supp. 2d 520, 529 (M.D. | 1 | 1 |
Darien Capital Management, Inc. v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2019In Darien Capital Management, Inc. v. Public School Employes’ Retirement System, 700 A.2d 395, 397 (Pa. 1997), the Court stated as follows: A claim accrues when 1) a claimant is first able to litigate his or her claim, e.g., when the amount due under the claim is known and the claimant is capable of preparing a concise and specific written statement detailing the injury, and 2) the claimant is affirmatively notified that he or she will not be paid by the Commonwealth. | 1 | 1 |
Waasdorp v. DiGiuseppegreen1 sentence1983Based on the foregoing, therefore, we reject appellant’s theory. 10 “[A] potential plaintiff need not have knowledge that he has a cause of action in order for the statute to run---- In the absence of fraud or concealment the statute begins to run when a tort is ascertainable.” Wallace v. Horvath, 283 Pa.Superior Ct. 179, 423 A.2d 1047, 1050 (1980) (Brosky, J. concurring). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Dubose, R. v. Willowcrest Nur. Home, Aplts.
green
2 sentences2020Dubose, 173 A.3d at 643-45 . 2020Dubose, 173 A.3d at 643-45 . | 2 | 2020–2020 |
United States v. Emory
green
2 sentences1946One exception is mortgages executed previous to the accrual of the claim of the United States: U. S. v. Waddill, Holland and Flinn, Inc., supra; People of the State of New York v. Maclay, supra; U. S. v. Texas, supra; U. S. v. Emory, 314 U. S. 423 , 62 S. Ct. 317 , 86 L. 1946One exception is mortgages executed previous to the accrual of the claim of the United States: U. S. v. Waddill, Holland and Flinn, Inc., supra; People of the State of New York v. Maclay, supra; U. S. v. Texas, supra; U. S. v. Emory, 314 U. S. 423 , 62 S. Ct. 317 , 86 L. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.