Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. Valero Energy Corp.green2 sentences2006Valero Energy Corp. , 997 S.W.2d at 212 . 2004Ingersoll-Rand Company v. Valero Energy Corporation, supra at 206-07. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Maestasgreen2 sentences2021The Supreme Court of Massachusetts has held that marrying the witness can constitute wrongdoing, if done so that the witness can invoke a spousal privilege against testifying.25 And the First Circuit has held that fleeing the jurisdiction can constitute the requisite wrongdoing if a witness dies of natural causes before the defendant is apprehended.26 New Mexico’s Supreme Court has concluded that the rationale supporting the doctrine suggests that the interest in disclosing relevant information at trial is paramount and that “any significant interference with that interest beyond the exercise 2021The Supreme Court of Massachusetts has held that marrying the witness can constitute wrongdoing, if done so that the witness can invoke a spousal privilege against testifying.25 And the First Circuit has held that fleeing the jurisdiction can constitute the requisite wrongdoing if a witness dies of natural causes before the defendant is apprehended.26 New Mexico’s Supreme Court has concluded that the rationale supporting the doctrine suggests that the interest in disclosing relevant information at trial is paramount and that “any significant interference with that interest beyond the exercise | 1 | 1 |
State v. Coxgreen1 sentence2021The Supreme Court of Massachusetts has held that marrying the witness can constitute wrongdoing, if done so that the witness can invoke a spousal privilege against testifying.25 And the First Circuit has held that fleeing the jurisdiction can constitute the requisite wrongdoing if a witness dies of natural causes before the defendant is apprehended.26 New Mexico’s Supreme Court has concluded that the rationale supporting the doctrine suggests that the interest in disclosing relevant information at trial is paramount and that “any significant interference with that interest beyond the exercise | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Ponzogreen1 sentence2021The Supreme Court of Massachusetts has held that marrying the witness can constitute wrongdoing, if done so that the witness can invoke a spousal privilege against testifying.25 And the First Circuit has held that fleeing the jurisdiction can constitute the requisite wrongdoing if a witness dies of natural causes before the defendant is apprehended.26 New Mexico’s Supreme Court has concluded that the rationale supporting the doctrine suggests that the interest in disclosing relevant information at trial is paramount and that “any significant interference with that interest beyond the exercise | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Szerlonggreen2 sentences2021The Supreme Court of Massachusetts has held that marrying the witness can constitute wrongdoing, if done so that the witness can invoke a spousal privilege against testifying.25 And the First Circuit has held that fleeing the jurisdiction can constitute the requisite wrongdoing if a witness dies of natural causes before the defendant is apprehended.26 New Mexico’s Supreme Court has concluded that the rationale supporting the doctrine suggests that the interest in disclosing relevant information at trial is paramount and that “any significant interference with that interest beyond the exercise 2021The Supreme Court of Massachusetts has held that marrying the witness can constitute wrongdoing, if done so that the witness can invoke a spousal privilege against testifying.25 And the First Circuit has held that fleeing the jurisdiction can constitute the requisite wrongdoing if a witness dies of natural causes before the defendant is apprehended.26 New Mexico’s Supreme Court has concluded that the rationale supporting the doctrine suggests that the interest in disclosing relevant information at trial is paramount and that “any significant interference with that interest beyond the exercise | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Glover v. Moser
green
2 sentences2006Because dominant jurisdiction concerns venue, by filing a general denial to appellant’s petition and, moreover, maintaining that position while the case was pending in the trial court for one and one-half years, the rationale supporting rule 86(1) waiver, as stated in Glover , 930 S.W.2d at 944 , compels the conclusion that Albro waived any right he may have had to transfer appellant’s claims to the county court. 2006Because dominant jurisdiction concerns venue, by filing a general denial to appellant’s petition and, moreover, maintaining that position while the case was pending in the trial court for one and one-half years, the rationale supporting rule 86(1) waiver, as stated in Glover, 930 S.W.2d at 944 , compels the conclusion that Albro waived any right he may have had to transfer appellant’s claims to the county court. | 2 | 2006–2006 |
Ex Parte Granger
green
1 sentence2005Id. at 519 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Price v. Price
green
1 sentence1991Price, 732 S.W.2d at 319-20 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Griswold v. Connecticut
green
2 sentences1985The “traditional relation of the family” is “a relation as old and as fundamental as our entire civilization.” Griswold, 381 U.S. at 496 , 85 S.Ct. at 1688 . 1985The “traditional relation of the family” is “a relation as old and as fundamental as our entire civilization.” Griswold, 381 U.S. at 496 , 85 S.Ct. at 1688 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.