Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1964–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Employers Casualty Company v. Tilleygreen2 sentences2014See id. at 559 (recognizing that an attorney may continue to represent the insured when a conflict of interest arises if the insured acquiesces in the continuation of such defense). 2014See id. at 559 (recognizing that an attorney may continue to represent the insured when a conflict of interest arises if the insured acquiesces in the continuation of such defense). | 2 | 2 |
McGuire v. Stategreen1 sentence2005See McGuire v. State , 617 S.W.2d 259, 261 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Fimberg v. Stategreen1 sentence2005App. 2003). 11: Cf. Fimberg v. State , 922 S.W.2d 205, 207 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1996, pet. ref’d) (holding that defendant’s claim that he was misinformed by counsel is not enough to hold that his plea was involuntary when record contains no evidence of alleged misinformation by counsel other than appellant’s own testimony). 12: There is no record of the guilty plea hearing and no testimony was taken at the continuation of the hearing after the PSI was completed. 13: The cases on which appellant relies are inapposite because they all involved evidence showing that the appellant was pr | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Department of Health v. Long
green
2 sentences2008Id. 2008Id. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Munn v. Illinois
green
2 sentences2010Although a “person has no property, no vested interest, in any rule of the common law,” nevertheless, “[rlights of property which have been created by the common law cannot be taken away without due 'process.” Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113, 134 , 24 L.Ed. 77 (1877). 2010Although a “person has no property, no vested interest, in any rule of the common law,” nevertheless, “[rlights of property which have been created by the common law cannot be taken away without due 'process.” Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S. 113, 134 , 24 L.Ed. 77 (1877). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Felderhoff v. Felderhoff
green
2 sentences1988The continuation of the doctrine in those respects, the Court reasoned, was necessary to prevent judicial disruption of “the wide sphere of reasonable discretion which is necessary in order for parents to properly exercise their responsibility to provide nurture, care and discipline for their children.” Id. 1988The Court explicated those parental duties as those usually pertaining to “the provision of a home, food, schooling, family chores, medical care and recreation.” Id. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Rattikin Title Co. v. Grievance Committee of State Bar of Texas
green
1 sentence1964In Rattikin Title Company v. Grievance Committee of State Bar of Texas, Tex.Civ.App., 272 S.W.2d 948 , the Court recognized the status quo rule and said: “But in an injunction case wherein the very acts sought to be enjoined are acts which prima facie constitute the violation of expressed law, the status quo could never be a condition of affairs where the respondent would be permitted to continue the acts constituting that violation.” The Court held that when it is determined that the law is being violated, it is the province and the duty of the court to restrain it. | 1 | 1964–1964 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.