Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Green
green
2 sentences1968As we said in the recent case of State v. Green, 71 Wn.2d 372 , 428 P.2d 540 (1967), the final measure of error in a criminal case is not whether a defendant was afforded a perfect trial, but whether he was afforded a fair trial. 1968As we said in the recent case of State v. Green, 71 Wn.2d 372 , 428 P.2d 540 (1967), the final measure of error in a criminal case is not whether a defendant was afforded a perfect trial, but whether he was afforded a fair trial. | 3 | 1968–2004 |
State v. Schrager
green
2 sentences1982As stated by this court in State v. Schrager, 74 Wn.2d 75, 82 , 442 P.2d 1004 (1968): In State v. Miles, 73 Wn.2d 67, 70 , 436 P.2d 198 (1968), we said that "the final measure of error in a criminal case is not whether a defendant was afforded a perfect trial, but whether he was afforded a fair trial." The defendant had a fair trial and his conviction will stand. 1982As stated by this court in State v. Schrager, 74 Wn.2d 75, 82 , 442 P.2d 1004 (1968): In State v. Miles, 73 Wn.2d 67, 70 , 436 P.2d 198 (1968), we said that "the final measure of error in a criminal case is not whether a defendant was afforded a perfect trial, but whether he was afforded a fair trial." The defendant had a fair trial and his conviction will stand. | 3 | 1969–1982 |
State v. Miles
green
2 sentences1982As stated by this court in State v. Schrager, 74 Wn.2d 75, 82 , 442 P.2d 1004 (1968): In State v. Miles, 73 Wn.2d 67, 70 , 436 P.2d 198 (1968), we said that "the final measure of error in a criminal case is not whether a defendant was afforded a perfect trial, but whether he was afforded a fair trial." The defendant had a fair trial and his conviction will stand. 1982As stated by this court in State v. Schrager, 74 Wn.2d 75, 82 , 442 P.2d 1004 (1968): In State v. Miles, 73 Wn.2d 67, 70 , 436 P.2d 198 (1968), we said that "the final measure of error in a criminal case is not whether a defendant was afforded a perfect trial, but whether he was afforded a fair trial." The defendant had a fair trial and his conviction will stand. | 2 | 1968–1982 |
State Ex Rel. Donohue v. Coe
neutral
2 sentences2006State ex rel. *959 Donohue v. Coe, 49 Wash.2d 410, 414-15 , 302 P.2d 202 (1956). 2006State ex rel. *959 Donohue v. Coe, 49 Wash.2d 410, 414-15 , 302 P.2d 202 (1956). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Mines
neutral
1 sentence1970App. 433, 435 , 462 P.2d 569 (1969), we said: Our Supreme Court had held the final measure of error in a criminal case is not whether a defendant was afforded a perfect trial, but whether he was afforded a fair trial. | 1 | 1970–1970 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.