Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Vermont opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gonzales ex rel. Gonzales v. Biermangreen2 sentences2016Similarly, in Gonzales v. Bierman, the Colorado Court of Appeals reversed an award of summary judgment to a landowner in a claim by plaintiffs who were injured when their car struck a horse owned by the landowner’s tenant. 773 P.2d 629, 630 (Colo. App. 1989). 2016Similarly, in Gonzales v. Bierman, the Colorado Court of Appeals reversed an award of summary judgment to a landowner in a claim by plaintiffs who were injured when their car struck a horse owned by the landowner’s tenant. 773 P.2d 629, 630 (Colo. App. 1989). | 2 | 2 |
Jacobsen v. City of Rathdrumgreen1 sentence2026See, e.g., Stanley v. Tilcon Maine, Inc., 541 A.2d 951, 953 (Me. 1988) (holding recreational-use statute precludes liability in face of attractive nuisance); Jacobsen v. City of Rathdrum, 766 P.2d 736, 739 (Idaho 1988) (explaining “the recreational use statute does not preclude the liability of a landowner under this doctrine”). ¶ 28. | 1 | 1 |
Stanley v. Tilcon Maine, Inc.green1 sentence2026See, e.g., Stanley v. Tilcon Maine, Inc., 541 A.2d 951, 953 (Me. 1988) (holding recreational-use statute precludes liability in face of attractive nuisance); Jacobsen v. City of Rathdrum, 766 P.2d 736, 739 (Idaho 1988) (explaining “the recreational use statute does not preclude the liability of a landowner under this doctrine”). ¶ 28. | 1 | 1 |
Doria v. University of Vermontgreen2 sentences2007See Dorian v. Unin of Vt., 156 Vt. 114, 119 , 589 A.2d 317, 320 (1991) (holding that the plaintiff’s request for nominal damages did not defeat mootness as it appeared that the request was made solely to obtain a ruling on a moot issue). 2007See Dorian v. Unin of Vt., 156 Vt. 114, 119 , 589 A.2d 317, 320 (1991) (holding that the plaintiff’s request for nominal damages did not defeat mootness as it appeared that the request was made solely to obtain a ruling on a moot issue). | 1 | 1 |
Town of Charlotte v. Richmondgreen2 sentences1998The Town relies on Town of Charlotte v. Richmond, 158 Vt. 354 , 609 A.2d 638 (1992), where we held that failure to appeal to the zoning board of adjustment from a zoning administrator’s decision that a landowner was in violation of the zoning ordinance bound the landowner in a later enforcement action. 1998The Town relies on Town of Charlotte v. Richmond, 158 Vt. 354 , 609 A.2d 638 (1992), where we held that failure to appeal to the zoning board of adjustment from a zoning administrator’s decision that a landowner was in violation of the zoning ordinance bound the landowner in a later enforcement action. | 1 | 1 |
Ciaffone v. Community Shopping Corp.green2 sentences1995See Ciaffone v. Community Shopping Corp., 195 Va. 41 , 77 S.E.2d 817, 821 (1953) (a stricter construction of zoning ordinance is required in the case of prosecutions to enforce penal provisions of the ordinance). 1995See Ciaffone v. Community Shopping Corp., 195 Va. 41 , 77 S.E.2d 817, 821 (1953) (a stricter construction of zoning ordinance is required in the case of prosecutions to enforce penal provisions of the ordinance). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re Beliveau NOV, Town of Fairfax v. Beliveau
green
1 sentence2024In re Beliveau NOV, 2013 VT 41, ¶¶ 23-25 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Knight v. Heaton
green
1 sentence1987Finally, plaintiffs rely on Knight v. Heaton, 22 Vt. 480 (1850), which held that a landowner could claim prescriptive rights in a town highway. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.